Laboratory of Integrative Neuroscience (LiNC), Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.
Laboratory of Integrative Neuroscience (LiNC), Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil; Early Psychosis Group (GAPi), Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.
J Affect Disord. 2022 Nov 1;316:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
Psychosis presentation can be affected by genetic and environmental factors. Differentiating between affective and non-affective psychosis (A-FEP and NA-FEP, respectively) may influence treatment decisions and clinical outcomes. The objective of this paper is to examine differences between patients with A-FEP or NA-FEP in a Latin American sample.
Patients from two cohorts of patients with a FEP recruited from Brazil and Chile. Subjects included were aged between 15 and 30 years, with an A-FEP or NA-FEP (schizophrenia-spectrum disorders) according to DSM-IV-TR. Sociodemographic data, duration of untreated psychosis and psychotic/mood symptoms were assessed. Generalized estimating equation models were used to assess clinical changes between baseline-follow-up according to diagnosis status.
A total of 265 subjects were included. Most of the subjects were male (70.9 %), mean age was 21.36 years. A-FEP and NA-FEP groups were similar in almost all sociodemographic variables, but A-FEP patients had a higher probability of being female. At baseline, the A-FEP group had more manic symptoms and a steeper reduction in manic symptoms scores during the follow- up. The NA-FEP group had more negative symptoms at baseline and a higher improvement during follow-up. All domains of The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale improved for both groups. No difference for DUP and depression z-scores at baseline and follow-up.
The sample was recruited at tertiary hospitals, which may bias the sample towards more severe cases.
This is the largest cohort comparing A-FEP and NA-FEP in Latin America. We found that features in FEP patients could be used to improve diagnosis and support treatment decisions.
精神病的表现可能受到遗传和环境因素的影响。区分情感性和非情感性精神病(分别为 A-FEP 和 NA-FEP)可能会影响治疗决策和临床结果。本文的目的是在拉丁美洲样本中检查 A-FEP 或 NA-FEP 患者之间的差异。
这项研究纳入了来自巴西和智利的两个 FEP 患者队列的患者。受试者年龄在 15 至 30 岁之间,根据 DSM-IV-TR 诊断为 A-FEP 或 NA-FEP(精神分裂症谱系障碍)。评估了社会人口统计学数据、未治疗精神病的持续时间以及精神病/情绪症状。使用广义估计方程模型根据诊断状态评估基线随访之间的临床变化。
共纳入 265 名受试者。大多数受试者为男性(70.9%),平均年龄为 21.36 岁。A-FEP 和 NA-FEP 组在几乎所有社会人口统计学变量方面均相似,但 A-FEP 患者中女性的比例更高。在基线时,A-FEP 组的躁狂症状更多,躁狂症状评分在随访期间下降幅度更大。NA-FEP 组在基线时有更多的阴性症状,在随访期间改善程度更高。两组的阳性和阴性综合征量表的所有领域均有所改善。基线和随访时的 DUP 和抑郁 z 评分无差异。
该样本是在三级医院招募的,这可能会使样本偏向更严重的病例。
这是拉丁美洲比较 A-FEP 和 NA-FEP 的最大队列。我们发现,FEP 患者的特征可用于改善诊断并支持治疗决策。