• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)变体对国家病死率的影响:相关性与验证研究

The Influence of SARS-CoV-2 Variants on National Case-Fatality Rates: Correlation and Validation Study.

作者信息

Barletta William A

机构信息

Department of Physics Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA United States.

出版信息

JMIRx Med. 2022 May 24;3(2):e32935. doi: 10.2196/32935. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.

DOI:10.2196/32935
PMID:35969709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9364421/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2021, new variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus appeared with increased transmissibility and virulence as compared with the original wild variant. The first variants of concern (VoCs), Alpha (B1.1.7) and Gamma (P.1), first appeared in the United Kingdom and Brazil, respectively. The Delta (B.1.617.2) variant, seen in India in October 2020, dominated COVID-19 infections across all regions through the second half of 2021.

OBJECTIVE

This research explores the degree to which SARS-CoV-2 VoCs generate waves of fluctuations in case-fatality rates (CFRs) across countries in several regions, increase the risk of mortality to persons with certain comorbidities, and decrease the risk of mortality as the percentage of fully vaccinated populations increases.

METHODS

This analysis introduces a measure of the temporal dynamics of COVID-19 infections in the form of a proxy CFR (pCFR), which can be compared among countries. It uses economic and demographic data reported by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, plus publicly available epidemiological and medical statistics reported to the relevant national and international public health authorities. From these ecological data, pandemic average and daily COVID-19 CFRs and their correlations with potential cofactors were computed for 2021, a year dominated by the spread of World Health Organization-designated VoCs. The study does not investigate disease pathology; rather, it compares the daily case rates and pCFRs to reveal underlying contributing factors that vary from country to country and region to region.

RESULTS

The in-depth global regression analysis of cofactors found that the strongest single correlation with COVID-19 fatality was 0.36 (SD 0.02) with <.001 for chronic kidney disease. No other single physiological cofactors display positive correlations exceeding 0.26 (SD 0.26), with =.008 (asthma) and =.01 (coronary disease). The study confirms that the pCFR is a valuable metric for tracking waves of infection due to different VoCs within countries.

CONCLUSIONS

The influence of social, economic, and medical cofactors on the CFR due to VoCs remains qualitatively similar, albeit strengthened, to the levels found for the wild strain. The strong regional variations of the influence of all cofactors observed for the wild strain persists in infections for all VoCs with very strong correlation coefficients seen in the Middle East for asthma (0.76), coronary heart disease (0.60), lung disease (0.70), and chronic kidney disease (0.52). Strong regional variations emphasize the influence on COVID-19 mortality due to regional differences in national economics, patterns of health care policies, and variations in cultural practices and environment. The pCFR-based analysis reveals clear patterns of the spread of VoCs across regions, but there is little evidence for the spread of the Lambda and Mu (B.1.621) variants of interest outside of South America.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/9cccfa0e16c3/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/686ddb6f283a/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/5b2783ce01c5/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/c591f77a7928/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/aef59aec9c9d/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/79520c64e3a5/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/0ddf4409f0fd/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/a8abcb8c2e29/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/dbebbe26055e/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/9cccfa0e16c3/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/686ddb6f283a/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/5b2783ce01c5/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/c591f77a7928/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/aef59aec9c9d/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/79520c64e3a5/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/0ddf4409f0fd/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/a8abcb8c2e29/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/dbebbe26055e/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/446b/10414383/9cccfa0e16c3/xmed_v3i2e32935_fig9.jpg
摘要

背景

2021年,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒出现了新变种,与原始野生变种相比,其传播性和致病性有所增加。首批受关注变种(VoC),即阿尔法(B1.1.7)和伽马(P.1),分别首次出现在英国和巴西。2020年10月在印度发现的德尔塔(B.1.617.2)变种,在2021年下半年主导了所有地区的新冠病毒感染。

目的

本研究探讨SARS-CoV-2 VoC在几个地区的不同国家中导致病死率(CFR)波动的程度,增加某些合并症患者死亡风险的情况,以及随着完全接种疫苗人群比例增加死亡风险降低的情况。

方法

本分析引入了一种以替代CFR(pCFR)形式衡量新冠病毒感染时间动态的指标,可在不同国家之间进行比较。它使用了世界银行和国际货币基金组织报告的经济和人口数据,以及向相关国家和国际公共卫生当局报告的公开可用的流行病学和医学统计数据。根据这些生态数据,计算了2021年大流行期间的平均和每日新冠病毒CFR及其与潜在辅助因素的相关性,2021年是世界卫生组织指定的VoC传播主导的一年。该研究不调查疾病病理;相反,它比较每日病例率和pCFR,以揭示因国家和地区而异的潜在促成因素。

结果

对辅助因素的深入全球回归分析发现,与新冠病毒死亡最强的单一相关性为0.36(标准差0.02),慢性肾病的相关性<0.001。没有其他单一生理辅助因素显示正相关性超过0.26(标准差0.26),哮喘的相关性为=0.008,冠心病的相关性为=0.01。该研究证实,pCFR是追踪不同国家内不同VoC引起的感染浪潮的有价值指标。

结论

社会、经济和医学辅助因素对VoC导致的CFR的影响在性质上仍然相似,尽管有所增强,与野生毒株的影响水平相当。在野生毒株中观察到的所有辅助因素影响的强烈区域差异在所有VoC感染中仍然存在,在中东地区,哮喘(0.76)、冠心病(0.60)、肺病(0.70)和慢性肾病(0.52)的相关系数非常高。强烈的区域差异强调了由于国家经济、医疗保健政策模式以及文化习俗和环境差异对新冠病毒死亡率的影响。基于pCFR的分析揭示了VoC在各地区传播的清晰模式,但几乎没有证据表明南美以外地区有感兴趣的拉姆达和缪(B.1.621)变种传播。

