• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些信息特征会影响在社交媒体上分享关于新冠疫情错误信息的意图?有效性和新颖性的作用。

What message features influence the intention to share misinformation about COVID-19 on social media? The role of efficacy and novelty.

作者信息

Song Hayeon, So Jiyeon, Shim Minsun, Kim Jieun, Kim Eunji, Lee Kyungha

机构信息

Department of Human-AI Interaction, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Communication, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Comput Human Behav. 2023 Jan;138:107439. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107439. Epub 2022 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107439
PMID:35974879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9371473/
Abstract

Given the amount of misinformation being circulated on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic and its potential threat to public health, it is imperative to investigate ways to hinder its transmission. To this end, this study aimed to identify message features that may contribute to misinformation sharing on social media. Based on the theory of social sharing of emotion and the extant research on message credibility, this study examined if emotions and message credibility serve as mechanisms through which novelty and efficacy of misinformation influence sharing intention. An online experiment concerning COVID-19 misinformation was conducted by employing a 2 (novelty conditions: high vs. low) × 2 (efficacy conditions: high vs. low) between-subjects design using a national quota sample in South Korea ( = 1,012). The findings suggested that, contrary to the expectation, the overall effects of novelty on sharing intention were negative. The specific mechanisms played significant and unique roles in different directions: novelty increased sharing intention by evoking surprise, while also exerting a negative influence on sharing intention through an increase in negative emotions and a decrease in positive emotions and message credibility. Consistent with the expectation, efficacy exhibited positive total effects on sharing intention, which was explained by higher levels of (self- and response-) efficacy of protective action increasing positive emotions and message credibility but decreasing negative emotions. The implications and limitations of the study are discussed.

