Ali Islam E, Hattori Mariko, Sumita Yuka I, Wakabayashi Noriyuki
Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
J Prosthodont. 2023 Jul;32(6):527-533. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13591. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the rescanning of mesh holes of different diameters on the accuracy of an intraoral scanner (IOS) used to digitize an ear model.
An ear model was digitized using an intraoral scanner (Medit i500) to obtain a reference mesh. A baseline experimental scan was created by editing a duplicate of the reference mesh using the cut-out tool of the IOS software. Three equal groups were created based on the diameter of the cut-out areas: 2 mm (G1), 5 mm (G2), and 8 mm (G3) (n = 15). The cut-out areas were rescanned and a total of 45 digital files were exported. The discrepancy between the reference and the experimental digital scans was measured using the root mean square calculation (RMS). The data were analyzed by a Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a post hoc Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction.
The trueness values ranged from 19.53 to 27.13 µm. There were significant differences in the RMS error values among the groups tested (p < 0.001) and post hoc multiple comparisons showed significant differences between the G1 and G2 groups (p = 0.04), G1 and G3 groups (p < 0.001), and G2 and G3 groups (p = 0.004). Overall, the precision values ranged from 4.93 to 7.73 µm and significant differences in the RMS values were only found between the G1 and G2 groups (p = 0.014).
Mesh hole rescanning affected the scanning accuracy (trueness and precision) of the IOS tested. The larger the diameter of the mesh holes, the less the trueness of the IOS tested. The precision values seemed to be less affected compared with the trueness by the cut-out and rescanning procedures.
本研究旨在评估重新扫描不同直径的网格孔对用于数字化耳部模型的口腔内扫描仪(IOS)准确性的影响。
使用口腔内扫描仪(Medit i500)对耳部模型进行数字化处理以获得参考网格。通过使用IOS软件的裁剪工具编辑参考网格的副本创建基线实验扫描。根据裁剪区域的直径创建三个相等的组:2毫米(G1)、5毫米(G2)和8毫米(G3)(n = 15)。对裁剪区域进行重新扫描并导出总共45个数字文件。使用均方根计算(RMS)测量参考数字扫描与实验数字扫描之间的差异。数据通过Kruskal-Wallis检验进行分析,随后进行带有Bonferroni校正的事后Dunn检验。
真实值范围为19.53至27.13微米。测试组之间的RMS误差值存在显著差异(p < 0.001),事后多重比较显示G1和G2组之间存在显著差异(p = 0.04),G1和G3组之间存在显著差异(p < 0.001),G2和G3组之间存在显著差异(p = 0.004)。总体而言,精度值范围为4.93至7.73微米,仅在G1和G2组之间发现RMS值存在显著差异(p = 0.014)。
网格孔重新扫描影响了所测试IOS的扫描准确性(真实度和精度)。网格孔直径越大,所测试IOS的真实度越低。与真实度相比,精度值似乎受裁剪和重新扫描程序的影响较小。