• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的成本分析:跨国比较。

Cost-analysis of robot-assisted radical cystectomy in Europe: A cross-country comparison.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Urology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug;49(8):1511-1518. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.07.023. Epub 2022 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2022.07.023
PMID:35970622
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) is surging worldwide. Aim of the study was to perform a multicentric cost-analysis of RARC by comparing the gross cost of the intervention across hospitals in four different European countries.

METHODS

Patients who underwent RARC + ICUD were recruited from eleven European centers in four European countries (Belgium, France, Netherlands, and UK) between 2015 and 2020. Costs were divided into six parts: cost for hospital stay, cost for ICU stay, cost for surgical theater occupation, cost for transfusion, cost for robotic instruments, and cost for stapling instruments. These costs were individually assessed for each patient.

RESULTS

A total of 490 patients were included. Median operative time was 300(270-360) minutes and median hospital length-of-stay was 11(8-15) days. The average total cost of RARC was 14.794€ (95%CI 14.300-15.200€). A significant difference was found for the total cost, as well as the various subcosts abovementioned, between the four included countries. Different sets and types of robotic instruments were used by each center, leading to a difference in cost of robotic instrumentation. Nearly 84% of costs of RARC were due to hospital stay (42%), ICU stay (3%) and operative time (39%), while 16% of costs were due to robotic (8%) and stapling (8%) instruments.

CONCLUSION

Costs and subcosts of RARC + ICUD vary significantly across European countries and are mainly dependent of hospital length-of-stay and operative time rather than robotic instrumentation. Decreasing length-of-stay and reducing operative time could help to decrease the cost of RARC and make it more widely accessible.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)联合体内尿路改道(ICUD)在全球范围内迅速发展。本研究旨在通过比较四个不同欧洲国家 11 个欧洲中心的干预总费用,对 RARC 进行多中心成本分析。

方法

2015 年至 2020 年间,从四个欧洲国家(比利时、法国、荷兰和英国)的 11 个欧洲中心招募接受 RARC+ICUD 的患者。将成本分为六部分:住院费用、ICU 住院费用、手术室占用费用、输血费用、机器人器械费用和吻合器器械费用。分别评估每位患者的这些费用。

结果

共纳入 490 例患者。中位手术时间为 300(270-360)分钟,中位住院时间为 11(8-15)天。RARC 的平均总成本为 14794 欧元(95%CI 14300-15200 欧元)。四个纳入国家之间的总费用以及上述各项子费用存在显著差异。每个中心使用的机器人器械种类和数量不同,导致机器人器械成本存在差异。RARC 近 84%的成本来自住院费用(42%)、ICU 住院费用(3%)和手术时间(39%),而 16%的成本来自机器人(8%)和吻合器(8%)器械。

结论

RARC+ICUD 的成本和子成本在欧洲国家之间存在显著差异,主要取决于住院时间和手术时间,而不是机器人器械。缩短住院时间和减少手术时间可能有助于降低 RARC 的成本,使其更广泛地普及。

相似文献

1
Cost-analysis of robot-assisted radical cystectomy in Europe: A cross-country comparison.欧洲机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的成本分析:跨国比较。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug;49(8):1511-1518. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.07.023. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的体内与体外尿流改道术比较分析:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的数据。
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.042. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
3
Surgical proficiency in laparoscopic radical cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion and its adequacy for the execution of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术联合体外尿流改道术的手术熟练程度及其在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道术中的应用。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Apr;17(2):e13289. doi: 10.1111/ases.13289.
4
Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complications of robot assisted radical cystectomy with extracorporeal vs intracorporeal urinary diversion.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术采用体外与体内尿流改道术的围手术期结果及并发症比较。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Jul-Aug;43(6):277-283. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
5
Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术采用体内与体外尿流改道术的围手术期结果
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):9209-9215. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10295-5. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
6
Perioperative outcomes and complications of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a real-life, multi-institutional french study.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后膀胱癌患者行体腔内与体腔外尿流改道术的围手术期结局和并发症:一项真实世界、多机构的法国研究。
World J Urol. 2018 Nov;36(11):1711-1718. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2313-8. Epub 2018 May 9.
7
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术围手术期结局和并发症的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):376-401. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
8
Safe transition from extracorporeal to intracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted cystectomy: a recipe for reducing operative time, blood loss and complication rates.机器人辅助膀胱切除术后从体外到体内尿流改道的安全过渡:降低手术时间、出血量和并发症发生率的秘诀。
World J Urol. 2019 Feb;37(2):367-372. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2386-4. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
9
Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open: early Australian experience.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道术与开放手术对比:澳大利亚早期经验
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Oct;88(10):1028-1032. doi: 10.1111/ans.14361. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
10
Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion: A New Standard of Urinary Diversion.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿路改道:尿路改道的新标准。
J Endourol. 2021 Apr;35(4):473-482. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0760. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Stapled vs. manually sutured bowel anastomosis in robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术中吻合器与手工缝合肠吻合术的单中心回顾性分析
BMC Urol. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01763-1.
2
What Is Needed to Determine and Potentially Improve the Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Reconstructive Urinary Tract and Pelvic Floor Surgery?-ICI-RS 2024.确定并潜在改善机器人辅助重建性泌尿道和盆底手术的临床有效性和成本效益需要什么?-ICI-RS 2024
Neurourol Urodyn. 2025 Mar;44(3):683-690. doi: 10.1002/nau.25625. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
The Availability, Cost, Limitations, Learning Curve and Future of Robotic Systems in Urology and Prostate Cancer Surgery.
泌尿外科和前列腺癌手术中机器人系统的可用性、成本、局限性、学习曲线及未来
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 15;12(6):2268. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062268.
4
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Where we are in 2023.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术:2023 年的现状。
Investig Clin Urol. 2023 Mar;64(2):107-117. doi: 10.4111/icu.20220384.
5
Robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与标准腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 9;12:1024739. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1024739. eCollection 2022.