Lee Young H, Song Gwan G
Department of Rheumatology, 34973Korea University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Lupus. 2022 Oct;31(11):1335-1343. doi: 10.1177/09612033221118463. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).
We performed a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. We also performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness and safety of DOACs versus warfarin in patients with APS.
Five RCTs involving 648 patients with APS (330 in DOAC-treated and 318 in control groups) were included in the meta-analysis. Among the patients included in the analysis, 29 (8.8%) patients experienced recurrent thrombosis in the DOAC treatment group, and 10 patients (3.1%) had thrombosis recurrence in the warfarin treatment group, resulting in a higher incidence in DOAC-treated than in the warfarin-treated groups [odds ratio (OR) = 2.163, 95% CI = 0.985-4.748, = 0.055]. Incidence of arterial thrombosis was significantly higher in DOAC-treated patients than in warfarin-treated patients (OR = 5.168, 95% CI = 1.567-17.04, = 0.007). Stroke and thrombosis occurrences were significantly higher in the triple positivity group than in the warfarin therapy group (OR = 12.03, 95% CI = 2.249-64.36, = 0.004; OR = 2.940, 95% CI = 1.016-8.504, = 0.047). However, venous thrombosis occurrences did not differ significantly between the DOAC-treated and warfarin-treated groups. There were no significant differences between the DOAC and warfarin groups in terms of any bleeding, major bleeding, minor bleeding, and all-cause mortality.
DOACs were associated with higher rates of arterial thrombosis than warfarin in patients with APS, especially in the triple-positive group. However, a higher risk of recurrent venous thrombosis was not found in APS patients treated with DOACs compared to those treated with warfarin.
本研究旨在评估直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)与华法林相比,在抗磷脂综合征(APS)患者中的疗效和安全性。
我们使用MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验注册库进行文献检索。我们还对调查DOACs与华法林在APS患者中的有效性和安全性的随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了荟萃分析。
五项RCTs纳入了648例APS患者(DOAC治疗组330例,对照组318例)进行荟萃分析。在纳入分析的患者中,DOAC治疗组有29例(8.8%)患者发生复发性血栓形成,华法林治疗组有10例(3.1%)患者发生血栓复发,导致DOAC治疗组的发生率高于华法林治疗组[比值比(OR)=2.163,95%可信区间(CI)=0.985 - 4.748,P = 0.055]。DOAC治疗的患者动脉血栓形成的发生率显著高于华法林治疗的患者(OR = 5.168,95%CI = 1.567 - 17.04,P = 0.007)。三阳性组的中风和血栓形成发生率显著高于华法林治疗组(OR = 12.03,95%CI = 2.249 - 64.36,P = 0.004;OR = 2.940,95%CI = 1.016 - 8.504,P = 0.047)。然而,DOAC治疗组和华法林治疗组之间的静脉血栓形成发生率没有显著差异。DOAC组和华法林组在任何出血、大出血、小出血和全因死亡率方面没有显著差异。
在APS患者中,DOACs与动脉血栓形成的发生率高于华法林相关,尤其是在三阳性组。然而,与华法林治疗的APS患者相比,未发现DOAC治疗的APS患者复发性静脉血栓形成风险更高。