• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于测量和报告久坐行为干预研究的标准化核心结局集:CROSBI 共识研究。

A Standardised Core Outcome Set for Measurement and Reporting Sedentary Behaviour Interventional Research: The CROSBI Consensus Study.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.

Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technological University of Shannon, N37 HD68 Athlone, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9666. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159666.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19159666
PMID:35955024
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9367894/
Abstract

Heterogeneity of descriptors and outcomes measured and reported in sedentary behaviour (SB) research hinder the meta-analysis of data and accumulation of evidence. The objective of the Core Research Outcomes for Sedentary Behaviour Interventions (CROSBI) consensus study was to identify and validate, a core outcome set (COS) to report (what, how, when to measure) in interventional sedentary behaviour studies. Outcomes, extracted from a systematic literature review, were categorized into domains and data items (COS v0.0). International experts (n = 5) provided feedback and identified additional items, which were incorporated into COS v0.1. A two round online Delphi survey was conducted to seek consensus from a wider stakeholder group and outcomes that achieved consensus in the second round COS (v0.2), were ratified by the expert panel. The final COS (v1.0) contains 53 data items across 12 domains, relating to demographics, device details, wear-time criteria, wear-time measures, posture-related measures, sedentary breaks, sedentary bouts and physical activity. Notably, results indicate that sedentary behaviour outcomes should be measured by devices that include an inclinometry or postural function. The proposed standardised COS is available openly to enhance the accumulation of pooled evidence in future sedentary behaviour intervention research and practice.

摘要

行为研究中测量和报告的描述符和结果存在异质性,这阻碍了数据的荟萃分析和证据的积累。久坐行为干预的核心研究结果(CROSBI)共识研究的目的是确定和验证一个核心结果集(COS),以报告(测量什么、如何测量、何时测量)干预性久坐行为研究。从系统文献回顾中提取的结果被分类为领域和数据项(COS v0.0)。国际专家(n=5)提供了反馈,并确定了其他项目,这些项目被纳入 COS v0.1。进行了两轮在线 Delphi 调查,以寻求更广泛的利益相关者群体的共识,并在第二轮 COS(v0.2)中达成共识的结果,由专家小组批准。最终的 COS(v1.0)包含 12 个领域的 53 个数据项,涉及人口统计学、设备详细信息、佩戴时间标准、佩戴时间测量、与姿势相关的测量、久坐休息、久坐时间和身体活动。值得注意的是,研究结果表明,久坐行为结果应该通过包括倾斜计或姿势功能的设备进行测量。所提出的标准化 COS 可供公开使用,以增强未来久坐行为干预研究和实践中汇总证据的积累。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e9/9367894/16deaeac098a/ijerph-19-09666-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e9/9367894/56069497a4a0/ijerph-19-09666-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e9/9367894/16deaeac098a/ijerph-19-09666-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e9/9367894/56069497a4a0/ijerph-19-09666-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e9/9367894/16deaeac098a/ijerph-19-09666-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Standardised Core Outcome Set for Measurement and Reporting Sedentary Behaviour Interventional Research: The CROSBI Consensus Study.用于测量和报告久坐行为干预研究的标准化核心结局集:CROSBI 共识研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9666. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159666.
2
A minimum data set-Core outcome set, core data elements, and core measurement set-For degenerative cervical myelopathy research (AO Spine RECODE DCM): A consensus study.最小数据集-核心结局集、核心数据元素和核心测量集-用于退行性颈椎脊髓病研究(AO 脊柱 RECODE DCM):一项共识研究。
PLoS Med. 2024 Aug 22;21(8):e1004447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004447. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Core Domains for Research on Hospital Inactivity in Acutely Ill Older Adults: A Delphi Consensus Study.急危重症老年患者院内不活动的研究核心领域:德尔菲共识研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr;102(4):664-674. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.10.136. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
4
Core Health Outcomes in Childhood Epilepsy (CHOICE): Development of a core outcome set using systematic review methods and a Delphi survey consensus.儿童癫痫核心健康结局研究(CHOICE):使用系统评价方法和德尔菲调查共识制定核心结局集。
Epilepsia. 2019 May;60(5):857-871. doi: 10.1111/epi.14735. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
5
Development of a Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials in Non-infectious Uveitis of the Posterior Segment.开发用于后部非感染性葡萄膜炎临床试验的核心结局集。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Aug;128(8):1209-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.01.022. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
6
Core Outcome Sets (COS) related to pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review.与妊娠和分娩相关的核心结局集(COS):系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04164-y.
7
Developing a core outcome set for physical activity interventions in primary schools: a modified-Delphi study.制定小学体育活动干预的核心结局指标集:一项改良德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 30;12(9):e061335. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061335.
8
A protocol for the Development of Core Outcome Sets for Endodontic Treatment modalities (COSET): an international consensus process.用于牙髓治疗方式的核心结局集(COSET)制定的方案:一项国际共识流程。
Trials. 2021 Nov 17;22(1):812. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05764-x.
9
Methodology in core outcome set (COS) development: the impact of patient interviews and using a 5-point versus a 9-point Delphi rating scale on core outcome selection in a COS development study.核心结局集(COS)开发中的方法学:患者访谈以及使用 5 点和 9 点 Delphi 评分量表对 COS 开发研究中核心结局选择的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01197-3.
10
World Workshop on Oral Medicine VIII: Development of a core outcome set for oral lichen planus: a consensus study.世界口腔医学研讨会第八届会议:口腔扁平苔藓核心结局集的制定:一项共识研究。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2023 Jun;135(6):792-803. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2023.01.013. Epub 2023 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining and reporting activity patterns: a modified Delphi study.定义和报告活动模式:一项改良版德尔菲研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Jul 25;20(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01482-6.
2
Comparing the activPAL CREA and GHLA Algorithms for the Classification of Postures and Activity in Free-Living Children.比较 activPAL CREA 和 GHLA 算法在自由活动儿童姿势和活动分类中的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;19(23):15962. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315962.

