Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Research methodology and biostatistics core, office of research Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Nov;28(11):767.e1-767.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.08.008. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only known treatment modality that can offer the possibility of cure for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Unfortunately, relapse and disease progression still occur in more than one third of cases even when patients are allografted in complete hematologic remission (CR). Treatment of AML relapsing after a first allo-HCT is particularly challenging. A second allo-HCT is offered to patients considered fit for the procedure, but reported outcomes have been conflicting. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the totality of evidence on the role of a second allo-HCT in patients with AML, we performed a comprehensive literature search using PUBMED/MEDLINE and EMBASE on August 25, 2021, and extracted clinical outcome data relating to benefits (CR, overall survival [OS], and progression-free/disease-free survival [PFS/DFS]) and harms (acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, non-relapse mortality [NRM], and relapse). The search identified 821 studies. Only 20 studies (n = 2772 patients) met our inclusion criteria. A second allo-HCT resulted in pooled CR, OS, PFS/DFS, NRM and relapse rates of 67%, 34%, 30%, 27%, and 51%, respectively. OS was 2-fold higher when the second allo-HCT was performed in CR (38% versus 17%) and 3-fold higher in patients who had a later relapse from the first allo-HCT (34% versus 10%). There was no apparent difference in pooled OS (hazard ratio = 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.31; P = .94) whether the same original donor or a different one was used. Notwithstanding several limitations apart from the high heterogeneity among included studies, this analysis shows that a second allo-HCT is a reasonable treatment option for relapsed AML. The procedure appears to be more effective when performed in CR and in patients who had a later relapse from the first allo-HCT. The high pooled relapse rates exceeding 50%, even when receiving the second allo-HCT in CR is worrisome and emphasizes the need to incorporate new therapies whether as post-transplantation maintenance or consolidation to mitigate relapse risk. This analysis was limited to patients receiving a second allo-HCT for the sole purpose of treating AML relapse. Accordingly, we caution against extrapolating these findings to other indications such as treatment of graft failure, poor graft function, or mixed donor chimerism.
异基因造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)仍然是唯一已知的能够治愈急性髓系白血病(AML)的治疗方法。不幸的是,即使患者在完全血液学缓解(CR)时接受 allo-HCT,仍有超过三分之一的病例会复发和疾病进展。对于首次 allo-HCT 后复发的 AML 患者的治疗尤其具有挑战性。对于适合该手术的患者,会提供第二次 allo-HCT,但报告的结果存在冲突。为了对第二次 allo-HCT 在 AML 患者中的作用进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估总体证据,我们于 2021 年 8 月 25 日使用 PUBMED/MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 进行了全面的文献检索,并提取了与获益(CR、总生存[OS]和无进展/无病生存[PFS/DFS])和危害(急性和慢性移植物抗宿主病、非复发死亡率[NRM]和复发)相关的临床结局数据。搜索共确定了 821 项研究。只有 20 项研究(n=2772 名患者)符合我们的纳入标准。第二次 allo-HCT 的 CR、OS、PFS/DFS、NRM 和复发率分别为 67%、34%、30%、27%和 51%。当第二次 allo-HCT 在 CR 时进行时,OS 是两倍(38%比 17%),当患者从第一次 allo-HCT 后较晚复发时,OS 是三倍(34%比 10%)。同一原始供体或不同供体的使用对汇总 OS 没有明显差异(危险比=1.01;95%置信区间,0.78-1.31;P=0.94)。除了纳入研究之间存在高度异质性之外,尽管存在一些局限性,但这项分析表明,第二次 allo-HCT 是治疗复发 AML 的合理治疗选择。当在 CR 时进行,或在患者从第一次 allo-HCT 后较晚复发时,该程序似乎更有效。即使在 CR 时接受第二次 allo-HCT,累积复发率仍超过 50%,这令人担忧,强调需要纳入新的治疗方法,无论是作为移植后维持还是巩固治疗,以降低复发风险。这项分析仅限于为治疗 AML 复发而接受第二次 allo-HCT 的患者。因此,我们警告不要将这些发现推断到其他适应症,例如治疗移植物失败、移植物功能不良或混合供体嵌合体。