Suppr超能文献

跨学科团队会议的实践:对 IDT、围绕护理交接的意义建构以及再入院率的观察性研究。

Interdisciplinary Team Meetings in Practice: an Observational Study of IDTs, Sensemaking Around Care Transitions, and Readmission Rates.

机构信息

South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.

University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(2):324-331. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07744-6. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interdisciplinary teams (IDTs) have been implemented to improve collaboration in hospital care, but their impact on patient outcomes, including readmissions, has been mixed. These mixed results might be rooted in differences in organization of IDT meetings between hospitals, as well as variation in IDT characteristics and function. We hypothesize that relationships between IDT members are an important team characteristic, influencing IDT function in terms of how members make sense of what is happening with patients, a process called sensemaking OBJECTIVE: (1) To describe how IDT meetings are organized in practice, (2) assess differences in IDT member relationships and sensemaking during patient discussions, and (3) explore their potential association with risk-stratified readmission rates (RSRRs).

DESIGN

Observational, explanatory convergent mixed-methods case-comparison study of IDT meetings in 10 Veterans Affairs hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Clinicians participating in IDTs and facility leadership.

APPROACH

Three-person teams observed and recorded IDT meetings during week-long visits. We used observational data to characterize relationships and sensemaking during IDT patient discussions. To assess sensemaking, we used 2 frameworks that reflected sensemaking around each patient's situation generally, and around care transitions specifically. We examined the association between IDT relationships and sensemaking, and RSRRs.

KEY RESULTS

We observed variability in IDT organization, characteristics, and function across 10 hospitals. This variability was greater between hospitals than between teams at the same hospital. Relationship characteristics and both types of sensemaking were all significantly, positively correlated. General sensemaking regarding each patient was significantly negatively associated with RSRR (- 0.65, p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

IDTs vary not only in how they are organized, but also in team relationships and sensemaking. Though our design does not allow for inferences of causation, these differences may be associated with hospital readmission rates.

摘要

背景

跨学科团队(IDT)已被引入以改善医院护理中的协作,但它们对患者结局(包括再入院率)的影响好坏参半。这些好坏参半的结果可能源于医院间 IDT 会议组织方式的差异,以及 IDT 特征和功能的变化。我们假设 IDT 成员之间的关系是一个重要的团队特征,会影响 IDT 成员对患者情况的理解能力,即所谓的意义建构过程。目的:(1)描述 IDT 会议的实际组织方式,(2)评估患者讨论过程中 IDT 成员关系和意义建构的差异,(3)探讨它们与风险分层再入院率(RSRR)之间的潜在关联。

设计

在 10 家退伍军人事务医院中进行的 IDT 会议的观察性、解释性、趋同混合方法病例对照研究。

参与者

参与 IDT 的临床医生和设施领导。

方法

三人小组在为期一周的访问期间观察并记录 IDT 会议。我们使用观察数据来描述 IDT 患者讨论过程中的关系和意义建构。为了评估意义建构,我们使用了两个框架,分别反映了每个患者情况的一般意义建构和特定于护理交接的意义建构。我们研究了 IDT 关系和意义建构与 RSRR 之间的关联。

主要结果

我们观察到 10 家医院的 IDT 组织、特征和功能存在差异。这种差异在医院之间比在同一医院的团队之间更大。关系特征和两种类型的意义建构都显著正相关。每个患者的一般意义建构与 RSRR 显著负相关(-0.65,p=0.044)。

结论

IDT 不仅在组织方式上存在差异,而且在团队关系和意义建构方面也存在差异。虽然我们的设计不允许进行因果推断,但这些差异可能与医院再入院率有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验