Suppr超能文献

创伤超大容量输血期间输血容量和输血速度作为无效性标志物的作用。

Role of Transfusion Volume and Transfusion Rate as Markers of Futility During Ultramassive Blood Transfusion in Trauma.

机构信息

From the Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care (Dorken Gallastegi, Saillant, Hwabejire, Fawley, Parks, Kaafarani, Velmahos).

Department of Surgery (Secor, Maurer).

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Sep 1;235(3):468-480. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000268. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Using a large national database, we evaluated the relationship between RBC transfusion volume, RBC transfusion rate, and in-hospital mortality to explore the presence of a futility threshold in trauma patients receiving ultramassive blood transfusion.

STUDY DESIGN

The ACS-TQIP 2013 to 2018 database was analyzed. Adult patients who received ultramassive blood transfusion (≥20 units of RBC/24 hours) were included. RBC transfusion volume and rate were captured at the only 2 time points available in TQIP (4 hours and 24 hours), or time of death, whichever came first.

RESULTS

Among 5,135 patients analyzed, in-hospital mortality rate was 62.1% (n = 3,190), and 4-hour and 24-hour mortality rates were 17.53% (n = 900) and 42.41% (n = 2,178), respectively. RBC transfusion volumes at 4 hours (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.59 [95% CI 0.57 to 0.60]) and 24 hours (AUROC 0.59 [95% CI 0.57 to 0.60]) had low discriminatory ability for mortality and were inconclusive for futility. Mean RBC transfusion rates calculated within 4 hours (AUROC 0.65 [95% CI 0.63 to 0.66]) and 24 hours (AUROC 0.85 [95% CI 0.84 to 0.86]) had higher discriminatory ability than RBC transfusion volume. A futility threshold was not found for the mean RBC transfusion rate calculated within 4 hours. All patients with a final mean RBC transfusion rate of ≥7 U/h calculated within 24 hours of arrival experienced in-hospital death (n = 1,326); the observed maximum length of survival for these patients during the first 24 hours ranged from 24 hours for a rate of 7 U/h to 4.5 hours for rates ≥21 U/h.

CONCLUSION

RBC transfusion volume within 4 or 24 hours and mean RBC transfusion rate within 4 hours were not markers of futility. The observed maximum length of survival per mean RBC transfusion rate could inform resuscitation efforts in trauma patients receiving ongoing transfusion between 4 and 24 hours.

摘要

背景

利用大型国家数据库,我们评估了红细胞输注量、红细胞输注率与院内死亡率之间的关系,以探讨接受超大剂量输血的创伤患者是否存在无效阈值。

研究设计

分析了 ACS-TQIP 2013 至 2018 年数据库。纳入接受超大剂量输血(≥20 单位 RBC/24 小时)的成年患者。在 TQIP 中仅可获得红细胞输注量和输注率的两个时间点(4 小时和 24 小时)或死亡时间的数据,以先出现者为准。

结果

在分析的 5135 例患者中,院内死亡率为 62.1%(n=3190),4 小时和 24 小时死亡率分别为 17.53%(n=900)和 42.41%(n=2178)。4 小时(接受者操作特征曲线下面积 [AUROC]0.59[95%CI0.57 至 0.60])和 24 小时(AUROC0.59[95%CI0.57 至 0.60])的红细胞输注量对死亡率的区分能力较低,且对无效性的判断尚无定论。4 小时内计算的平均红细胞输注率(AUROC0.65[95%CI0.63 至 0.66])和 24 小时内计算的平均红细胞输注率(AUROC0.85[95%CI0.84 至 0.86])具有更高的区分能力。在 4 小时内计算的平均红细胞输注率未发现无效阈值。所有在入院后 24 小时内最终平均红细胞输注率≥7U/h 的患者均经历院内死亡(n=1326);这些患者在入院后前 24 小时内观察到的最长生存时间从 7U/h 时的 24 小时到 21U/h 时的 4.5 小时不等。

结论

4 小时或 24 小时内的红细胞输注量以及 4 小时内的平均红细胞输注率均不是无效的标志。根据平均红细胞输注率观察到的最长生存时间可指导创伤患者在 4 至 24 小时持续输血期间的复苏努力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验