Squara Fabien, Scarlatti Didier, Bun Sok-Sithikun, Moceri Pamela, Ferrari Emile, Meste Olivier, Zarzoso Vicente
Cardiology Department, Université Côte d'Azur, Pasteur Hospital, 30 Avenue de la Voie Romaine, 06000 Nice, France.
I3S Laboratory, Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, 06900 Sophia Antipolis, France.
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 3;11(15):4519. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154519.
. Fibrillatory Wave Amplitude (FWA) has been described as a non-invasive marker of atrial fibrillation (AF) complexity, and it predicts catheter ablation outcome. However, the actual determinants of FWA remain incompletely understood. . To assess the respective implications of anatomical atrial substrate and AF spectral characteristics for FWA. . Persistent AF patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation were included. FWA was measured on 1-min ECG by TQ concatenation in Lead I, V1, V2, and V5 at baseline and immediately before AF termination. FWA evolution during ablation was compared to that of AF dominant frequency (DF) measured by Independent Component Analysis on 12-lead ECG. FWA was compared to the extent of endocardial low-voltage areas (LVA I < 10%; II 10-20%; III 20-30%; IV > 30%), to the surface of healthy left atrial tissue, and to P-wave amplitude in sinus rhythm. The predictive value of FWA for AF recurrence during follow-up was assessed. . We included 29 patients. FWA remained stable along ablation procedure with comparable values at baseline and before AF termination (Lead I = 0.54; V1 = 0.858; V2 = 0.215; V5 = 0.14), whereas DF significantly decreased (5.67 ± 0.68 vs. 4.95 ± 0.58 Hz, p < 0.001). FWA was higher in LVA-I than in LVA-II, -III, and -IV in Lead I and V5 ( = 0.02 and = 0.01). FWA in V5 was strongly correlated with the surface of healthy left atrial tissue (R = 0.786; p < 0.001). FWA showed moderate to strong correlation to P-wave amplitude in all leads. Finally, FWA did not predict AF recurrence after a follow-up of 23.3 ± 9.8 months. . These findings suggest that FWA is unrelated to AF complexity but is mainly determined by the amount of viable atrial myocytes. Therefore, FWA should only be referred as a marker of atrial tissue pathology.
颤动波振幅(FWA)已被描述为心房颤动(AF)复杂性的一种非侵入性标志物,并且它可预测导管消融结果。然而,FWA的实际决定因素仍未完全明确。为了评估心房解剖基质和AF频谱特征对FWA的各自影响。纳入接受射频导管消融的持续性AF患者。在基线时以及AF终止前即刻,通过I、V1、V2和V5导联的TQ拼接在1分钟心电图上测量FWA。将消融过程中FWA的演变与通过12导联心电图的独立成分分析测量的AF主导频率(DF)的演变进行比较。将FWA与心内膜低电压区的范围(I区<10%;II区10 - 20%;III区20 - 30%;IV区>30%)、健康左心房组织的表面积以及窦性心律时的P波振幅进行比较。评估FWA对随访期间AF复发的预测价值。我们纳入了29例患者。FWA在整个消融过程中保持稳定,基线时和AF终止前的值相当(I导联 = 0.54;V1导联 = 0.858;V2导联 = 0.215;V5导联 = 0.14),而DF显著降低(5.67±0.68对4.95±0.58Hz,p<0.001)。在I导联和V5导联中,FWA在I区低电压区高于II区、III区和IV区低电压区(p = 0.02和p = 0.01)。V5导联中的FWA与健康左心房组织的表面积密切相关(R = 0.786;p<0.001)。FWA在所有导联中与P波振幅呈中度至强相关。最后,在23.3±9.8个月的随访后,FWA未预测AF复发。这些发现表明,FWA与AF复杂性无关,而是主要由存活的心房肌细胞数量决定。因此,FWA仅应被视为心房组织病理学的一个标志物。