Hong Insu, Wilson Bradley, Gross Thomson, Conley Jamison, Powers Theodore
CJ Logistics, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, 98 Beechurst Ave Morgantown, 26505 WV Morgantown, USA.
Appl Spat Anal Policy. 2023;16(1):141-161. doi: 10.1007/s12061-022-09472-0. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
Existing measures of health care access were inadequate for guiding policy decisions in West Virginia, as they identified the entire state as having limited access. To address this, we compiled a comprehensive database of primary health care providers and facilities in the state, developed a modified E2SFCA tool to measure spatial access in the context of West Virginia's rural and mountainous nature, and integrated this with an index of socio-economic barriers to access. The integrated index revealed that the rural areas, especially in the southern part of the state, have especially limited access to primary health care. 1. Introduction. An emerging public health issue which has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, is that of , which are places where basic affordable health care is not accessible for residents. This problem has become worse in rural areas as rural hospitals close. In these areas, including West Virginia, scattered populations suffer from limited access to primary healthcare services. Uneven geographic and socio-economic barriers to accessing primary health care are major contributing factors to these health disparities. West Virginia's unique rural and mountainous settlement patterns, aging population, and economic crisis over the past two decades have resulted in unequal access to the primary healthcare services for its residents. The rural nature of the state makes it difficult to maintain medical facilities accessible to much of the population, especially as rural hospitals have been closing, such as the one in Williamson, WV (Jarvie, 2020). The mountainous terrain slows down travel across winding roads, lengthening travel times to the nearest hospital, while an aging population has increased health care needs. Lastly, an economic crisis and higher poverty rate makes West Virginians less able to pay for health care. As a result, West Virginians are confronting a health crisis. According to a recent report by the West Virginia Health Statistics Center (2019), West Virginians rank first in the country for heart attacks, have the second-highest obesity rate and prevalence of mental health problems in the country, along with the fourth-highest rate of diabetes and fifth-highest rate of cancer. An issue faced by West Virginia's policymakers is the limitations of tools for identifying and assessing healthcare deserts, as they are poorly suited for the unique challenges in West Virginia. Academic research has not analyzed comprehensive primary healthcare accessibility in WV, although previous studies have focused on Appalachia (e.g., Behringer & Friedell 2006; Smith & Holloman, 2011; Elnicki et al., 1995; Donohoe et al., 2015, 2016a, 2016b), and others focus on access to more specialized services (Valvi et al., 2019; Donohoe, 2016a). Existing approaches to identify the healthcare deprived areas, such as Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSA), are not suitable for guiding West Virginia policies, because every one of the 55 counties within the state has several HPSAs, which makes prioritizing resources difficult. The lack of easily accessible, comprehensive, and up-to-date physician and healthcare facility database creates additional difficulties. Physician license datasets were found to often include inconsistent, misleading, and out-of-date information. The last limitation of the HPSA designation is that it is based on zip code areas and census tracts, which are not ideal as zip code areas lack spatial context and much covariate data, while rural census tracts are too large to capture spatial variation of access. In this context, the WV HealthLink project was begun with joint effort with WV Rural Health Initiative (RHI) to fill gaps in research and support decision making for primary healthcare access in West Virginia. The goals of the projects are: (1) to help West Virginia's three medical schools provide specialized professional training in rural healthcare; (2) to address health disparities by investing in clinical projects in underserved areas; and (3) to retain health professionals in WV. In 2018, to support these goals, HealthLink was invited by the RHI's leadership to analyze disparities in primary health care access in West Virginia and develop tools for rural healthcare decision-making. These goals also create a comprehensive and up-to-date physician and facility database, new analysis tools, and new visualization tools for decision support. The goals of this paper are to assess the spatial and social accessibility of primary health care in West Virginia, and to understand spatial and social determinants that shape this access. To achieve these goals, this paper completes the following objectives: (1) define primary healthcare and access; (2) build an extensive and up-to-date primary healthcare database; (3) develop an assessment framework for WV; and (4) visualize the results for policy makers and practitioners. The structure of this paper is as follows. First, we describe three methodological problems encountered as we define primary health care access. Second, we present the methods used to resolve these problems, and conclude by presenting our modified enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2FCA hereafter) approach and its results for WV. Our foci in this modification were improving the accuracy of the analysis regarding measuring distance, considering distance decay effect, and more precisely representing the location of supply and demand.
