Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(12):4467-77. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4643. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
Mixed livestock grazing can offer an alternative management system for rearing dairy replacement heifers (Bos taurus). A 2-yr study was conducted during 2009 (yr 1) and 2010 (yr 2) to determine the effects of co-grazing Holstein heifers under rotational stocking with Boer × Kiko goats on animal performance, pasture DM yield, and botanical composition. Each year, 24 heifers (134 ± 6 d of age and 147.4 ± 31.2 kg BW in yr 1; 166 ± 11 d of age and 168.0 ± 27.6 kg BW in yr 2) and 6 goats (2 yr old and 39.7 ± 16.2 kg BW in yr 1; 1 yr old and 33.7 ± 7.4 kg BW in yr 2) were divided into 6 paddocks with 4 heifers and 2 goats, where applicable, per group. Low endophyte-infected tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and white clover (Trifolium repens L.) pastures were used to evaluate 2 grazing strategies (heifers grazed alone [HO] or heifers co-grazed with goats [HG]). In addition, 6 goats were assigned to 2 paddocks and grazed alone (GO) each year to estimate goat pasture forage intake and compare Haemonchus contortus infection to co-grazed goats. Forage samples were taken monthly to assess DM yield and botanical composition. Samples collected for botanical composition were manually sorted into grass, legume, and weed species. Forage DMI was estimated using a rising plate meter before and after grazing. Heifer BW at the conclusion of yr 1 and yr 2 did not differ between HO and HG (P = 0.40 and P = 0.12, respectively). Likewise, overall ADG did not differ between HO and HG, averaging 0.65 kg/d and 0.63 kg/d over both grazing seasons (P = 0.70). Grazing strategy did not affect forage or total DMI in yr 1; however, HO consumed 2.3 kg/d more forage DM than HG (P < 0.01), resulting in greater total DMI for HO in yr 2 (P < 0.01). Heights at the hip and withers were greater for HO than for HG during both grazing seasons (P < 0.05). Weed presence did not differ between grazing strategies over both grazing seasons as determined by manual harvesting, but visual estimation of botanical composition at the end of yr 2 showed that HO paddocks had 3.5 times more weed presence than HG pastures (P < 0.01). Within the confines of this study, co-grazing did not affect overall heifer BW gain, but it decreased DMI, suggesting that dairy heifers can be co-grazed with goats without negative effects on ADG or feed efficiency.
混合牲畜放牧可为饲养奶牛替代小母牛(Bos taurus)提供一种替代管理系统。在 2009 年(第 1 年)和 2010 年(第 2 年)进行了为期 2 年的研究,以确定在轮牧制度下,荷斯坦小母牛与波尔山羊 × 基库山羊共同放牧对动物性能、牧场干物质产量和植物组成的影响。每年,24 头小母牛(第 1 年为 134 ± 6 日龄和 147.4 ± 31.2 kg BW;第 2 年为 166 ± 11 日龄和 168.0 ± 27.6 kg BW)和 6 只山羊(2 岁,体重 39.7 ± 16.2 kg BW 第 1 年;1 岁,体重 33.7 ± 7.4 kg BW 第 2 年)被分成 6 个畜栏,每组 4 头小母牛和 2 只山羊。使用低内生真菌感染的高羊茅(Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)和白三叶草(Trifolium repens L.)牧场来评估 2 种放牧策略(小母牛单独放牧 [HO]或小母牛与山羊共同放牧 [HG])。此外,每年将 6 只山羊分配到 2 个畜栏中单独放牧(GO),以估计山羊牧场的草料摄入量,并将其与共同放牧的山羊的旋毛虫感染进行比较。每月采集草料样本以评估干物质产量和植物组成。收集植物组成样本,通过手动分拣成草、豆科和杂草种类。在放牧前后使用升降板计估计草料摄入量。第 1 年和第 2 年结束时,HO 和 HG 之间的小母牛 BW 没有差异(P = 0.40 和 P = 0.12,分别)。同样,HO 和 HG 之间的平均日增重(ADG)没有差异,两个放牧季节的平均 ADG 分别为 0.65 kg/d 和 0.63 kg/d(P = 0.70)。在第 1 年,放牧策略不影响草料或总 DMI;然而,HO 比 HG 多消耗 2.3 kg/d 的干物质,导致第 2 年 HO 的总 DMI 更高(P < 0.01)。在两个放牧季节中,HO 的臀部和肩部高度都大于 HG(P < 0.05)。通过手动收获,两个放牧季节的杂草出现率在放牧策略之间没有差异,但在第 2 年年末对植物组成进行的目测估计表明,HO 畜栏的杂草出现率比 HG 牧场高 3.5 倍(P < 0.01)。在本研究的范围内,共同放牧对小母牛的总体 BW 增重没有影响,但它降低了 DMI,这表明可以与山羊共同放牧奶牛小母牛,而不会对 ADG 或饲料效率产生负面影响。