Peking University 302 Clinical Medical School, Beijing, China.
Senior Department of Infectious Diseases, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, China.
Front Immunol. 2022 Jul 26;13:894410. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.894410. eCollection 2022.
Precise predictors are lacking for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance under the combination therapy of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NA) and pegylated interferon-alpha (PEG-IFN-α) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study aimed to determine the quantitative anti-hepatitis B core antibody (qAnti-HBc) and quantitative hepatitis B core-related antigen (qHBcrAg) as predictors for HBsAg clearance in NA-suppressed patients with CHB receiving PEG-IFN-α add-on therapy.
Seventy-four CHB patients who achieved HBV DNA suppression (HBV DNA < 20 IU/ml) and quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg) < 1,500 IU/ml after ≥1 year of NA treatment were enrolled. Fifteen patients continued on NA monotherapy, while 59 patients received PEG-IFN-α add-on therapy. Serum qAnti-HBc and qHBcrAg levels were detected every 12 or 24 weeks for add-on and NA-alone groups, respectively.
Serum qAnti-HBc but not qHBcrAg levels at baseline were negatively correlated with the duration of prior NA therapy. After 48-week treatment, both qAnti-HBc and qHBcrAg levels declined further, and 17/59 (28.81%) and 0/15 (0%) achieved HBsAg clearance in add-on and NA groups, respectively. In the add-on group, the rate of HBsAg clearance was significantly higher in patients with baseline qAnti-HBc < 0.1 IU/ml (52.63%). Logistic regression analysis identified baseline qAnti-HBc but not qHBcrAg, which was an independent predictor for HBsAg loss. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the combination of qAnti-HBc and qHBsAg had a better predictive value for HBsAg clearance.
A combination of qHBsAg and baseline qAnti-HBc levels may be a better prediction strategy for HBsAg clearance in NA-suppressed CHB patients receiving PEG-IFN-α add-on therapy.
在核苷(酸)类似物(NA)联合聚乙二醇干扰素-α(PEG-IFN-α)治疗慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者中,HBsAg 清除的精确预测因子仍然缺乏。本研究旨在确定定量抗乙型肝炎核心抗体(qAnti-HBc)和定量乙型肝炎核心相关抗原(qHBcrAg)作为 NA 抑制的 CHB 患者接受 PEG-IFN-α附加治疗后 HBsAg 清除的预测因子。
纳入了 74 例 CHB 患者,这些患者在接受 NA 治疗≥1 年后达到 HBV DNA 抑制(HBV DNA < 20 IU/ml)和定量 HBsAg(qHBsAg)< 1,500 IU/ml。15 例患者继续接受 NA 单药治疗,59 例患者接受 PEG-IFN-α附加治疗。分别为附加组和 NA 单药组每 12 或 24 周检测血清 qAnti-HBc 和 qHBcrAg 水平。
基线时血清 qAnti-HBc 而不是 qHBcrAg 水平与之前 NA 治疗的持续时间呈负相关。经过 48 周治疗后,qAnti-HBc 和 qHBcrAg 水平进一步下降,附加组中有 17/59(28.81%)例和 NA 组中有 0/15(0%)例实现了 HBsAg 清除。在附加组中,基线时 qAnti-HBc < 0.1 IU/ml 的患者 HBsAg 清除率显著更高(52.63%)。Logistic 回归分析确定了基线 qAnti-HBc 而不是 qHBcrAg 是 HBsAg 丢失的独立预测因子。受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,qAnti-HBc 和 qHBsAg 的联合具有更好的预测 HBsAg 清除的价值。
在接受 PEG-IFN-α附加治疗的 NA 抑制的 CHB 患者中,qHBsAg 和基线 qAnti-HBc 水平的联合可能是预测 HBsAg 清除的更好策略。