Pinger Mathieu, Thome Janine, Halli Patrick, Sommer Wolfgang H, Koppe Georgia, Kirsch Peter
Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Theoretical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Jul 28;16:867202. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.867202. eCollection 2022.
Delay discounting (DD) has often been investigated in the context of decision making whereby individuals attribute decreasing value to rewards in the distant future. Less is known about DD in the context of negative consequences. The aim of this pilot study was to identify commonalities and differences between reward and loss discounting on the behavioral as well as the neural level by means of computational modeling and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). We furthermore compared the neural activation between anticipation of rewards and losses.
We conducted a study combining an intertemporal choice task for potentially real rewards and losses (decision-making) with a monetary incentive/loss delay task (reward/loss anticipation). Thirty healthy participants (age 18-35, 14 female) completed the study. In each trial, participants had to choose between a smaller immediate loss/win and a larger loss/win at a fixed delay of two weeks. Task-related brain activation was measured with fMRI.
Hyperbolic discounting parameters of loss and reward conditions were correlated ( = 0.56). During decision-making, BOLD activation was observed in the parietal and prefrontal cortex, with no differences between reward and loss conditions. During reward and loss anticipation, dissociable activation was observed in the striatum, the anterior insula and the anterior cingulate cortex.
We observed behavior concurrent with DD in both the reward and loss condition, with evidence for similar behavioral and neural patterns in the two conditions. Intertemporal decision-making recruited the fronto-parietal network, whilst reward and loss anticipation were related to activation in the salience network. The interpretation of these findings may be limited to short delays and small monetary outcomes.
延迟折扣(DD)通常在决策背景下进行研究,即个体认为远期奖励的价值会降低。在负面后果背景下对延迟折扣的了解较少。本试点研究的目的是通过计算建模和功能磁共振成像(fMRI),在行为和神经层面识别奖励折扣与损失折扣之间的异同。我们还比较了奖励预期与损失预期之间的神经激活情况。
我们开展了一项研究,将针对潜在实际奖励与损失的跨期选择任务(决策)与金钱激励/损失延迟任务(奖励/损失预期)相结合。30名健康参与者(年龄18 - 35岁,14名女性)完成了该研究。在每次试验中,参与者必须在较小的即时损失/收益与两周固定延迟后的较大损失/收益之间做出选择。通过fMRI测量与任务相关的大脑激活情况。
损失和奖励条件下的双曲线折扣参数具有相关性(r = 0.56)。在决策过程中,在顶叶和前额叶皮层观察到血氧水平依赖(BOLD)激活,奖励和损失条件之间无差异。在奖励和损失预期过程中,在纹状体、前岛叶和前扣带回皮层观察到可分离的激活。
我们在奖励和损失条件下均观察到与延迟折扣一致的行为,有证据表明两种条件下存在相似的行为和神经模式。跨期决策激活了额顶网络,而奖励和损失预期与突显网络的激活有关。这些发现的解释可能仅限于短延迟和小额金钱结果。