Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 12;17(8):e0272997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272997. eCollection 2022.
Clinical interpretation of trace results by Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay (Ultra) used as an initial diagnostic test for tuberculosis (TB) may be challenging. The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency and epidemiology of trace readouts in routine clinical practice in a low TB prevalence setting and to propose guidance on how to manage patients with trace calls considering the data available (clinical, radiological, bacteriological etc.).
A retrospective, observational, monocentric study was conducted at IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Bologna, Italy between November 2017-December 2020. Presumptive TB patients with at least one Ultra trace result during diagnostic workup before treatment were included in the study. Patients with ongoing anti-TB treatment at the time of the trace call result or with no clinical data available were excluded from the study.
Fifty-nine presumptive TB patients with Ultra trace readouts were included in the study (mean age 37.0 years, 61% males). Four patients had a history of TB in the last 2 years. Twenty-five (42.4%) of the 59 samples with trace results were respiratory material. 57/59 (96.6%) patients started anti-TB treatment soon after obtaining trace results, based on clinical, radiological or other information available, while for two patients with a recent history of TB the trace result did not lead to anti-TB treatment. Culture was positive for M. tuberculosis for 31/59 (52.5%) samples with trace calls: 13/25 (52.0%) were respiratory samples and 18/33 (54.5%) non-respiratory samples. The clinical and/or radiological findings of 47/57 (82.4%) patients given anti-TB therapy improved during treatment.
In low TB incidence settings, Ultra trace calls in presumptive TB patients should be considered as true-positive and treatment should be started promptly, except in cases of recent history of TB, where careful evaluation of other diagnostic criteria is necessary before starting anti-TB treatment. A decisional algorithm for clinical management is proposed.
Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra 检测(Ultra)作为结核病(TB)初始诊断检测手段,其检测结果为痕量时的临床解读可能具有挑战性。本研究的目的是评估在低结核病发病率环境下痕量检测结果在常规临床实践中的频率和流行病学,并根据现有数据(临床、影像学、细菌学等)就如何管理痕量检测结果的患者提出指导建议。
本研究为回顾性、观察性、单中心研究,于 2017 年 11 月至 2020 年 12 月在意大利博洛尼亚 IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria 进行。纳入在诊断性检查期间至少有一次 Ultra 痕量结果的疑似结核病患者。在痕量检测结果报告时正在接受抗结核治疗或无临床数据的患者排除在研究之外。
本研究纳入了 59 例 Ultra 痕量检测结果的疑似结核病患者(平均年龄 37.0 岁,61%为男性)。4 例患者在过去 2 年内有结核病病史。25 例(42.4%)59 例痕量检测结果样本为呼吸道标本。57/59(96.6%)例患者在获得痕量结果后,根据临床、影像学或其他现有信息很快开始抗结核治疗,而对于 2 例有近期结核病病史的患者,痕量结果未导致抗结核治疗。有痕量检测结果的 59 例样本中,培养结果为结核分枝杆菌阳性者 31 例(52.5%):25 例(52.0%)为呼吸道样本,18 例(54.5%)为非呼吸道样本。在接受抗结核治疗的 47/57(82.4%)例患者中,临床和/或影像学表现在治疗过程中得到改善。
在低结核病发病率环境下,疑似结核病患者的 Ultra 痕量检测结果应被视为真阳性,应迅速开始治疗,除非有近期结核病病史,否则在开始抗结核治疗之前需要仔细评估其他诊断标准。本研究提出了一种临床管理决策算法。