Suppr超能文献

拉丁美洲早期干预服务中的情感性和非情感性精神病的差异。

Differences of affective and non-affective psychoses in early intervention services from Latin America.

机构信息

Laboratory of Integrative Neuroscience (LiNC), Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.

Laboratory of Integrative Neuroscience (LiNC), Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil; Early Psychosis Group (GAPi), Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2022 Nov 1;316:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychosis presentation can be affected by genetic and environmental factors. Differentiating between affective and non-affective psychosis (A-FEP and NA-FEP, respectively) may influence treatment decisions and clinical outcomes. The objective of this paper is to examine differences between patients with A-FEP or NA-FEP in a Latin American sample.

METHODS

Patients from two cohorts of patients with a FEP recruited from Brazil and Chile. Subjects included were aged between 15 and 30 years, with an A-FEP or NA-FEP (schizophrenia-spectrum disorders) according to DSM-IV-TR. Sociodemographic data, duration of untreated psychosis and psychotic/mood symptoms were assessed. Generalized estimating equation models were used to assess clinical changes between baseline-follow-up according to diagnosis status.

RESULTS

A total of 265 subjects were included. Most of the subjects were male (70.9 %), mean age was 21.36 years. A-FEP and NA-FEP groups were similar in almost all sociodemographic variables, but A-FEP patients had a higher probability of being female. At baseline, the A-FEP group had more manic symptoms and a steeper reduction in manic symptoms scores during the follow- up. The NA-FEP group had more negative symptoms at baseline and a higher improvement during follow-up. All domains of The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale improved for both groups. No difference for DUP and depression z-scores at baseline and follow-up.

LIMITATIONS

The sample was recruited at tertiary hospitals, which may bias the sample towards more severe cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest cohort comparing A-FEP and NA-FEP in Latin America. We found that features in FEP patients could be used to improve diagnosis and support treatment decisions.

摘要

背景

精神病的表现可能受到遗传和环境因素的影响。区分情感性和非情感性精神病(分别为 A-FEP 和 NA-FEP)可能会影响治疗决策和临床结果。本文的目的是在拉丁美洲样本中检查 A-FEP 或 NA-FEP 患者之间的差异。

方法

这项研究纳入了来自巴西和智利的两个 FEP 患者队列的患者。受试者年龄在 15 至 30 岁之间,根据 DSM-IV-TR 诊断为 A-FEP 或 NA-FEP(精神分裂症谱系障碍)。评估了社会人口统计学数据、未治疗精神病的持续时间以及精神病/情绪症状。使用广义估计方程模型根据诊断状态评估基线随访之间的临床变化。

结果

共纳入 265 名受试者。大多数受试者为男性(70.9%),平均年龄为 21.36 岁。A-FEP 和 NA-FEP 组在几乎所有社会人口统计学变量方面均相似,但 A-FEP 患者中女性的比例更高。在基线时,A-FEP 组的躁狂症状更多,躁狂症状评分在随访期间下降幅度更大。NA-FEP 组在基线时有更多的阴性症状,在随访期间改善程度更高。两组的阳性和阴性综合征量表的所有领域均有所改善。基线和随访时的 DUP 和抑郁 z 评分无差异。

局限性

该样本是在三级医院招募的,这可能会使样本偏向更严重的病例。

结论

这是拉丁美洲比较 A-FEP 和 NA-FEP 的最大队列。我们发现,FEP 患者的特征可用于改善诊断并支持治疗决策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验