• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Differences in anxiety among patients with liver cirrhosis with different compensation abilities.不同代偿能力肝硬化患者焦虑情绪的差异。
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Jul 15;14(7):5187-5194. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of telbivudine efficacy in treatment-naive patients with hepatitis B virus-related compensated and decompensated cirrhosis in 96 weeks.替比夫定治疗 96 周时初治的乙型肝炎病毒相关代偿和失代偿肝硬化患者的疗效比较。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Apr;26(4):396-403. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000062.
3
[The clinical value of von Willebrand factor and VITRO score in evaluating disease progression in patients with HBV infection].[血管性血友病因子和VITRO评分在评估HBV感染患者疾病进展中的临床价值]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2022 Mar 20;30(3):309-315. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20210202-00061.
4
The Impact of Cirrhosis on Outcomes of Patients Admitted With Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Nationwide Study.肝硬化对糖尿病酮症酸中毒入院患者预后的影响:一项全国性研究。
Cureus. 2022 Jun 12;14(6):e25870. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25870. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Are there differences in risk factors, microbial aspects, and prognosis of cellulitis between compensated and decompensated hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis?代偿期和失代偿期丙型肝炎病毒相关性肝硬化患者的蜂窝织炎的危险因素、微生物方面和预后是否存在差异?
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;25(3):317-325. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2018.0097. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
6
[Efficacy and safety of adefovir dipivoxil in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis with Lamivudine resistance compared to patients with compensated liver disease].与代偿性肝病患者相比,阿德福韦酯治疗拉米夫定耐药失代偿期肝硬化患者的疗效和安全性
Korean J Hepatol. 2005 Jun;11(2):125-34.
7
Hemodynamic studies in acute-on-chronic liver failure.慢性肝衰竭急性发作的血流动力学研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Apr;54(4):869-78. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0421-9. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
8
Increased mortality with peptic ulcer bleeding in patients with both compensated and decompensated cirrhosis.在代偿期和失代偿期肝硬化患者中,消化性溃疡出血与死亡率增加相关。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Apr;79(4):605-14.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.026. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
9
Construction and Application of Patient-Participated Health Care Guidance Plan for Patients with Decompensated Hepatitis B Cirrhosis.失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者参与式医疗指导方案的构建与应用
Hepat Med. 2024 Jun 4;16:45-54. doi: 10.2147/HMER.S455557. eCollection 2024.
10
Safety and efficacy of tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B-related decompensated cirrhosis.替诺福韦治疗慢性乙型肝炎相关失代偿期肝硬化的安全性和疗效
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr 7;23(13):2396-2403. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i13.2396.

引用本文的文献

1
Family resilience and demoralization in decompensated cirrhosis: parallel mediation of psychological resilience and social support.失代偿期肝硬化患者家庭的恢复力与士气低落:心理恢复力和社会支持的平行中介作用
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 1;16:1623122. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1623122. eCollection 2025.
2
Depression and anxiety management in cirrhosis.肝硬化患者抑郁和焦虑的管理
Hepatol Commun. 2024 Dec 11;9(1). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000600. eCollection 2025 Jan 1.
3
Identification of Diagnostic Biomarkers for Compensatory Liver Cirrhosis Based on Gut Microbiota and Urine Metabolomics Analyses.基于肠道微生物组和尿液代谢组学分析鉴定代偿性肝硬化的诊断生物标志物。
Mol Biotechnol. 2024 Nov;66(11):3164-3181. doi: 10.1007/s12033-023-00922-9. Epub 2023 Oct 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of risk factors for mental health problems of inpatients with chronic liver disease and nursing strategies: A single center descriptive study.分析慢性肝病住院患者心理健康问题的危险因素及护理策略:一项单中心描述性研究。
Brain Behav. 2021 Dec;11(12):e2406. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2406. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
2
Liver cirrhosis.肝硬化。
Lancet. 2021 Oct 9;398(10308):1359-1376. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01374-X. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
3
The impact of intense nursing care in improving anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with liver cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.强化护理对改善肝癌患者焦虑、抑郁及生活质量的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 21;99(34):e21677. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021677.
4
Psychological Burden of Hepatic Encephalopathy on Patients and Caregivers.肝性脑病对患者和照护者的心理负担。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr;11(4):e00159. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000159.
5
Impact of acute-on-chronic liver failure and decompensated liver cirrhosis on psychosocial burden and quality of life of patients and their close relatives.急慢性肝衰竭和失代偿性肝硬化对患者及其直系亲属的心理社会负担和生活质量的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jan 13;18(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1268-9.
6
Motivational interviewing to improve the self-care behaviors for patients with chronic heart failure: A randomized controlled trial.动机性访谈对改善慢性心力衰竭患者自我护理行为的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2018 Apr 30;5(3):213-217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.04.012. eCollection 2018 Jul 10.
7
Diagnosis and Treatment of Alcohol-Associated Liver Diseases: 2019 Practice Guidance From the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.酒精性肝病的诊断与治疗:美国肝病研究协会2019年实践指南
Hepatology. 2020 Jan;71(1):306-333. doi: 10.1002/hep.30866.
8
Improvement in Quality of Life and Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis with the Use of Health Education and Patient Health Empowerment.健康教育和患者健康赋权可改善肝硬化患者的生活质量和日常生活活动能力。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jun 21;25:4602-4608. doi: 10.12659/MSM.914487.
9
Big Data Analytics, Infectious Diseases and Associated Ethical Impacts.大数据分析、传染病及相关伦理影响
Philos Technol. 2019;32(1):69-85. doi: 10.1007/s13347-017-0278-y. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
10
The relationship between internet addiction, social anxiety, impulsivity, self-esteem, and depression in a sample of Turkish undergraduate medical students.土耳其医学生样本中网络成瘾、社交焦虑、冲动、自尊和抑郁之间的关系。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Sep;267:313-318. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.033. Epub 2018 Jun 14.