摘要

鉴于在新冠疫情期间社交媒体上流传的大量错误信息及其对公众健康的潜在威胁,研究如何阻碍其传播势在必行。为此,本研究旨在确定可能导致社交媒体上错误信息传播的信息特征。基于情感的社会分享理论和关于信息可信度的现有研究,本研究考察了情感和信息可信度是否作为错误信息的新颖性和有效性影响分享意图的机制。通过采用2(新颖性条件:高与低)×2(有效性条件:高与低)组间设计,利用韩国的全国配额样本(n = 1012)进行了一项关于新冠错误信息的在线实验。研究结果表明,与预期相反,新颖性对分享意图的总体影响是负面的。具体机制在不同方向上发挥了显著且独特的作用:新颖性通过引发惊讶情绪增加分享意图,同时也通过增加负面情绪、减少正面情绪和信息可信度对分享意图产生负面影响。与预期一致,有效性对分享意图呈现出正向的总体影响,这可以通过更高水平的(自我和反应)保护行动有效性增加正面情绪和信息可信度但减少负面情绪来解释。本文讨论了该研究的意义和局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c53d/9371473/024d8a8f1992/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c53d/9371473/34d3925350f3/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c53d/9371473/024d8a8f1992/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c53d/9371473/34d3925350f3/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c53d/9371473/024d8a8f1992/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
What message features influence the intention to share misinformation about COVID-19 on social media? The role of efficacy and novelty.哪些信息特征会影响在社交媒体上分享关于新冠疫情错误信息的意图?有效性和新颖性的作用。
Comput Human Behav. 2023 Jan;138:107439. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107439. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
Mitigating the influence of message features on health misinformation sharing intention in social media: Experimental evidence for accuracy-nudge intervention.减轻社交媒体中信息特征对健康错误信息分享意愿的影响:准确性提示干预的实验证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Sep;356:117136. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117136. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
3
Collective Value Promotes the Willingness to Share Provaccination Messages on Social Media in China: Randomized Controlled Trial.集体价值观促进中国社交媒体上分享疫苗接种信息的意愿:随机对照试验
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Oct 4;6(10):e35744. doi: 10.2196/35744.
4
Psychological Inoculation for Credibility Assessment, Sharing Intention, and Discernment of Misinformation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.心理接种对可信度评估、分享意愿和错误信息识别的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 29;25:e49255. doi: 10.2196/49255.
5
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.新冠疫情时代的假新闻:进化和心理生物学方面的考虑。
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
6
Self-Correction or Other-Correction: The Effects of Source Consistency and Ways of Correction on Sharing Intention of Health Misinformation Correction.自我纠正还是他人纠正:来源一致性和纠正方式对健康错误信息纠正分享意愿的影响
Health Commun. 2025 Mar;40(3):361-371. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2346674. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
7
Sharing Reliable COVID-19 Information and Countering Misinformation: In-Depth Interviews With Information Advocates.分享可靠的 COVID-19 信息和应对错误信息:与信息倡导者的深度访谈。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 Oct 20;3:e47677. doi: 10.2196/47677.
8
Intention of health experts to counter health misinformation in social media: Effects of perceived threat to online users, correction efficacy, and self-affirmation.健康专家在社交媒体上对抗健康错误信息的意图:对网络用户感知威胁、纠正效果和自我肯定的影响。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Apr;32(3):284-303. doi: 10.1177/09636625221138357. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
9
Tribalism and tribulations: The social costs of not sharing fake news.部落主义与苦难:不分享假新闻的社会代价。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Mar;152(3):611-631. doi: 10.1037/xge0001374. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
10
Credibility of misinformation source moderates the effectiveness of corrective messages on social media.错误信息来源的可信度会影响社交媒体上纠正信息的有效性。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Jul;33(5):587-603. doi: 10.1177/09636625231215979. Epub 2023 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Using ERPs to unveil the authenticity evaluation and neural response to online rumors.利用事件相关电位揭示对网络谣言的真实性评估及神经反应。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31274. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82696-x.
2
How life circumstances during public health crises affect people to share and correct misinformation: a perspective of the third-person effect.公共卫生危机期间的生活状况如何影响人们分享和纠正错误信息:第三人效应视角
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 16;15:1418504. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1418504. eCollection 2024.
3
Rise of post-pandemic resilience across the distrust ecosystem.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk sharing on Twitter: Social amplification and attenuation of risk in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.推特上的风险分担:新冠疫情早期风险的社会放大与衰减
Comput Human Behav. 2022 Jan;126:106983. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106983. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
2
Social status and novelty drove the spread of online information during the early stages of COVID-19.社会地位和新奇性推动了 COVID-19 早期在线信息的传播。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 11;11(1):20098. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99060-y.
3
Factors affecting individual online rumor sharing behavior in the COVID-19 pandemic.
后疫情时代不信任生态系统的韧性崛起。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 20;13(1):15640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42893-6.
4
Overcome the fragmentation in online propaganda literature: the role of cultural and cognitive sociology.克服网络宣传文献中的碎片化:文化与认知社会学的作用。
Front Sociol. 2023 Jul 11;8:1170447. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1170447. eCollection 2023.
5
The moderating influence of perceived government information transparency on COVID-19 pandemic information adoption on social media systems.感知到的政府信息透明度对社交媒体系统上新冠疫情信息采纳的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 19;14:1172094. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1172094. eCollection 2023.
6
One Dose Is Not Enough: The Beneficial Effect of Corrective COVID-19 Information Is Diminished If Followed by Misinformation.一剂并不够:如果在正确的新冠病毒信息之后接着出现错误信息,其有益效果会减弱。
Soc Media Soc. 2023 Apr 17;9(2):20563051231161298. doi: 10.1177/20563051231161298. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
新冠疫情期间影响个体在线谣言传播行为的因素
Comput Human Behav. 2021 Dec;125:106968. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106968. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
4
COVID-19-related misinformation on social media: a systematic review.社交媒体上与 COVID-19 相关的错误信息:系统评价。
Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Jun 1;99(6):455-463A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.276782. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
5
Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world.世界各地对新冠疫情错误信息的易感性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Oct 14;7(10):201199. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201199. eCollection 2020 Oct.
6
Where We Go From Here: Health Misinformation on Social Media.我们从何而来:社交媒体上的健康错误信息。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(S3):S273-S275. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305905.
7
Examining risk and crisis communications of government agencies and stakeholders during early-stages of COVID-19 on Twitter.在推特上审视新冠疫情早期阶段政府机构和利益相关者的风险与危机沟通情况。
Comput Human Behav. 2021 Jan;114:106568. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106568. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
8
Evaluating the Impact of Attempts to Correct Health Misinformation on Social Media: A Meta-Analysis.评估社交媒体纠正健康错误信息尝试的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Health Commun. 2021 Nov;36(13):1776-1784. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1794553. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
9
The Emergence of COVID-19 in the US: A Public Health and Political Communication Crisis.新冠疫情在美国的爆发:公共卫生与政治传播危机。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Dec 1;45(6):967-981. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8641506.
10
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.利用社会和行为科学来支持 COVID-19 大流行应对。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. Epub 2020 Apr 30.