• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种构建包含主观层面的医疗保健指数的新方法。

A New Approach for Constructing a Health Care Index including the Subjective Level.

机构信息

Institute of Sociology, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany.

Institute of Labor Sciences, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9686. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159686.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19159686
PMID:35955040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9368045/
Abstract

Until now, health care systems have been compared by means of macro criteria, an approach that might have its shortcomings in assessing the actual benefits that health care systems may provide for people. Therefore, a new health care index is presented which combines individual assessments of health care systems with objective macro health care system criteria. Two steps are taken for furthering this approach: First, a data-driven procedure is used to determine the influence of self-rated health on confidence in the health care system through macro criteria of health care systems. The macro indicators are weighted accordingly and created into an index, which adds to the subjective level of the link. In a second step, the constructed health care index is tested in a multilevel model with self-rated health being the dependent variable, to avoid tautological conclusions. The index is able to reduce country differences, decrease explained variability and has a statistically significant effect without affecting other estimates.

摘要

到目前为止,医疗保健系统一直是通过宏观标准进行比较的,这种方法在评估医疗保健系统可能为人们提供的实际利益方面可能存在不足。因此,提出了一种新的医疗保健指数,它将对医疗保健系统的个体评估与客观的宏观医疗保健系统标准相结合。为了进一步推进这一方法,采取了两个步骤:首先,使用数据驱动的程序来确定通过医疗保健系统的宏观标准来确定自评健康对医疗保健系统信心的影响。相应地对宏观指标进行加权,并创建成一个指数,从而增加了联系的主观程度。在第二步中,使用多层次模型对构建的医疗保健指数进行测试,其中自评健康是因变量,以避免同义反复的结论。该指数能够减少国家差异,降低可解释的变异性,并且具有统计学意义的效果,而不会影响其他估计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e651/9368045/85f2bcd4440d/ijerph-19-09686-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e651/9368045/033f451f0884/ijerph-19-09686-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e651/9368045/370fec810d5a/ijerph-19-09686-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e651/9368045/7ebc0b175da3/ijerph-19-09686-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e651/9368045/85f2bcd4440d/ijerph-19-09686-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e651/9368045/033f451f0884/ijerph-19-09686-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e651/9368045/370fec810d5a/ijerph-19-09686-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e651/9368045/7ebc0b175da3/ijerph-19-09686-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e651/9368045/85f2bcd4440d/ijerph-19-09686-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A New Approach for Constructing a Health Care Index including the Subjective Level.一种构建包含主观层面的医疗保健指数的新方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9686. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159686.
2
Objective and subjective determinants of self-rated health in Central and Eastern Europe: a multilevel approach.中东欧自评健康的客观与主观决定因素:一种多层次方法。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2019 Jun;27(2):145-152. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a5226.
3
Predicting group-level outcome variables from variables measured at the individual level: a latent variable multilevel model.从个体层面测量的变量预测组层面的结果变量:一种潜在变量多级模型。
Psychol Methods. 2007 Mar;12(1):45-57. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.45.
4
Multilevel analysis in rural cancer control: A conceptual framework and methodological implications.农村癌症控制中的多层次分析:概念框架与方法学意义。
Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129S:105835. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105835. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
5
Linking resilience and regulation across system levels in healthcare - a multilevel study.连接医疗保健系统各级别的弹性和调节 - 一项多层次研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 15;22(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07848-z.
6
A structuration framework for bridging the macro-micro divide in health-care governance.一个用于弥合医疗保健治理中宏观与微观差距的结构化框架。
Health Expect. 2016 Aug;19(4):790-804. doi: 10.1111/hex.12375. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
7
[Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].葡萄牙国民医疗服务体系中的效率与质量:评估方法
Acta Med Port. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):397-410. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
8
Individual and community-level determinants, and spatial distribution of institutional delivery in Ethiopia, 2016: Spatial and multilevel analysis.埃塞俄比亚 2016 年个体和社区层面决定因素及机构分娩的空间分布:空间和多水平分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 12;15(11):e0242242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242242. eCollection 2020.
9
Complete basic childhood vaccination and associated factors among children aged 12-23 months in East Africa: a multilevel analysis of recent demographic and health surveys.东非 12-23 月龄儿童完成基础儿童疫苗接种及其影响因素:近期人口与健康调查的多水平分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 1;20(1):1837. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09965-y.
10
Skilled delivery service utilization and its association with the establishment of Women's Health Development Army in Yeky district, South West Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis.埃塞俄比亚西南部耶基区熟练接生服务的利用情况及其与妇女健康发展军队建立的关联:一项多层次分析
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Jan 30;11(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3140-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond objective metrics: A comparative analysis of health care systems incorporating subjective dimensions to improve comparability of access and equity in healthcare assessments.超越客观指标:纳入主观维度的医疗保健系统的比较分析,以提高医疗保健评估中可及性和公平性的可比性。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 21;19(6):e0304834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304834. eCollection 2024.
2
The Search for an Outcome Variable That Measures Both Quality and Processes in Cardiac Surgery: Comparing the Quality Process Index and Mortality.寻找一种能衡量心脏手术质量和过程的结果变量:比较质量过程指数与死亡率。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 14;11(10):1419. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101419.

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants of inequalities in life expectancy: an international comparative study of eight risk factors.预期寿命不平等的决定因素:八项风险因素的国际比较研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Oct;4(10):e529-e537. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30147-1.
2
Education and mental health: Do psychosocial resources matter?教育与心理健康:社会心理资源重要吗?
SSM Popul Health. 2019 Mar 29;7:100392. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100392. eCollection 2019 Apr.
3
Mental and physical health impairments at the transition to college: Early patterns in the education-health gradient.
向大学过渡阶段的身心健康损害:教育-健康梯度中的早期模式。
Soc Sci Res. 2018 Aug;74:120-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 7.
4
What Do We Rate When We Rate Our Health? Decomposing Age-related Contributions to Self-rated Health.当我们评价自己的健康时,我们评价的是什么?分解自评健康中与年龄相关的贡献。
J Health Soc Behav. 2018 Mar;59(1):74-93. doi: 10.1177/0022146517750137. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
5
Gender and the structure of self-rated health across the adult life span.性别与成年期自评健康结构。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Aug;187:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
6
The progressivity of health-care financing in Kenya.肯尼亚医疗保健筹资的累进性。
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Oct;29(7):912-20. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt073. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
7
How do you measure trust in the health system? A systematic review of the literature.如何衡量对医疗体系的信任?文献系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Aug;91:10-4. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 May 14.
8
The relationship between self-rated health and objective health status: a population-based study.自评健康与客观健康状况之间的关系:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 9;13:320. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-320.
9
Survivor bias and risk assessment.幸存者偏差与风险评估。
Eur Respir J. 2012 Sep;40(3):530-2. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00094112.
10
MissForest--non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data.MissForest--用于混合类型数据的非参数缺失值插补。
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jan 1;28(1):112-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597. Epub 2011 Oct 28.