Suppr超能文献

克服网络宣传文献中的碎片化:文化与认知社会学的作用。

Overcome the fragmentation in online propaganda literature: the role of cultural and cognitive sociology.

作者信息

Nerino Valentina

机构信息

Interdisciplinary Centre for Gender Studies (ICFG), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Department of Sociology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.

出版信息

Front Sociol. 2023 Jul 11;8:1170447. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1170447. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Evidence concerning the proliferation of propaganda on social media has renewed scientific interest in persuasive communication practices, resulting in a thriving yet quite disconnected scholarship. This fragmentation poses a significant challenge, as the absence of a structured and comprehensive organization of this extensive literature hampers the interpretation of findings, thus jeopardizing the understanding of online propaganda functioning. To address this fragmentation, I propose a systematization approach that involves utilizing Druckman's Generalizing Persuasion Framework as a unified interpretative tool to organize this scholarly work. By means of this approach, it is possible to systematically identify the various strands within the field, detect their respective shortcomings, and formulate new strategies to bridge these research strands and advance our knowledge of how online propaganda operates. I conclude by arguing that these strategies should involve the sociocultural perspectives offered by cognitive and cultural sociology, as these provide important insights and research tools to disentangle and evaluate the role played by supra-individual factors in the production, distribution, consumption, and evaluation of online propaganda.

摘要

有关社交媒体上宣传内容扩散的证据,重新激发了科学界对说服性传播实践的兴趣,催生了蓬勃发展但又相当分散的学术研究。这种碎片化构成了一项重大挑战,因为缺乏对这一广泛文献的结构化和全面组织,阻碍了对研究结果的解读,从而危及对在线宣传运作方式的理解。为解决这一碎片化问题,我提出一种系统化方法,即利用德鲁克曼的广义说服框架作为统一的解释工具来组织这项学术工作。通过这种方法,可以系统地识别该领域内的不同脉络,发现它们各自的不足,并制定新策略来弥合这些研究脉络,增进我们对在线宣传运作方式的认识。我在结论中指出,这些策略应涉及认知和文化社会学提供的社会文化视角,因为这些视角能提供重要的见解和研究工具,以厘清和评估超个体因素在在线宣传的制作、传播、消费和评估中所起的作用。

相似文献

1
Overcome the fragmentation in online propaganda literature: the role of cultural and cognitive sociology.
Front Sociol. 2023 Jul 11;8:1170447. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1170447. eCollection 2023.
2
The blurry lines between popular media and party propaganda: China's convergence culture through a linguistic lens.
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 25;19(1):e0297499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297499. eCollection 2024.
4
Marketing the "radical": symbolic communication and persuasive technologies in jihadist websites.
Transcult Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;50(2):216-34. doi: 10.1177/1363461513479329. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
5
Culture, Race, and Health: Implications for Racial Inequities and Population Health.
Milbank Q. 2019 Sep;97(3):736-761. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12411.
6
The Interaction of Extremist Propaganda and Anger as Predictors of Violent Responses.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Feb;36(3-4):NP1391-1411NP. doi: 10.1177/0886260517747599. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
7
Institutions and Cultural Diversity: Effects of Democratic and Propaganda Processes on Local Convergence and Global Diversity.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 8;11(4):e0153334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153334. eCollection 2016.
8
A FORMALIZATION OF THE SOCIOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGE.
Behav Sci. 1964 Jan;61:45-55. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830090107.
9
A few problems concerning population science.
Dly Rep Peoples Repub China. 1981 May 27;1(101):K15-24.

本文引用的文献

2
What message features influence the intention to share misinformation about COVID-19 on social media? The role of efficacy and novelty.
Comput Human Behav. 2023 Jan;138:107439. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107439. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
3
Social media affordances and information abundance: Enabling fake news sharing during the COVID-19 health crisis.
Health Informatics J. 2021 Jul-Sep;27(3):14604582211021470. doi: 10.1177/14604582211021470.
4
Determinants of individuals' belief in fake news: A scoping review determinants of belief in fake news.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 24;16(6):e0253717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253717. eCollection 2021.
5
The Psychology of Fake News.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 May;25(5):388-402. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
6
The False positive problem of automatic bot detection in social science research.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 22;15(10):e0241045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241045. eCollection 2020.
7
Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during COVID-19: An affordance and cognitive load perspective.
Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2020 Oct;159:120201. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120201. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
8
COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19458. doi: 10.2196/19458.
9
Bridging cultural sociology and cognitive psychology in three contemporary research programmes.
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Dec;1(12):866-872. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0242-y. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook.
Sci Adv. 2019 Jan 9;5(1):eaau4586. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586. eCollection 2019 Jan.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验