• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检验医学中的质量与:携手同行。 你提供的原文似乎不太完整,“the”后面缺少内容。以上是根据现有内容翻译的结果 。

Quality in laboratory medicine and the : walking together.

作者信息

Plebani Mario

机构信息

Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Aug 16;61(5):713-720. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0755. Print 2023 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1515/cclm-2022-0755
PMID:35969689
Abstract

Quality in laboratory medicine is defined as "an unfinished journey", as the more essential the laboratory information provided, the more assured its quality should be. In the past decades, the Journal has provided a valuable forum for garnering new insights into the analytical and extra-analytical phases of the testing cycle, and for debating crucial aspects of quality in clinical laboratories. The impressive number of papers published in the is testimony to the efforts made by laboratory professionals, national and international scientific societies and federations in the quest to continuously improve upon the pre-, intra- and post-analytical steps of the testing cycle, thus enhancing the quality of laboratory information. The paper appearing in this special issue summarizes the most important and interesting contributions published in the , thus updating our knowledge on quality in laboratory medicine and offering further stimuli to identify the most valuable measures of quality in clinical laboratories.

摘要

检验医学中的质量被定义为“一段没有终点的旅程”,因为所提供的实验室信息越重要,其质量就应越有保障。在过去几十年里,该期刊为获取有关检测周期分析阶段和分析外阶段的新见解,以及为辩论临床实验室质量的关键方面,提供了一个宝贵的论坛。发表在该期刊上的大量论文证明了实验室专业人员、国家和国际科学学会及联合会为不断改进检测周期的分析前、分析中和分析后步骤所做的努力,从而提高了实验室信息的质量。本期特刊发表的论文总结了该期刊上发表的最重要和最有趣的贡献,从而更新了我们对检验医学质量的认识,并进一步激励我们去确定临床实验室中最有价值的质量衡量标准。

相似文献

1
Quality in laboratory medicine and the : walking together.检验医学中的质量与:携手同行。 你提供的原文似乎不太完整,“the”后面缺少内容。以上是根据现有内容翻译的结果 。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Aug 16;61(5):713-720. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0755. Print 2023 Apr 25.
2
Quality Indicators for the Total Testing Process.全检测流程的质量指标
Clin Lab Med. 2017 Mar;37(1):187-205. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
3
The harmonization issue in laboratory medicine: the commitment of .检验医学中的协调问题:……的承诺
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Nov 16;61(5):721-731. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1111. Print 2023 Apr 25.
4
Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: state-of-the-art, quality specifications and future strategies.检验医学中的质量指标:最新技术水平、质量规范及未来策略。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Jan 23;61(4):688-695. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1143. Print 2023 Mar 28.
5
How to meet ISO15189:2012 pre-analytical requirements in clinical laboratories? A consensus document by the EFLM WG-PRE.如何满足临床实验室 ISO15189:2012 前分析要求?EFLM WG-PRE 的共识文件。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Jan 15;59(6):1047-1061. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1859. Print 2021 May 26.
6
The CCLM contribution to improvements in quality and patient safety.CCLM 对提高质量和患者安全的贡献。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013 Jan;51(1):39-46. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0094.
7
Defining a roadmap for harmonizing quality indicators in Laboratory Medicine: a consensus statement on behalf of the IFCC Working Group "Laboratory Error and Patient Safety" and EFLM Task and Finish Group "Performance specifications for the extra-analytical phases".制定检验医学质量指标协调路线图:代表国际临床化学和检验医学联合会(IFCC)“检验误差与患者安全”工作组以及欧洲临床化学和实验室医学学会(EFLM)“分析前和分析后阶段性能规范”任务与完成小组的共识声明。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Aug 28;55(10):1478-1488. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0412.
8
National surveys on 15 quality indicators for the total testing process in clinical laboratories of China from 2015 to 2017.2015 年至 2017 年中国临床实验室总检测过程的 15 项质量指标的全国性调查。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Dec 19;57(2):195-203. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-0416.
9
Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine?临床实验室的错误还是检验医学的错误?
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(6):750-9. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2006.123.
10
Method evaluation in the clinical laboratory.临床实验室中的方法评估。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Nov 4;61(5):751-758. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0878. Print 2023 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive assessment of medical laboratory performance: a 4D model of quality, economics, velocity, and productivity indicators.医学实验室性能的综合评估:质量、经济性、速度和生产率指标的4D模型
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2025-0323.
2
Data reconciliation connected to guard bands to set specification limits related to risk assessment for radiopharmaceutical activity.与保护带相关的数据核对,以设定与放射性药物活性风险评估相关的规格限度。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 28;9(12):e22992. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22992. eCollection 2023 Dec.