Suppr超能文献

《主动式活动监视器(activPAL)测量踏步行为和活动强度的有效性:系统评价》。

Validity of the activPAL monitor to measure stepping activity and activity intensity: A systematic review.

机构信息

Division of Kinesiology, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Faculty of Professional Studies, School of Kinesiology, Acadia University, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2022 Sep;97:165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accumulating step counts and engaging in moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity is positively associated with numerous health benefits. The activPAL is a thigh-worn monitor that is frequently used to measure physical activity.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can the activPAL accurately measure stepping activity and identify physical activity intensity?

METHODS

We systematically reviewed validation studies examining the accuracy of activPAL physical activity outcomes relative to a criterion measure in adults (>18 years). Citations were not restricted to language or date of publication. Sources were searched up to May 16, 2021 and included Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Academic Search Premier. The study was pre-registered in Prospero (ID# CRD42021248240). Study quality was determined using a modified Hagströmer Bowles checklist.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies (20 laboratory arms, 17 semi-structured arms, 11 uncontrolled protocol arms; 1272 total participants) met the inclusion criteria. Most studies demonstrated a high validity of the activPAL to measure steps across laboratory (12/15 arms), semi-structured (10/13 arms) and uncontrolled conditions (5/7 arms). Studies that demonstrated low validity were generally conducted in unhealthy populations, included slower walking speeds, and/or short walking distances. Few studies indicated that the activPAL accurately measured physical activity intensity across laboratory (0/6 arms), semi-structured (0/5 arms) and uncontrolled conditions (2/5 arms). Using the default settings, the activPAL overestimates light-intensity activity but underestimates moderate-to-vigorous intensity activity. The overall study quality was 11.5 ± 2.0 out of 19.

CONCLUSION

Despite heterogeneous methodological and statistical approaches, the included studies generally provide supporting evidence that the activPAL can accurately detect stepping activity but not physical activity intensity. Strategies that use alternative data processing methods have been developed to better characterize physical activity intensity, but all methods still underestimate vigorous-intensity activity.

摘要

背景

累计步数和进行中等到剧烈强度的身体活动与许多健康益处呈正相关。activPAL 是一种佩戴在大腿上的监测器,常用于测量身体活动。

研究问题

activPAL 能否准确测量步数活动并识别身体活动强度?

方法

我们系统地回顾了评估 activPAL 身体活动结果准确性的验证研究,这些研究相对于成人(>18 岁)的标准测量方法。引文不受语言或出版日期的限制。截至 2021 年 5 月 16 日,对 Scopus、EMBASE、MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 Academic Search Premier 进行了来源搜索。该研究在 Prospero 中进行了预先注册(ID#CRD42021248240)。使用改良的 Hagströmer Bowles 清单确定研究质量。

结果

符合纳入标准的研究有 39 项(20 项实验室手臂、17 项半结构化手臂、11 项不受控制的协议手臂;共 1272 名参与者)。大多数研究表明 activPAL 在实验室(12/15 个手臂)、半结构化(10/13 个手臂)和不受控制的条件下(5/7 个手臂)高度准确地测量步数。验证结果较低的研究通常在不健康人群中进行,包括较慢的步行速度和/或较短的步行距离。很少有研究表明 activPAL 在实验室(0/6 个手臂)、半结构化(0/5 个手臂)和不受控制的条件下(2/5 个手臂)准确测量身体活动强度。使用默认设置,activPAL 会高估低强度活动,但低估中等到剧烈强度活动。总的研究质量为 19 分中的 11.5±2.0 分。

结论

尽管方法学和统计学方法存在差异,但纳入的研究通常提供了支持证据,表明 activPAL 可以准确检测步数活动,但不能检测身体活动强度。已经开发了使用替代数据处理方法的策略来更好地描述身体活动强度,但所有方法仍低估剧烈强度活动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验