Roeder Brent M, Riley Mitchell R, She Xiwei, Dakos Alexander S, Robinson Brian S, Moore Bryan J, Couture Daniel E, Laxton Adrian W, Popli Gautam, Clary Heidi M, Sam Maria, Heck Christi, Nune George, Lee Brian, Liu Charles, Shaw Susan, Gong Hui, Marmarelis Vasilis Z, Berger Theodore W, Deadwyler Sam A, Song Dong, Hampson Robert E
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Department Biomedical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 25;16:933401. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.933401. eCollection 2022.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the hippocampus is proposed for enhancement of memory impaired by injury or disease. Many pre-clinical DBS paradigms can be addressed in epilepsy patients undergoing intracranial monitoring for seizure localization, since they already have electrodes implanted in brain areas of interest. Even though epilepsy is usually not a memory disorder targeted by DBS, the studies can nevertheless model other memory-impacting disorders, such as Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI).
Human patients undergoing Phase II invasive monitoring for intractable epilepsy were implanted with depth electrodes capable of recording neurophysiological signals. Subjects performed a delayed-match-to-sample (DMS) memory task while hippocampal ensembles from CA1 and CA3 cell layers were recorded to estimate a multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) model of CA3-to-CA1 neural encoding and a memory decoding model (MDM) to decode memory information from CA3 and CA1 neuronal signals. After model estimation, subjects again performed the DMS task while either MIMO-based or MDM-based patterned stimulation was delivered to CA1 electrode sites during the encoding phase of the DMS trials. Each subject was sorted () by prior experience of repeated and/or mild-to-moderate brain injury (RMBI), TBI, or no history (control) and scored for percentage successful delayed recognition (DR) recall on stimulated vs. non-stimulated DMS trials. The subject's medical history was unknown to the experimenters until after individual subject memory retention results were scored.
When examined compared to control subjects, both TBI and RMBI subjects showed increased memory retention in response to both MIMO and MDM-based hippocampal stimulation. Furthermore, effects of stimulation were also greater in subjects who were evaluated as having pre-existing mild-to-moderate memory impairment.
These results show that hippocampal stimulation for memory facilitation was more beneficial for subjects who had previously suffered a brain injury (other than epilepsy), compared to control (epilepsy) subjects who had not suffered a brain injury. This study demonstrates that the epilepsy/intracranial recording model can be extended to test the ability of DBS to restore memory function in subjects who previously suffered a brain injury other than epilepsy, and support further investigation into the beneficial effect of DBS in TBI patients.
海马体深部脑刺激(DBS)被提议用于增强因损伤或疾病而受损的记忆。许多临床前DBS范式可在因癫痫发作定位而接受颅内监测的癫痫患者中进行研究,因为他们已经在感兴趣的脑区植入了电极。尽管癫痫通常不是DBS针对的记忆障碍,但这些研究仍可模拟其他影响记忆的疾病,如创伤性脑损伤(TBI)。
对接受难治性癫痫II期侵入性监测的人类患者植入能够记录神经生理信号的深度电极。受试者执行延迟匹配样本(DMS)记忆任务,同时记录来自CA1和CA3细胞层的海马神经元集群,以估计CA3到CA1神经编码的多输入多输出(MIMO)模型和从CA3和CA1神经元信号中解码记忆信息的记忆解码模型(MDM)。在模型估计后,受试者再次执行DMS任务,同时在DMS试验的编码阶段将基于MIMO或MDM的模式刺激传递到CA1电极部位。根据先前反复和/或轻度至中度脑损伤(RMBI)、TBI或无病史(对照)的经历对每个受试者进行分类,并对刺激与未刺激的DMS试验中成功延迟识别(DR)回忆的百分比进行评分。在对个体受试者的记忆保留结果进行评分之前,实验者对受试者的病史并不知情。
与对照受试者相比,TBI和RMBI受试者在基于MIMO和MDM的海马刺激下均表现出记忆保留增加。此外,在被评估为已有轻度至中度记忆障碍的受试者中,刺激的效果也更大。
这些结果表明,与未受过脑损伤的对照(癫痫)受试者相比,海马刺激促进记忆对先前受过脑损伤(非癫痫)的受试者更有益。本研究表明,癫痫/颅内记录模型可扩展用于测试DBS恢复先前受过非癫痫性脑损伤受试者记忆功能的能力,并支持进一步研究DBS对TBI患者的有益效果。