Ortega-Castillo Miguel, Cuesta-Vargas Antonio, Luque-Teba Antonio, Trinidad-Fernández Manuel
Department of Physiotherapy, Clinimetric Group F-14, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), University of Malaga, 29010, Málaga, Spain.
Department of Physiotherapy, Clinimetric Group F-14, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), University of Malaga, 29010, Málaga, Spain; School of Clinical Science, Queensland University Technology, Brisbane, 4072, Australia. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/aicuesta.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022 Dec;62:102645. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102645. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
Among upper limb tendinopathies, rotator cuff-related shoulder pain and lateral elbow tendinopathy are the most representative disorders. Therapeutic exercise arises as an effective approach, but there is no consensus about the optimal progression criteria.
To compare progression criteria and effectiveness of isolated, progressive exercises in the management of upper limb tendinopathies. Additionally, to perform a meta-analysis of pain/function for the selected programs.
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Database search of randomized-controlled-trials including progressive exercise was conducted in PubMed and Scopus until October 2020. Meta-analysis' inclusion criteria were: no data duplicity; 3-months follow-up; comparison between any type of progressive exercise program. Risk of bias was assessed with PEDro score, and level of evidence followed GRADE guidelines. Effect size was calculated with Cohen's d.
Eleven studies were included. GRADE revealed low-quality evidence for meta-analysis of pain during activity (d = 0.29) and function (d = 0.33) at 3 months. Progression criteria were categorised into two divisions, being pain the central concept. Pain (rest/activity/night) and function improved significantly within-group, but between-group changes were heterogeneous. Meta-analysis regarding pain showed good homogeneity with significant, moderate effects (I = 20%; p = 0.005; mean d = 0.29); function yielded important heterogeneity with non-significant, moderate effects (I = 81%; p = 0.17; mean d = 0.33).
Pain was the most frequent benchmark when modulating and progressing the exercises, although other criteria were found such as fatigue or self-perceived ability. Progressive exercise seems effective to manage upper limb tendinopathies, but the superiority of a progression criterion against others remains unclear. Low-quality evidence supported progressive exercise with eccentric components in adding a significant and moderate effect on pain/function at short-term.
在上肢肌腱病中,肩袖相关的肩部疼痛和外侧肘肌腱病是最具代表性的病症。治疗性运动是一种有效的方法,但对于最佳进展标准尚无共识。
比较孤立性渐进性运动在治疗上肢肌腱病中的进展标准和有效性。此外,对所选方案的疼痛/功能进行荟萃分析。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
在PubMed和Scopus数据库中检索截至2020年10月的包括渐进性运动的随机对照试验。荟萃分析的纳入标准为:无数据重复;随访3个月;任何类型的渐进性运动方案之间的比较。采用PEDro评分评估偏倚风险,证据水平遵循GRADE指南。效应量用Cohen's d计算。
纳入11项研究。GRADE显示,在3个月时,活动期间疼痛(d = 0.29)和功能(d = 0.33)的荟萃分析证据质量低。进展标准分为两类,疼痛是核心概念。疼痛(休息/活动/夜间)和功能在组内显著改善,但组间变化存在异质性。关于疼痛的荟萃分析显示出良好的同质性,具有显著的中度效应(I = 20%;p = 0.005;平均d = 0.29);功能产生了重要的异质性,具有不显著的中度效应(I = 81%;p = 0.17;平均d = 0.33)。
在调整和推进运动时,疼痛是最常见的基准,尽管还发现了其他标准,如疲劳或自我感知能力。渐进性运动似乎对治疗上肢肌腱病有效,但一种进展标准相对于其他标准的优越性仍不清楚。低质量证据支持在短期内,含有离心成分的渐进性运动对疼痛/功能有显著的中度影响。