Qin Tao, Li Li-Ming, Wang Xin-Wu, Yang Wen, Wang Xiao-Li, Xu Bo, Geng Chun-Mei
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
College of Environmental Science & Safety Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2022 Aug 8;43(8):3934-3943. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202111073.
To investigate the ambient pollution caused by volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in a typical industrial city in summer, the characteristics and chemical reactivity from VOCs and the causes of ozone (O) pollution were analyzed using online VOCs measurements during polluted and non-polluted periods in Zibo city in July 2020. The results showed that the average hourly concentration of total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) during the polluted period[(50.6±28.3)] μg·m was 32.5% higher than that during the non-polluted period[(38.2±24.9) μg·m]. The contribution of all VOCs categories were as follows:alkanes>aromatics>alkenes>alkynes, and the diurnal averages of TVOC and O concentrations were opposite during the polluted and non-polluted period. Ozone formation potential (OFP),·OH radical loss rate (), and secondary organic aerosol formation potential (SOA) during the polluted period were higher than those during the non-polluted period. Alkenes contributed most to OFP and , whereas aromatics contributed most to SOA. The tendency of the diurnal average of OFP and SOA was overall consistent with that of TVOC. The priority species of OFP, , and SOA were alkenes and aromatics. The VOCs/NO method was applied to identify the O-VOC-NO sensitivity during the polluted and non-polluted periods, and the results showed that the photochemical regimes were VOCs-limited and transition regions. In addition, the smog production model (SPM) was employed to identify the O formation regime, and the results showed that those during the polluted period were identified as VOCs-limited and transition regions from 08:00 to 16:00, whereas the non-polluted period was mainly considered to be VOCs-limited. To mitigate the O pollution in summertime, the synergistic control of VOCs (especially alkenes and aromatics) and NO emissions should be enforced.
为研究夏季典型工业城市挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)造成的环境污染,利用2020年7月淄博市污染期和非污染期的在线VOCs测量数据,分析了VOCs的特征、化学反应活性以及臭氧(O₃)污染成因。结果表明,污染期总挥发性有机化合物(TVOC)的平均小时浓度[(50.6±28.3)μg·m⁻³]比非污染期[(38.2±24.9)μg·m⁻³]高32.5%。各类VOCs的贡献如下:烷烃>芳烃>烯烃>炔烃,污染期和非污染期TVOC和O₃浓度的日均值呈相反趋势。污染期的臭氧生成潜势(OFP)、·OH自由基损失率()和二次有机气溶胶生成潜势(SOA)高于非污染期。烯烃对OFP和的贡献最大,而芳烃对SOA的贡献最大。OFP和SOA日均值的变化趋势总体上与TVOC一致。OFP、和SOA的优先物种为烯烃和芳烃。采用VOCs/NO方法确定污染期和非污染期O₃-VOC-NO的敏感性,结果表明光化学状态为VOCs限制型和过渡区。此外,采用烟雾生成模型(SPM)确定O₃生成状态,结果表明污染期08:00至16:00被确定为VOCs限制型和过渡区,而非污染期主要为VOCs限制型。为减轻夏季O₃污染,应加强对VOCs(尤其是烯烃和芳烃)和NO排放的协同控制。