不同代偿能力肝硬化患者焦虑情绪的差异。

Differences in anxiety among patients with liver cirrhosis with different compensation abilities.

作者信息

Ou Mengdang, Guo Xiaozhen, Li Ying, Zhang Haili, Liu Ting, Liu Qun, Wei Wen, Luo Xiaoqing, Zhang Yanyan

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, The Fifth Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Zhuhai 519000, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Am J Transl Res. 2022 Jul 15;14(7):5187-5194. eCollection 2022.

PMID:35958443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9360890/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the difference in anxiety and mental health of patients with liver cirrhosis with different compensatory abilities, so as to provide comprehensive treatment measures such as individualized psychological support for patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, a total of 175 patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to the Department of Infectious Diseases, Fifth Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January to December 2019 were included and divided into a compensated group (n=77) and a decompensated group (n=98). The anxiety of patients was evaluated on the day of admission, one week after hospitalization, and the day of discharge using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). Psychological investigations were conducted on the two groups of patients with cirrhosis.

RESULTS

The SAS score of patients in the decompensated group was higher than that of the compensated group on the day of admission (48.62±6.35 vs. 37.68±8.94, F=20.313), one week after hospitalization (56.95±7.47 vs. 42.79±10.77, F=29.879), and on the day of discharge (42.95±7.85 vs. 36.43±9.29, F=7.110) (P<0.05). The SAS score of male patients in the decompensated group was higher than that of the compensated group on the day of admission (47.50±6.25 vs. 36.70±9.92, t=-4.112), one week after hospitalization (57.25±5.80 vs. 42.10±13.24, t=-4.538) and on the day of discharge (42.33±7.34 vs. 36.19±9.65, t=-2.162) (all P<0.05). The SAS score of 40-59 year-old patients of the decompensated group was higher than that of patients in the compensated group of the same age on the day of admission (51.80±6.26 vs. 36.84±8.57, t=-4.372), one week after hospitalization (60.6±7.06 vs. 42.94±10.33, t=-4.382), and on the day of discharge (48.60±4.16 vs. 37.32±10.23, t=-3.768) (P<0.05). The SAS score of female patients in the decompensated group was higher than that in the compensated group at one week after hospitalization (56.56±9.65 vs. 35.45±18.66, t=-4.617) (P<0.05). There was no difference in the SAS score between patients of different groups on the day of admission and the day of discharge (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The anxiety of patients with different compensatory abilities of the liver is adversely affected by the severity of their illness and the length of hospitalization. The anxiety of male patients in the decompensated group is more significant than that of patients in the compensated group, while no significant difference was observed in anxiety between female patients in the decompensated group and those in the compensated group on the day of admission and discharge. It is necessary to strengthen psychological intervention, optimize the treatment methods, and reduce the average hospital stay in decompensated patients.

摘要

目的

探讨不同代偿能力肝硬化患者焦虑及心理健康状况的差异,为患者提供个体化心理支持等综合治疗措施。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入2019年1月至12月中山大学附属第五医院感染科收治的175例肝硬化患者,分为代偿组(n = 77)和失代偿组(n = 98)。分别于入院当日、住院1周后及出院当日采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)评估患者焦虑状况。对两组肝硬化患者进行心理调查。

结果

失代偿组患者入院当日(48.62±6.35 vs. 37.68±8.94,F = 20.313)、住院1周后(56.95±7.47 vs. 42.79±10.77,F = 29.879)及出院当日(42.95±7.85 vs. 36.43±9.29,F = 7.110)的SAS评分均高于代偿组(P<0.05)。失代偿组男性患者入院当日(47.50±6.25 vs. 36.70±9.92,t = -4.112)、住院1周后(57.25±5.80 vs. 42.10±13.24,t = -4.538)及出院当日(42.33±7.34 vs. 36.19±9.65,t = -2.162)的SAS评分均高于代偿组(均P<0.05)。失代偿组40 - 59岁患者入院当日(51.80±6.26 vs. 36.84±8.57,t = -4.372)、住院1周后(60.6±7.06 vs. 42.94±10.33,t = -4.382)及出院当日(48.60±4.16 vs. 37.32±10.23,t = -3.768)的SAS评分均高于同年龄段代偿组患者(P<0.05)。失代偿组女性患者住院1周后的SAS评分高于代偿组(56.56±9.65 vs. 35.45±18.66,t = -4.617)(P<0.05)。不同组患者入院当日及出院当日的SAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

肝脏不同代偿能力患者的焦虑受病情严重程度及住院时间的不良影响。失代偿组男性患者焦虑较代偿组患者更显著,而失代偿组女性患者与代偿组女性患者入院及出院当日焦虑无明显差异。有必要加强心理干预,优化治疗方法,缩短失代偿患者平均住院时间。