Suppr超能文献

雨季荷斯坦和荷斯坦×吉尔小母牛在集约管理的热带草场上的采食、生产性能和采食行为。

Intake, performance, and feeding behavior of Holstein and Holstein × Gyr heifers grazing intensively managed tropical grasses during the rainy season.

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000 Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil.

Department of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, 99164 Pullman, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Animal. 2022 Sep;16(9):100613. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100613. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

Abstract

Holstein × Gyr and Holstein are the primary dairy breeds used in tropical systems, but when rearing under pasture, feed intake, behavior, and performance might differ between them. This study aimed to evaluate the voluntary intake, nutrient digestibility, performance, and ingestive behavior of Holstein and Holstein × Gyr (½ Holstein × ½ Gyr) heifers managed in a rotational system of Guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq. cv. Mombaça). The experiment was conducted during the summer season throughout four periods of 21 d. Two 8-heifers (four Holstein and four Holstein × Gyr) groups, averaging 258.6 ± 24.79 kg and 157.1 ± 24.99 kg BW, were used. Each group grazed a separate set of 16 paddocks, and all heifers received a concentrate supplement daily. Heifers were weighed at the beginning and end of the experiment. Fecal, forage and concentrate samples were evaluated for their DM, CP, crude fat, ash, NDF, and indigestible NDF. Feeding behavior was evaluated through 24 h of live observation for 48 h of each experimental period. Grazing, ruminating, resting, and intake of concentrate times were recorded, and rumination criteria, bout criteria, mealtime, meal frequency, and meal duration were calculated. There was no difference in total dry matter intake (DMI), but forage DMI of Holstein × Gyr was 11.70 % greater than the Holstein heifers. The Holstein × Gyr heifers had greater NDF intake and feed efficiency tended to show greater CP and NDF digestibilities, consequently, they had greater average daily gain (ADG). Holstein grazed less than Holstein × Gyr heifers in the afternoon. Ruminating time was 18.43 % lower for Holstein than Holstein × Gyr heifers, and rumination criteria (i.e. longest non-feeding interval within a rumination event) were greater for Holstein heifers. Holstein heifers presented more prolonged rumination bouts and resting time than Holstein × Gyr heifers. Holstein × Gyr can ingest and ruminate greater amounts of fibrous material, and Holstein heifers needed to spend more time ruminating the cud. Overall, even though the behavior was not markedly different between breeds, rearing young Holstein heifers in tropical pasture conditions is less suitable than Holstein-Gyr because of their lower ADG. Therefore, this management condition seems appropriate for Holstein × Gyr but inappropriate for Holstein dairy heifers.

摘要

荷斯坦牛和荷斯坦-更赛牛是热带系统中主要的奶牛品种,但在放牧条件下饲养时,它们的采食量、行为和性能可能存在差异。本研究旨在评估荷斯坦牛和荷斯坦-更赛牛(½荷斯坦牛×½更赛牛)后备牛在轮牧体系下采食、养分消化率、生产性能和采食行为的差异,该试验在夏季进行了四个 21d 的周期。每组 8 头后备牛(4 头荷斯坦牛和 4 头荷斯坦-更赛牛),平均体重 258.6±24.79kg 和 157.1±24.99kgBW,每头牛放牧于一个单独的 16 个小区,所有后备牛每天都接受浓缩饲料补充。在试验开始和结束时对后备牛进行称重。对粪便、牧草和精料样本进行干物质(DM)、粗蛋白(CP)、粗脂肪、灰分、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)和不消化 NDF 分析。通过 24h 的连续观察,在每个试验期的 48h 内评估采食行为。记录采食、反刍、休息和精料采食时间,并计算反刍时间、反刍时间、采食时间、采食频率和采食持续时间。总干物质采食量(DMI)没有差异,但荷斯坦-更赛牛的牧草 DMI 比荷斯坦牛高 11.70%。荷斯坦-更赛牛的 NDF 采食量较高,饲料效率也有提高的趋势,其 CP 和 NDF 消化率也较高,因此,荷斯坦-更赛牛的平均日增重(ADG)更高。荷斯坦牛下午的放牧时间比荷斯坦-更赛牛少。荷斯坦牛的反刍时间比荷斯坦-更赛牛低 18.43%,且反刍时间标准(即反刍事件中最长的无采食间隔)更长。荷斯坦牛的反刍持续时间和休息时间比荷斯坦-更赛牛长。荷斯坦-更赛牛可以采食和反刍更多的纤维物质,而荷斯坦牛需要更多的时间反刍。总的来说,尽管品种间的行为没有明显差异,但在热带牧场条件下饲养年轻的荷斯坦牛不如饲养荷斯坦-更赛牛合适,因为荷斯坦牛的 ADG 较低。因此,这种管理条件似乎更适合荷斯坦-更赛牛,而不适合荷斯坦奶牛后备牛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验