Department of Medical Simulation, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Department of Pathophysiology of Locomotor Organs, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2022;40(3):125-135. doi: 10.3233/RNN-211237.
Traditional repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) remains applicable in speech studies on healthy participants. Although the procedure of inducing speech arrest by rTMS has been used for over 25 years, there are still significant discrepancies in its methodology.
The study aimed to simplify and improve the old methodology of triggering speech arrest by (rTMS). Our goal was to establish the best step-by-step algorithm and verify the procedure on a representative group of participants.
47 healthy, right-handed volunteers (23 men and 24 women) at a median age of 23 (range 19-34) were included in the study. Handedness was determined using the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory Test. After setting the individual's motor threshold (MT) and heuristic choice of the place of stimulation, which targeted Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG), participants were asked to count downwards from 20 to 10. While counting, a series of 2-second pulses was generated at a frequency of 2 Hz at 120% or 150% of MT. The procedure was video-recorded and subsequently assessed by 3 independent reviewers and self-assessed by participants on visual analogue scales for the effect and comfort of stimulation.
Speech arrest was induced in 45 people (95.7%). Language dominance was determined to be either left-sided (for 42.2%) or bilateral (55.3%). Total speech arrest was observed more often in participants for whom Broca's area was active exclusively in the left hemisphere.
In our study, we present the step-by-step procedure for a simplified, as far as possible, methodology of inducing speech arrest using rTMS with its verification on a representative group of right-handed healthy individuals. Our results prove that the chosen stimulation parameters present a good efficacy ratio and seems to be justified. The traditional applications of rTMS in speech studies may be highly broadened if the methods used are further improved and simplified.
传统的重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)仍然适用于健康参与者的言语研究。虽然 rTMS 诱导言语阻滞的程序已经使用了超过 25 年,但它的方法仍然存在很大的差异。
本研究旨在简化和改进 rTMS 触发言语阻滞的旧方法。我们的目标是建立最佳的逐步算法,并在代表性的参与者群体中验证该程序。
本研究纳入了 47 名健康的右利手志愿者(23 名男性和 24 名女性),平均年龄为 23 岁(19-34 岁)。使用爱丁堡手性测试确定手性。在确定个体的运动阈值(MT)和刺激部位的启发式选择(靶向额下回(IFG))后,参与者被要求从 20 倒数到 10。在计数的同时,以 120%或 150%的 MT 频率产生一系列 2 秒的脉冲,频率为 2Hz。该过程被视频记录,随后由 3 名独立评审员进行评估,并由参与者根据视觉模拟量表评估刺激的效果和舒适度进行自我评估。
45 人(95.7%)诱导言语阻滞。语言优势被确定为左侧(42.2%)或双侧(55.3%)。Broca 区仅在左半球活跃的参与者中,总言语阻滞更常见。
在我们的研究中,我们提出了一种简化的、尽可能简化的 rTMS 诱导言语阻滞的分步程序,并在一组有代表性的右利手健康个体中对其进行了验证。我们的结果证明,所选的刺激参数具有良好的疗效比,似乎是合理的。如果进一步改进和简化所使用的方法,rTMS 在言语研究中的传统应用可能会得到极大的扩展。