Suppr超能文献

解剖型肩关节置换术后肩胛下肌肌腱切断术与剥离术的超声测定愈合率

Ultrasound-determined healing rates with subscapularis tenotomy versus peel after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

作者信息

Baisi Louis-Philippe, Athwal George S, Pollock J Whitcomb, Zhang Tinghua, Hodgdon Taryn, McIlquham Katie, Lapner Peter

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, ON, Canada; Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jan;32(1):96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Aug 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several techniques have been described for mobilizing the subscapularis tendon in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The purpose of this study was to compare subscapularis tendon healing rates, as determined by ultrasound, in patients following anatomic TSA with either a subscapularis tenotomy or subscapularis peel.

METHODS

This study was a secondary analysis of patients from a previous randomized controlled trial in which patients underwent anatomic TSA and were randomized to either a tenotomy or peel approach. The primary outcome was postoperative tendon healing rates determined on ultrasound at >12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative tendon thickness measured on ultrasound; elbow position (neutral alignment in the belly-press position vs. posterior); internal rotation function measured with the third and fourth questions of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire; and Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index. Radiographs were analyzed in patients with torn tendons.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were randomized to a tenotomy (n = 47) or peel (n = 53) approach. Postoperative ultrasound results were available in 88 patients. Tendon healing rates were 95% for tenotomy vs. 75% for peel (P = .011). The mean postoperative tendon thickness was 4 mm (standard deviation, 1.0 mm) and 4 mm (standard deviation, 1 mm) in the tenotomy and peel groups, respectively (P = .37). Internal rotation function was not associated with healing status (P = .77 and P = .22 for questions 3 and 4, respectively, of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire), nor was elbow position (P = .2) in the belly-press position.

DISCUSSION

We observed that subscapularis tenotomy had a higher healing rate than peel as determined by ultrasound in TSA patients. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative tendon thickness in intact tendons as measured on ultrasound when comparing subscapularis mobilization techniques, nor was there any association between healing status and internal rotation function or elbow position.

摘要

背景

在解剖型全肩关节置换术(TSA)中,已有多种用于松解肩胛下肌腱的技术被描述。本研究的目的是比较解剖型TSA术后采用肩胛下肌肌腱切断术或肩胛下肌剥离术患者的肩胛下肌腱愈合率,该愈合率通过超声测定。

方法

本研究是对先前一项随机对照试验患者的二次分析,在该试验中患者接受了解剖型TSA,并被随机分为肌腱切断术或剥离术组。主要结局是术后12个月以上通过超声测定的肌腱愈合率。次要结局包括超声测量的术后肌腱厚度;肘部位置(腹部按压位时中立对线与后伸);使用美国肩肘外科医师协会问卷的第三和第四个问题测量的内旋功能;以及西 Ontario 肩关节炎指数。对肌腱撕裂的患者进行了 X 线片分析。

结果

100例患者被随机分为肌腱切断术组(n = 47)或剥离术组(n = 53)。88例患者有术后超声结果。肌腱切断术的肌腱愈合率为95%,而剥离术为75%(P = 0.011)。肌腱切断术组和剥离术组术后肌腱平均厚度分别为4mm(标准差,1.0mm)和4mm(标准差,1mm)(P = 0.37)。内旋功能与愈合状态无关(美国肩肘外科医师协会问卷的第3和第4个问题分别为P = 0.77和P = 0.22),腹部按压位时的肘部位置也无关(P = 0.2)。

讨论

我们观察到,在TSA患者中,通过超声测定,肩胛下肌肌腱切断术的愈合率高于剥离术。比较肩胛下肌松解技术时,超声测量的完整肌腱术后肌腱厚度无统计学显著差异,愈合状态与内旋功能或肘部位置之间也无关联。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验