Suppr超能文献

不同类型开窗的骨水泥增强椎弓根螺钉固定生物力学有效性的实验研究

An Experimental Study on the Biomechanical Effectiveness of Bone Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screw Fixation with Various Types of Fenestrations.

作者信息

Yoon Sang Hoon, Lee Sang Hyung, Jahng Tae-Ahn

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Research Center, Sociotech Co, Ltd., Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2022 Nov;65(6):779-789. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2021.0315. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effects of the number and shape of fenestrations on the mechanical strength of pedicle screws and the effects of bone cement augmentation (BCA) on the pull-out strength (POS) of screws used in conventional BCA.

METHODS

For the control group, a conventional screw was defined as C1, a screw with cannulated end-holes was defined as C2, a C2 screw with six pinholes was defined as C3, and the control group type was set. Among the experimental screws, T1 was designed using symmetrically placed thru-hole type fenestrations with an elliptical shape, while T2 was designed with half-moon (HM)-shaped asymmetrical fenestrations. T3 and T4 were designed with single HM-shaped fenestrations covering three pitches and five pitches, respectively. T5 and T6 were designed with 0.6-mm and 1-mm wider fenestrations than T3. BCA was performed by injecting 3 mL of commercial bone cement in the screw, and mechanical strength and POS tests were performed according to ASTM F1717 and ASTM F543 standards. Synthetic bone (model #1522-505) made of polyurethane foam was used as a model of osteoporotic bone, and radiographic examinations were performed using computed tomography and fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

In the fatigue test, at 75% ultimate load, fractures occurred 7781 and 9189 times; at 50%, they occurred 36122 and 82067 times; and at 25%, no fractures occurred. The mean ultimate load for each screw type was 219.1±52.39 N for T1, 234.74±15.9 N for T2, 220.70±59.23 N for T3, 216.45±32.4 N for T4, 181.55±54.78 N for T5, and 216.47±29.25 N for T6. In comparison with C1, T1, T2, T3, T4, and T6 showed significantly different ultimate load values (p<0.05). However, when the values for C2 and the fenestrated screws were evaluated with an unpaired t test, the ultimate load value of C2 significantly differed only from that of T2 (p=0.025). The ultimate load value of C3 differed significantly from those of T1 and T2 (C3 vs. T1 : p=0.048; C3 vs. T2 : p<0.001). Linear correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between the fenestration area and the volume of bone cement (Pearson's correlation coefficient r=0.288, p=0.036). The bone cement volume and ultimate load significantly correlated with each other in linear correlation analysis (r=0.403, p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

Fenestration yielded a superior ultimate load in comparison with standard BCA using a conventional screw. In T2 screws with asymmetrical two-way fenestrations showed the maximal increase in ultimate load. The fenestrated screws can be expected to show a stable position for the formation of the cement mass.

摘要

目的

分析开窗数量和形状对椎弓根螺钉力学强度的影响,以及骨水泥强化(BCA)对传统BCA中使用的螺钉拔出强度(POS)的影响。

方法

对照组中,将传统螺钉定义为C1,将带有空心端孔的螺钉定义为C2,将带有六个针孔的C2螺钉定义为C3,并设定对照组类型。在实验螺钉中,T1采用对称放置的椭圆形通孔型开窗设计,而T2采用半月形(HM)不对称开窗设计。T3和T4分别采用覆盖三个螺距和五个螺距的单个HM形开窗设计。T5和T6的开窗比T3宽0.6毫米和1毫米。通过在螺钉中注入3毫升商用骨水泥进行BCA,并根据ASTM F1717和ASTM F543标准进行力学强度和POS测试。由聚氨酯泡沫制成的合成骨(型号#1522 - 505)用作骨质疏松骨模型,并使用计算机断层扫描和荧光透视进行放射学检查。

结果

在疲劳试验中,在75%极限载荷下,骨折分别发生7781次和9189次;在50%时,分别发生36122次和82067次;在25%时,未发生骨折。每种螺钉类型的平均极限载荷为:T1为219.1±52.39 N,T2为234.74±15.9 N,T3为220.70±59.23 N,T4为216.45±32.4 N,T5为181.55±54.78 N,T6为216.47±29.25 N。与C1相比,T1、T2、T3、T4和T6的极限载荷值有显著差异(p<0.05)。然而,当用不成对t检验评估C2和开窗螺钉的值时,C2的极限载荷值仅与T2的有显著差异(p = 0.025)。C3的极限载荷值与T1和T2的有显著差异(C3与T1:p = 0.048;C3与T2:p<0.001)。线性相关分析显示开窗面积与骨水泥体积之间存在显著相关性(皮尔逊相关系数r = 0.288,p = 0.036)。在线性相关分析中,骨水泥体积与极限载荷之间显著相关(r = 0.403,p = 0.003)。

结论

与使用传统螺钉的标准BCA相比,开窗产生了更高的极限载荷。在具有不对称双向开窗的T2螺钉中,极限载荷增加最大。预计开窗螺钉在骨水泥团块形成时能显示出稳定的位置。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7f5/9666241/96fd70d7c3f9/jkns-2021-0315f1.jpg

相似文献

1
An Experimental Study on the Biomechanical Effectiveness of Bone Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screw Fixation with Various Types of Fenestrations.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2022 Nov;65(6):779-789. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2021.0315. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
2
Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading.
Eur Spine J. 2017 Jan;26(1):181-188. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3904-3. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
4
A novel bone cement injector augments Chinese osteoporotic lumbar pedicle screw channel: a biomechanical investigation.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Apr 12;23(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05181-4.
5
Mechanical and Geometric Analysis of Fenestration Design for Polymethylmethacrylate-Augmented Pedicle Screw Fixation.
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Aug;16(5):802-814. doi: 10.14444/8350. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
8
Pull-out strength of cemented solid versus fenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae.
Bone Joint Res. 2016 Sep;5(9):419-26. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.59.2000580.
9
Pull-out strength evaluation of cement augmented iliac screws in osteoporotic spino-pelvic fixation.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Nov;107(7):102945. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102945. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Fenestrated Pedicle Screws with Cement Augmentation in Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Spinal Fusion.
World Neurosurg. 2020 Nov;143:e351-e361. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.154. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
3
Biomechanical study of the fixation stability of broken pedicle screws and subsequent strategies.
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 28;14(6):e0219189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219189. eCollection 2019.
4
Minimizing Pedicle Screw Pullout Risks: A Detailed Biomechanical Analysis of Screw Design and Placement.
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Apr;30(3):E226-E232. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000151.
5
Pull-out strength of cemented solid versus fenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae.
Bone Joint Res. 2016 Sep;5(9):419-26. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.59.2000580.
7
Pedicle screw cement augmentation. A mechanical pullout study on different cement augmentation techniques.
Med Eng Phys. 2016 Feb;38(2):181-6. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.11.020. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
8
The Comparison of Pullout Strengths of Various Pedicle Screw Designs on Synthetic Foams and Ovine Vertebrae.
Turk Neurosurg. 2015;25(4):532-238. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.8907-13.1.
9
Pedicle length and degree of slip in lumbosacral isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Orthop Surg. 2015 May;7(2):108-11. doi: 10.1111/os.12173.
10
The biomechanics of pedicle screw augmentation with cement.
Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1432-45. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.016. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验