Philipps University Marburg, Center for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Location Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35037 Marburg, Germany.
Philipps University Marburg, Center for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Location Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35037 Marburg, Germany.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Nov;107(7):102945. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102945. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
Spino-pelvic fixation has been widely accepted for surgical treatment of sacral tumor, scoliosis surgery and pelvic fractures. Cement augmentation of screws is an option to improve implant stability in osteoporotic bone quality. Aim of the present study is to compare iliac screw fixation without cement fixation and two cement application options in a biomechanical testing.
Cement augmentation of iliac screws leads to superior pull-out strength.
Thirty female and osteoporotic human iliac bones were used. Three operation treatment groups were generated: Screw fixation (cannulated screws) without cement augmentation [Operation treatment (OT) A], screw fixation with cement augmentation before screw placement (cannulated screws) (OT B) and screw fixation with perforated screws and cement augmentation after screw placement (OTC). Pull-out tests were performed with a rate of 6mm/min. A load versus displacement curve was generated. Maximum pull-out force (N) was measured in the load-displacement curve.
Paired group 1 (OT A vs. OT B): Screw fixation without cement augmentation: 592.6N±335.07 and screw fixation with cement augmentation before screw placement: 996N±287.43 (p=0.0042). Paired group 2 (OT A vs. OT C): screw fixation without cement augmentation: 716.2N±385.86 and fenestrated screw fixation with cement augmentation after screw placement: 1324.88N±398.76 (p=0.0489). Paired group 3 (OT B vs. OT C): Screw fixation with cement augmentation before screw placement: 1077.2±486.66 and fenestrated screw fixation with cement augmentation after screw placement: 1298.2N±726.19 (p=0.3286).
Regarding iliac screw fixation for spino-pelvic ostesynthesis in osteoporotic bone, cement augmentation is significantly superior to solid iliac screw fixation respecting pull-out-strength. Nevertheless, further biomechanical studies are needed to verify these findings.
Not applicable; biomechanical cadaver study.
骨盆固定术已广泛应用于骶骨肿瘤、脊柱侧凸和骨盆骨折的手术治疗。螺钉的水泥增强是改善骨质疏松骨质量中植入物稳定性的一种选择。本研究旨在比较无水泥固定的髂骨螺钉固定和两种水泥应用选择在生物力学测试中的效果。
水泥增强髂骨螺钉可提高拔出强度。
使用 30 个女性和骨质疏松的人髂骨。生成了三种手术治疗组:无水泥增强的螺钉固定(空心螺钉)[手术治疗(OT)A]、螺钉固定前的水泥增强(空心螺钉)(OT B)和螺钉固定后穿孔螺钉和水泥增强(OTC)。以 6mm/min 的速度进行拔出试验。生成负载-位移曲线。在负载-位移曲线中测量最大拔出力(N)。
配对组 1(OT A 与 OT B):无水泥增强的螺钉固定:592.6N±335.07 和螺钉固定前的水泥增强:996N±287.43(p=0.0042)。配对组 2(OT A 与 OT C):无水泥增强的螺钉固定:716.2N±385.86 和螺钉固定后穿孔螺钉和水泥增强:1324.88N±398.76(p=0.0489)。配对组 3(OT B 与 OT C):螺钉固定前的水泥增强:1077.2±486.66 和螺钉固定后穿孔螺钉和水泥增强:1298.2N±726.19(p=0.3286)。
在骨质疏松性骨盆骨脊柱骨盆固定术中,髂骨螺钉固定时,水泥增强明显优于实心髂骨螺钉固定,在拔出强度方面。然而,需要进一步的生物力学研究来验证这些发现。
不适用;生物力学尸体研究。