本文引用的文献

1
Agreement of sedentary behaviour metrics derived from hip-worn and thigh-worn accelerometers among older adults: with implications for studying physical and cognitive health.老年人中源自髋部佩戴和大腿佩戴加速度计的久坐行为指标的一致性:对身体和认知健康研究的启示
J Meas Phys Behav. 2021 Mar;4(1):79-88. doi: 10.1123/jmpb.2020-0036. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
2
Efficacy, characteristics, behavioural models and behaviour change strategies, of non-workplace interventions specifically targeting sedentary behaviour; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials in healthy ambulatory adults.针对健康非卧床成年人的特定久坐行为的非工作场所干预措施的功效、特征、行为模型和行为改变策略:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 7;16(9):e0256828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256828. eCollection 2021.
3
How Accurate and Precise Can We Measure the Posture and the Energy Expenditure Component of Sedentary Behaviour with One Sensor?使用一个传感器,我们对久坐行为的姿势和能量消耗成分的测量能有多准确和精确?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 27;18(11):5782. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115782.
4
Comprehensive comparison of Apple Watch and Fitbit monitors in a free-living setting.在自由生活环境下,对 Apple Watch 和 Fitbit 监测器的综合比较。
PLoS One. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0251975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251975. eCollection 2021.
5
The CNN Hip Accelerometer Posture (CHAP) Method for Classifying Sitting Patterns from Hip Accelerometers: A Validation Study.基于 CNN 加速度计的坐姿分类方法(CHAP):对髋关节加速度计坐姿模式的验证性研究。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Nov 1;53(11):2445-2454. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002705.
6
A Comparison of Sedentary Behavior as Measured by the Fitbit and ActivPAL in College Students.《基于 Fitbit 和 ActivPAL 对大学生久坐行为的比较研究》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;18(8):3914. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083914.
7
Accumulation patterns of sedentary time and breaks and their association with cardiometabolic health markers in adults.成年人久坐时间和休息时间的积累模式及其与心血管代谢健康标志物的关系。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021 Jul;31(7):1489-1507. doi: 10.1111/sms.13958. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
8
Objective and subjective measurement of sedentary behavior in human adults: A toolkit.成人久坐行为的客观和主观测量:工具包。
Am J Hum Biol. 2022 Jan;34(1):e23546. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23546. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
9
World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour.世界卫生组织 2020 年关于身体活动和 sedentary behaviour 的指南。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1451-1462. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955.
10
New global guidelines on sedentary behaviour and health for adults: broadening the behavioural targets.新的全球成年人久坐行为与健康指南:拓宽行为目标。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 26;17(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01044-0.