现有的医疗保健可及性衡量指标不足以指导西弗吉尼亚州的政策决策,因为这些指标将整个州都认定为可及性有限。为解决这一问题,我们编制了该州初级医疗保健提供者和设施的综合数据库,开发了一种经过改进的E2SFCA工具,以衡量西弗吉尼亚州农村和山区环境下的空间可及性,并将其与获取医疗服务的社会经济障碍指数相结合。综合指数显示,农村地区,尤其是该州南部的农村地区,获得初级医疗保健的机会特别有限。1. 引言。一个因新冠疫情而加剧的新出现的公共卫生问题是医疗保健荒漠问题,即居民无法获得基本平价医疗保健服务的地区。随着农村医院关闭,这一问题在农村地区变得更加严重。在包括西弗吉尼亚州在内的这些地区,分散的人口获得初级医疗保健服务的机会有限。获取初级医疗保健服务时存在的地理和社会经济障碍不均衡是造成这些健康差距的主要因素。西弗吉尼亚州独特的农村和山区聚居模式、老龄化人口以及过去二十年的经济危机,导致其居民获取初级医疗保健服务的机会不平等。该州的农村性质使得难以维持许多人口都能方便到达的医疗设施,尤其是随着农村医院不断关闭,比如西弗吉尼亚州威廉姆森的一家医院(贾维,2020年)。山区地形使得在蜿蜒道路上的出行速度减慢,到最近医院的出行时间延长,而老龄化人口增加了医疗保健需求。最后,经济危机和较高的贫困率使西弗吉尼亚人支付医疗保健费用的能力降低。结果,西弗吉尼亚人正面临一场健康危机。根据西弗吉尼亚州健康统计中心最近的一份报告(2019年),西弗吉尼亚人心脏病发作率在全国排名第一,肥胖率和心理健康问题患病率在全国排名第二,糖尿病发病率排名第四,癌症发病率排名第五。西弗吉尼亚州政策制定者面临的一个问题是,用于识别和评估医疗保健荒漠的工具存在局限性,因为它们不太适合西弗吉尼亚州面临的独特挑战。学术研究尚未分析西弗吉尼亚州全面的初级医疗保健可及性,尽管此前的研究主要集中在阿巴拉契亚地区(例如,贝林格和弗里德尔,2006年;史密斯和霍洛曼,2011年;埃尔尼基等人;1995年;多诺霍等人,2015年、2016年a、2016年b),其他一些研究则关注获取更专业服务的情况(瓦尔维等人,2019年;多诺霍,2016年a)。现有的识别医疗保健匮乏地区的方法,如卫生专业人员短缺地区(HPSA),不适用于指导西弗吉尼亚州的政策,因为该州55个县中的每一个县都有几个卫生专业人员短缺地区,这使得资源优先分配变得困难。缺乏易于获取、全面且最新的医生和医疗保健设施数据库带来了更多困难。发现医生执照数据集往往包含不一致、误导性和过时的信息。卫生专业人员短缺地区指定的最后一个局限性在于,它基于邮政编码区域和人口普查区,这并不理想,因为邮政编码区域缺乏空间背景和许多协变量数据,而农村人口普查区又太大,无法捕捉可及性的空间差异。在此背景下,西弗吉尼亚州健康链接项目与西弗吉尼亚州农村卫生倡议(RHI)共同开展,以填补研究空白并支持西弗吉尼亚州初级医疗保健可及性的决策制定。该项目的目标是:(1)帮助西弗吉尼亚州的三所医学院提供农村医疗保健方面的专业培训;(2)通过在服务不足地区投资临床项目来解决健康差距问题;(3)留住西弗吉尼亚州的卫生专业人员。2018年,为支持这些目标,健康链接项目受农村卫生倡议领导层邀请,分析西弗吉尼亚州初级医疗保健可及性方面的差异,并开发农村医疗保健决策工具。这些目标还创建了一个全面且最新的医生和设施数据库、新的分析工具以及用于决策支持的新可视化工具。本文的目标是评估西弗吉尼亚州初级医疗保健的空间和社会可及性,并了解影响这种可及性的空间和社会决定因素。为实现这些目标,本文完成以下目标:(1)定义初级医疗保健和可及性;(2)建立一个广泛且最新的初级医疗保健数据库;(3)为西弗吉尼亚州开发一个评估框架;(4)为政策制定者和从业者直观呈现结果。本文结构如下。首先,我们描述在定义初级医疗保健可及性时遇到的三个方法学问题。其次,我们介绍用于解决这些问题的方法,并通过展示我们改进的增强型两步浮动集水区(以下简称E2FCA)方法及其在西弗吉尼亚州的结果来得出结论。我们在此次改进中的重点是提高分析测量距离的准确性、考虑距离衰减效应以及更精确地表示供需位置。