相似文献

1
The Influence of SARS-CoV-2 Variants on National Case-Fatality Rates: Correlation and Validation Study.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)变体对国家病死率的影响:相关性与验证研究
JMIRx Med. 2022 May 24;3(2):e32935. doi: 10.2196/32935. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
2
Risk Factors of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Global Epidemiological Study.新型冠状病毒2019感染的风险因素:全球流行病学研究。
JMIRx Med. 2021 Aug 26;2(3):e28843. doi: 10.2196/28843. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
3
Temporal dynamics and fatality of SARS-CoV-2 variants in Bangladesh.孟加拉国新冠病毒变异株的时间动态和致死率
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 17;6(4):e1209. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1209. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Imported SARS-COV-2 Variants of Concern Drove Spread of Infections Across Kenya During the Second Year of the Pandemic.在新冠疫情的第二年,输入性严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)变异株推动了肯尼亚境内感染的传播。
medRxiv. 2022 Feb 28:2022.02.28.22271467. doi: 10.1101/2022.02.28.22271467.
5
Epidemiology of COVID-19 in Berlin-Neukölln nursing homes.柏林-诺伊科伦养老院的 COVID-19 流行病学。
J Infect Public Health. 2024 Nov;17(11):102546. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2024.102546. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Mortality Rates of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Caused by the Novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)引起的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)死亡率
Cureus. 2021 Mar 24;13(3):e14081. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14081.
8
Global Expansion of SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: Dispersal Patterns and Influence of Air Travel.关注的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)变种的全球传播:传播模式及航空旅行的影响
medRxiv. 2022 Nov 27:2022.11.22.22282629. doi: 10.1101/2022.11.22.22282629.
9
The Impact of the Highly Virulent SARS-CoV-2 Gamma Variant on Young Adults in the State of São Paulo: Was It Inevitable?高致病性严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型伽马变异株对圣保罗州年轻人的影响:这是不可避免的吗?
Cureus. 2022 Jul 1;14(7):e26486. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26486. eCollection 2022 Jul.
10
Case fatality rates of COVID-19 during epidemic periods of variants of concern: A meta-analysis by continents.关注变异株流行期间 COVID-19 的病死率:按大洲的荟萃分析。
Int J Infect Dis. 2024 Apr;141:106950. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2024.01.017. Epub 2024 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Calibrating a Comprehensive Immune Age Metric to Analyze the Cross Sectional Age-Related Decline in Cardiorespiratory Fitness.校准综合免疫年龄指标以分析心肺适能与年龄相关的横断面下降情况。
Biology (Basel). 2022 Oct 27;11(11):1576. doi: 10.3390/biology11111576.
2
Emotions and Topics Expressed on Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom: Comparative Geolocation and Text Mining Analysis.在英国 COVID-19 大流行期间在 Twitter 上表达的情绪和主题:比较地理定位和文本挖掘分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 5;24(10):e40323. doi: 10.2196/40323.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of Endotypes of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.住院COVID-19患者内型的识别
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 11;8:770343. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.770343. eCollection 2021.
2
SARS-CoV-2 Lambda and Gamma variants competition in Peru, a country with high seroprevalence.在血清阳性率较高的秘鲁,新冠病毒拉姆达变异株和伽马变异株的竞争情况
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Feb;6:100112. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100112. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
3
Long-term use of immunosuppressive medicines and in-hospital COVID-19 outcomes: a retrospective cohort study using data from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative.
免疫抑制药物的长期使用与新冠肺炎住院结局:一项使用国家新冠队列协作项目数据的回顾性队列研究
Lancet Rheumatol. 2022 Jan;4(1):e33-e41. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00325-8. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
4
Effectiveness of a third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for preventing severe outcomes in Israel: an observational study.BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 疫苗加强针在预防以色列重症结局的有效性:一项观察性研究。
Lancet. 2021 Dec 4;398(10316):2093-2100. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02249-2. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
5
The Emergence of Sars-CoV-2 Variant Lambda (C.37) in South America.南美出现新冠病毒拉姆达变种(C.37)
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0078921. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00789-21. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
6
Risk Factors of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Global Epidemiological Study.新型冠状病毒2019感染的风险因素:全球流行病学研究。
JMIRx Med. 2021 Aug 26;2(3):e28843. doi: 10.2196/28843. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
7
Hospital admission and emergency care attendance risk for SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) compared with alpha (B.1.1.7) variants of concern: a cohort study.与关注的阿尔法(B.1.1.7)变体相比,感染新冠病毒德尔塔(B.1.617.2)变体的住院和急诊就诊风险:一项队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;22(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00475-8. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
8
Effectiveness of Covid-19 Vaccines against the B.1.617.2 (Delta) Variant.Covid-19 疫苗对 B.1.617.2(德尔塔)变异株的有效性。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 12;385(7):585-594. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108891. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
9
Increased mortality in community-tested cases of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7.社区检出的 SARS-CoV-2 谱系 B.1.1.7 病例死亡率增加。
Nature. 2021 May;593(7858):270-274. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03426-1. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
10
Risk of mortality in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/1: matched cohort study.202012/1 感染关注的 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的患者的死亡率风险:匹配队列研究。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 9;372:n579. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n579.