Ringen Amund Hovengen, Baksaas-Aasen Kjersti, Skaga Nils Oddvar, Wisborg Torben, Gaarder Christine, Naess Paal Aksel
Department of Traumatology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevaal, Oslo, Norway; Department of Anesthesia, Oslo University Hospital Ullevaal, PB 4950 Nydalen, Oslo 0424, Norway; Department of Research & Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Traumatology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevaal, Oslo, Norway; Department of Anesthesia, Oslo University Hospital Ullevaal, PB 4950 Nydalen, Oslo 0424, Norway; Department of Research & Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Injury. 2023 Jan;54(1):183-188. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.07.043. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
In line with international trends, initial treatment of trauma patients has changed substantially over the last two decades. Although trauma is the leading cause of death and disability in children globally, in-hospital pediatric trauma related mortality is expected to be low in a mature trauma system. To evaluate the performance of a major Scandinavian trauma center we assessed treatment strategies and outcomes in all pediatric trauma patients over a 16-year period.
A retrospective cohort study of all trauma patients under the age of 18 years admitted to a single institution from 1st of January 2003 to 31st of December 2018. Outcomes for two time periods were compared, 2003-2009 (Period 1; P1) and 2010-2018 (Period 2; P2). Deaths were further analyzed for preventability by the institutional trauma Mortality and Morbidity panel.
The study cohort consisted of 3939 patients. A total of 57 patients died resulting in a crude mortality of 1.4%, nearly one quarter of the study cohort (22.6%) was severely injured (Injury Severity Score > 15) and mortality in this group decreased from 9.7% in P1 to 4.1% in P2 (p<0.001). The main cause of death was brain injury in both periods, and 55 of 57 deaths were deemed non-preventable. The rate of emergency surgical procedures performed in the emergency department (ED) decreased during the study period. None of the 11 ED thoracotomies in non-survivors were performed after 2013.
A dedicated multidisciplinary trauma service with ongoing quality improvement efforts secured a low in-hospital mortality among severely injured children and a decrease in futile care. Deaths were shown to be almost exclusively non-preventable, pointing to the necessity of prioritizing prevention strategies to further decrease pediatric trauma related mortality.
与国际趋势一致,在过去二十年中,创伤患者的初始治疗发生了重大变化。尽管创伤是全球儿童死亡和残疾的主要原因,但在成熟的创伤系统中,院内儿科创伤相关死亡率预计较低。为了评估斯堪的纳维亚一个主要创伤中心的表现,我们评估了16年间所有儿科创伤患者的治疗策略和结果。
对2003年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间入住单一机构的所有18岁以下创伤患者进行回顾性队列研究。比较了两个时间段的结果,即2003 - 2009年(第1期;P1)和2010 - 2018年(第2期;P2)。机构创伤死亡率和发病率小组进一步分析了死亡的可预防性。
研究队列包括3939名患者。共有57名患者死亡,粗死亡率为1.4%,近四分之一的研究队列(22.6%)受重伤(损伤严重度评分>15),该组死亡率从P1期的9.7%降至P2期的4.1%(p<0.001)。两个时期的主要死亡原因均为脑损伤,57例死亡中有55例被认为是不可预防的。研究期间,急诊科进行的急诊手术率有所下降。2013年后,非幸存者中11例急诊开胸手术均未进行。
一个专门的多学科创伤服务团队持续进行质量改进工作,确保了重伤儿童的低院内死亡率,并减少了无效治疗。结果表明,死亡几乎完全是不可预防的,这表明有必要优先考虑预防策略,以进一步降低儿科创伤相关死亡率。