Suppr超能文献

直接口服抗凝剂与华法林用于抗磷脂综合征患者的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Lee Young H, Song Gwan G

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, 34973Korea University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Lupus. 2022 Oct;31(11):1335-1343. doi: 10.1177/09612033221118463. Epub 2022 Aug 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

METHODS

We performed a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. We also performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness and safety of DOACs versus warfarin in patients with APS.

RESULTS

Five RCTs involving 648 patients with APS (330 in DOAC-treated and 318 in control groups) were included in the meta-analysis. Among the patients included in the analysis, 29 (8.8%) patients experienced recurrent thrombosis in the DOAC treatment group, and 10 patients (3.1%) had thrombosis recurrence in the warfarin treatment group, resulting in a higher incidence in DOAC-treated than in the warfarin-treated groups [odds ratio (OR) = 2.163, 95% CI = 0.985-4.748, = 0.055]. Incidence of arterial thrombosis was significantly higher in DOAC-treated patients than in warfarin-treated patients (OR = 5.168, 95% CI = 1.567-17.04, = 0.007). Stroke and thrombosis occurrences were significantly higher in the triple positivity group than in the warfarin therapy group (OR = 12.03, 95% CI = 2.249-64.36, = 0.004; OR = 2.940, 95% CI = 1.016-8.504, = 0.047). However, venous thrombosis occurrences did not differ significantly between the DOAC-treated and warfarin-treated groups. There were no significant differences between the DOAC and warfarin groups in terms of any bleeding, major bleeding, minor bleeding, and all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

DOACs were associated with higher rates of arterial thrombosis than warfarin in patients with APS, especially in the triple-positive group. However, a higher risk of recurrent venous thrombosis was not found in APS patients treated with DOACs compared to those treated with warfarin.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)与华法林相比,在抗磷脂综合征(APS)患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们使用MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验注册库进行文献检索。我们还对调查DOACs与华法林在APS患者中的有效性和安全性的随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了荟萃分析。

结果

五项RCTs纳入了648例APS患者(DOAC治疗组330例,对照组318例)进行荟萃分析。在纳入分析的患者中,DOAC治疗组有29例(8.8%)患者发生复发性血栓形成,华法林治疗组有10例(3.1%)患者发生血栓复发,导致DOAC治疗组的发生率高于华法林治疗组[比值比(OR)=2.163,95%可信区间(CI)=0.985 - 4.748,P = 0.055]。DOAC治疗的患者动脉血栓形成的发生率显著高于华法林治疗的患者(OR = 5.168,95%CI = 1.567 - 17.04,P = 0.007)。三阳性组的中风和血栓形成发生率显著高于华法林治疗组(OR = 12.03,95%CI = 2.249 - 64.36,P = 0.004;OR = 2.940,95%CI = 1.016 - 8.504,P = 0.047)。然而,DOAC治疗组和华法林治疗组之间的静脉血栓形成发生率没有显著差异。DOAC组和华法林组在任何出血、大出血、小出血和全因死亡率方面没有显著差异。

结论

在APS患者中,DOACs与动脉血栓形成的发生率高于华法林相关,尤其是在三阳性组。然而,与华法林治疗的APS患者相比,未发现DOAC治疗的APS患者复发性静脉血栓形成风险更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验