Institute of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Addiction. 2023 Feb;118(2):284-294. doi: 10.1111/add.16030. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
To test if opium tincture (OT) was non-inferior to methadone in retaining participants in opioid agonist treatment (OAT).
A Phase III, multi-centre, parallel-group, non-inferiority, double-blind randomized controlled trial with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Participants were provided treatment and followed for a period of 85 days.
Four OAT clinics in Iran.
Two hundred and four participants with opioid use disorder [mean age (standard deviation) = 37.4 (9.3); female 11.3%] recruited between July 2017 and January 2018.
Participants were assigned to either OT (102) or methadone (102) using a patient-centred flexible dosing strategy.
Treatment retention over 85 days was the primary outcome. Self-reported opioid use outside treatment and occurrence of adverse events (AEs) were the secondary outcomes.
Remaining in treatment at the end of the follow-up were 68.6% in the methadone arm and 59.8% in the OT arm. The relative retention rate of methadone to OT was 1.15 (0.97, 1.36) in both intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses; non-inferiority was not supported statistically, as the upper bound of the confidence interval exceeded our pre-specified non-inferiority margin (1.25). Opioid use outside treatment was reported by 30.3% of OT (n = 152) and 49.4% of methadone (n = 168) patients, a difference in proportions of -19%: 90% confidence interval (-28%, -10%). The total count of AEs in the OT arm (22 among nine individuals) was significantly higher (P = 0.04) than that in the methadone arm (three among two individuals). Nausea was the most common side effect.
While this study could not conclude the non-inferiority of opium tincture (OT) to methadone for retaining patients in opioid agonist treatment, OT retained 60% of participants to end of follow-up (85 days) and was superior to methadone in reducing self-reported opioid use outside treatment.
检验阿片酊(OT)在保留接受阿片类激动剂治疗(OAT)的参与者方面是否不劣于美沙酮。
一项三期、多中心、平行组、非劣效性、双盲随机对照试验,分配比例为 1:1。为参与者提供治疗并随访 85 天。
伊朗的四个 OAT 诊所。
204 名患有阿片类药物使用障碍的参与者[平均年龄(标准差)=37.4(9.3);女性占 11.3%],于 2017 年 7 月至 2018 年 1 月期间招募。
参与者采用以患者为中心的灵活剂量策略被分配到 OT(102 人)或美沙酮(102 人)组。
85 天内的治疗保留率是主要结局。治疗外阿片类药物使用的自我报告和不良事件(AE)的发生是次要结局。
在随访结束时,美沙酮组有 68.6%的参与者继续治疗,OT 组有 59.8%的参与者继续治疗。意向治疗和方案分析中,美沙酮相对于 OT 的相对保留率为 1.15(0.97,1.36);统计学上不支持非劣效性,因为置信区间的上限超过了我们预先指定的非劣效性边界(1.25)。OT 组有 30.3%(n=152)和 49.4%(n=168)的美沙酮组报告了治疗外的阿片类药物使用,比例差异为-19%:90%置信区间(-28%,-10%)。OT 组的 AE 总计数(9 名个体中有 22 例)明显高于美沙酮组(2 名个体中有 3 例)(P=0.04)。恶心是最常见的副作用。
虽然本研究无法得出阿片酊(OT)在保留接受阿片类激动剂治疗的患者方面不劣于美沙酮的结论,但 OT 组仍有 60%的参与者在随访结束(85 天)时继续接受治疗,且在减少治疗外自我报告的阿片类药物使用方面优于美沙酮。