Health Sciences Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe. R. Cláudio Batista - Palestina, nº 676, zip code: 49060-025. Aracaju, SE, Brazil.
Psychology Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe. Cidade Universitária Prof. José Aloísio de Campos, Avenida Marechal Rondon, s/n - Jardim Rosa Elze, zip code: 49100-000. São Cristóvão, SE, Brazil.
J Pain. 2022 Dec;23(12):2013-2035. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
The effectiveness of electrical stimulation (ES) in preventing or treating delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) and its effects on muscle recovery is unclear. The systematic review investigated the benefits or harms of ES on DOMS and muscle recovery. Databases (PubMed, Medline, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PEDro, LILACS, SPORTDiscus) were searched up to March, 31st 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of athletes or untrained adults with DOMS treated with ES and compared to placebo/sham (simulation or without ES), or control (no intervention). Data were pooled in a meta-analysis. Risk of bias (Cochrane Collaboration tool) and quality of evidence (GRADE) were analyzed. Fourteen trials (n=435) were included in this review and 12 trials (n=389) were pooled in a meta-analysis. Evidence of very low to low quality indicates that ES does not prevent or treat DOMS as well as ES does not help to promote muscle recovery immediately, 24, 48, 72, 96 hours after the intervention. Only one study monitored adverse events. There are no recommendations that support the use of ES in DOMS and muscle recovery. PERSPECTIVES: No recommendations support the use of electrical stimulation in delayed-onset muscle soreness and muscle recovery in athletes and untrained adults. This means that electrical stimulation is not fruitful for this population according those protocols used. Therefore, unlikely that further randomized controlled trials with the same approach will yield promising results.
电刺激(ES)在预防或治疗延迟性肌肉酸痛(DOMS)及其对肌肉恢复的影响方面的效果尚不清楚。本系统评价调查了 ES 对 DOMS 和肌肉恢复的益处或危害。检索了截至 2021 年 3 月 31 日的数据库(PubMed、Medline、CENTRAL、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、PEDro、LILACS、SPORTDiscus),以寻找接受 ES 治疗的 DOMS 运动员或未经训练的成年人的随机对照试验(RCT),并与安慰剂/假(模拟或无 ES)或对照组(无干预)进行比较。对数据进行了荟萃分析。分析了偏倚风险(Cochrane 协作工具)和证据质量(GRADE)。本综述纳入了 14 项试验(n=435),其中 12 项试验(n=389)进行了荟萃分析。证据质量为极低至低,表明 ES 既不能预防也不能治疗 DOMS,ES 也不能帮助促进肌肉在干预后 24、48、72、96 小时的即刻恢复。只有一项研究监测了不良事件。没有推荐意见支持在 DOMS 和肌肉恢复中使用 ES。观点:没有推荐意见支持在运动员和未经训练的成年人的延迟性肌肉酸痛和肌肉恢复中使用电刺激。这意味着根据这些使用方案,电刺激对这些人群没有效果。因此,不太可能有相同方法的进一步随机对照试验产生有希望的结果。