Head and Professor/Honorary Consultant Oral Surgeon, School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, UK.
Clinical Professor Emeritus, Department of Orthodontics, UIC College of Dentistry, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Br Dent J. 2022 Aug;233(3):232-233. doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-4501-6. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
In January 2019, the United States National Academy of Medicine initiated a comprehensive study of the status of current knowledge and clinical practices associated with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). The National Academy of Sciences, which includes the National Academy of Medicine, was chartered by the US Government in the late 1800s as a non-profit institution working outside of government in order to provide unbiased, objective opinions on matters including healthcare. In this brief paper, we will discuss the open access 2020 report Temporomandibular disorders: priorities for research and care, available online. While the main focus of this report was the situation of TMDs in the US, the evidence base, authorship, expertise and literature scope was international and the findings therefore are at least in part generalisable to and important for the UK.The authors of this commentary were directly involved in the National Academy process, with RO a panel member, JD a consultant and CG one of 15 reviewers of the draft report. There was a wide variety of clinical and research fields involved in gathering the evidence and constructing the report. In addition, there was extensive involvement from affected patients with TMDs and their families, which is critical because their perspective is typically omitted in textbooks and professional consensus meetings.
2019 年 1 月,美国国家医学科学院启动了一项关于颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)相关现有知识和临床实践状况的全面研究。美国国家科学院(包括国家医学科学院)是 19 世纪末由美国政府特许成立的一个非营利机构,旨在就医疗保健等问题提供公正、客观的意见。在这篇简短的论文中,我们将讨论可在线获取的、开放获取的 2020 年报告《颞下颌关节紊乱:研究和护理重点》。虽然该报告的主要重点是美国的 TMD 状况,但证据基础、作者、专业知识和文献范围是国际性的,因此研究结果至少部分适用于英国,对英国也很重要。本评论的作者直接参与了国家科学院的研究过程,RO 是一个小组的成员,JD 是顾问,CG 是报告草案的 15 名评审员之一。在收集证据和撰写报告方面涉及到广泛的临床和研究领域。此外,还得到了 TMD 患者及其家属的广泛参与,这一点至关重要,因为他们的观点通常在教科书和专业共识会议中被忽视。