• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

HCG 和 GnRH 激动剂(双重触发)与标准 HCG 触发联合给药对胚胎形态动力学参数的影响。

Effect of the co-administration of HCG and GnRH agonist (dual trigger) versus standard HCG trigger on morphokinetic embryo parameters.

机构信息

Infertility and IVF Unit, Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva 4941492, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Infertility and IVF Unit, Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva 4941492, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Oct;45(4):696-702. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.05.013. Epub 2022 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.05.013
PMID:35963755
Abstract

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does dual trigger (the co-administration of triptorelin 0.2 mg and recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) [Decapeptyl 0.2 mg + Ovitrelle 250 µg]) versus standard recombinant HCG (Ovitrelle 250 µg) affect embryo quality and morphokinetic parameters?

DESIGN

Morphokinetic parameters and embryo quality of embryos derived from the first gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles triggered by dual trigger or standard HCG trigger in women ≤42 years. Outcome measures included time to pronucleus fading (tPNf), cleavage timings (t2-t8), synchrony of the second cycle (s2), duration of the second cycle (cc2) and known implantation data (KID) scoring for embryo quality. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were performed for confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 4859 embryos were analysed: 1803 embryos from 267 cycles in the dual trigger group and 3056 embryos from 463 cycles in the HCG trigger group. The groups were similar in patient and treatment characteristics apart from a higher maternal body mass index and lower maturation rate in the dual trigger group. Time to second polar body extrusion was shorter in the dual trigger group. Cleavage timings from zygote to an 8-cell embryo did not differ between the two groups. There was a higher percentage of embryos with an optimal cc2 duration in the HCG group. In multivariate logistic regression models, the trigger type was not a significant factor for cell cycle division parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there was no significant difference in the morphokinetic parameters or quality of embryos evaluated using a time-lapse monitoring system between embryos derived following dual trigger compared with HCG.

摘要

研究问题

双触发(三苯氧胺 0.2mg 和重组人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)[Decapeptyl 0.2mg+Ovitrelle 250μg]的联合给药)与标准重组 HCG(Ovitrelle 250μg)触发对胚胎质量和形态动力学参数有影响吗?

设计

在年龄≤42 岁的女性中,通过双触发或标准 HCG 触发 GnRH 拮抗剂 IVF/胞浆内精子注射(ICSI)周期获得的胚胎的形态动力学参数和胚胎质量。结局指标包括原核消失时间(tPNf)、卵裂时间(t2-t8)、第二周期同步性(s2)、第二周期持续时间(cc2)和胚胎质量的已知着床数据(KID)评分。对混杂因素进行了多变量线性和逻辑回归分析。

结果

共分析了 4859 个胚胎:双触发组 267 个周期的 1803 个胚胎和 HCG 触发组 463 个周期的 3056 个胚胎。除了双触发组的母体体重指数较高和成熟率较低外,两组患者和治疗特征相似。双触发组第二极体排出时间较短。从受精卵到 8 细胞胚胎的卵裂时间在两组之间没有差异。HCG 组具有最佳 cc2 持续时间的胚胎百分比更高。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,触发类型不是细胞周期分裂参数的显著因素。

结论

总体而言,使用时间 lapse 监测系统评估胚胎的形态动力学参数或质量,双触发与 HCG 相比,没有显著差异。

相似文献

1
Effect of the co-administration of HCG and GnRH agonist (dual trigger) versus standard HCG trigger on morphokinetic embryo parameters.HCG 和 GnRH 激动剂(双重触发)与标准 HCG 触发联合给药对胚胎形态动力学参数的影响。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Oct;45(4):696-702. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.05.013. Epub 2022 May 28.
2
A matched propensity score study of embryo morphokinetics following gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus human chorionic gonadotropin trigger.促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与绒毛膜促性腺激素扳机后胚胎形态动力学的配对倾向性评分研究。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Nov;37(11):2777-2782. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01953-w. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
3
Dual trigger with combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin significantly improves the live-birth rate for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles.促性腺激素释放激素激动剂和人绒毛膜促性腺激素双重触发可显著提高 GnRH 拮抗剂周期中正常反应者的活产率。
Fertil Steril. 2013 Nov;100(5):1296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1976. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
4
Ovulation triggering with hCG alone, GnRH agonist alone or in combination? A randomized controlled trial in advanced-age women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles.单用 hCG、单用 GnRH 激动剂还是联合应用?一项在接受 IVF/ICSI 周期治疗的高龄妇女中进行的随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Jul 30;37(8):1795-1805. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac114.
5
Reproductive outcomes of dual trigger with combination GnRH agonist and hCG versus trigger with hCG alone in women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching.双重触发(联合 GnRH 激动剂和 hCG 与单独 hCG 触发)与 IVF/ICSI 周期中单独使用 hCG 触发的女性的生殖结局:回顾性队列研究与倾向评分匹配。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jul 22;22(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04899-2.
6
Dual trigger with the combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and standard dose of human chorionic gonadotropin improves fertilisation outcomes in poor ovarian responders.双重触发,即使用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂和人绒毛膜促性腺激素标准剂量的联合治疗,可以改善卵巢反应不良患者的受精结局。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jul;42(5):1239-1244. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1945560. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
7
The risk of ectopic pregnancy following GnRH agonist triggering compared with hCG triggering in GnRH antagonist IVF cycles.在GnRH拮抗剂体外受精周期中,与hCG触发相比,GnRH激动剂触发后发生异位妊娠的风险。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jan;291(1):185-91. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3399-x. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
8
Dual trigger with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin significantly improves live birth rate for women with diminished ovarian reserve.双重触发:促性腺激素释放激素激动剂联合人绒毛膜促性腺激素显著提高卵巢储备功能减退患者的活产率。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019 Jan 4;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0451-x.
9
GnRH agonist versus HCG triggering in different IVF/ICSI cycles of same patients: a retrospective study.促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与绒毛膜促性腺激素触发在不同患者的体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射周期中的应用:一项回顾性研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Aug;40(6):837-842. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1674262. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
10
Comparison of dual trigger with combination GnRH agonist and hCG versus hCG alone trigger of oocyte maturation for normal ovarian responders.比较双重触发与 GnRH 激动剂和 hCG 联合与单独使用 hCG 触发正常卵巢反应者卵母细胞成熟的效果。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Jun;141(3):327-331. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12457. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Embryo division timings and top-quality embryo rates in GnRH-Antagonist ICSI cycles: a comparison of hCG and dual trigger methods.促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案卵胞浆内单精子注射周期中的胚胎分裂时间及优质胚胎率:人绒毛膜促性腺激素与双重扳机方法的比较
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03601-7.
2
Reproductive outcomes of dual trigger therapy with GnRH agonist and hCG versus hCG trigger in women with diminished ovarian reserve: a retrospective study.双重触发疗法(GnRH 激动剂和 hCG 与 hCG 扳机)与 hCG 扳机在卵巢储备功能下降患者中的生殖结局比较:一项回顾性研究。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Apr 2;22(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01211-z.