• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烧伤患者护理依赖评估量表的编制及心理测量学特性检验。

Development and psychometric testing of burn inpatient nursing dependency assessment scale.

机构信息

Department of Nursing Administration, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Changhai Hospital), Shanghai, China.

Department of Burns, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Changhai Hospital), Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3483-3494. doi: 10.1111/jan.15418. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1111/jan.15418
PMID:35975312
Abstract

AIMS

The aim was to develop and psychometrically test the burn inpatient nursing dependency assessment scale (BINDAS).

DESIGN

This was a scale development study.

METHODS

This study was conducted in four phases from November 2019 to November 2021. Items were generated and the initial scale was constructed in phase 1. The preliminary evaluation of items was conducted through expert reviews and a pilot study in phase 2. The scale, including item quality, reliability and validity, was validated with 420 individuals in phase 3. The translation of the scale from Chinese to English was performed in phase 4.

RESULTS

Content validity was satisfactory. Thirteen items were retained after item analysis, and three factors accounting for 73% of the total item variance were extracted through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Predictive validity with nursing time spent with patients during 24 h was also estimated, with r = .66 (p < .01). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted, and an area under the curve of the scale of 0.94 was obtained. Concurrent validity with Barthel index was estimated, with r = -.71 (p < .01). Cronbach's alpha coefficient for scale was .93, and the correlation between raters for total scores was .95.

CONCLUSION

Burn inpatient nursing dependency assessment scale is a psychometrically valid and reliable measurement instrument as well as objective other-rating scale with 12 items for scoring on a four-point scale (0, 1, 2 or 3) and 1 item for scoring on a two-point scale (0 or 2). BINDAS with 13 items was developed in this study. Nurses can give each patient a total score of 0-38. A high score indicates high nursing dependency. The 13-item scale consists of three factors: basic care need, physiological index, and psychology and adaptation.

IMPACT

This scale demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and can be used to evaluate patient dependency on nurses in burn units and optimize an individual's care plan to achieve efficient staff allocation.

摘要

目的

旨在开发并对烧伤住院患者护理依赖评估量表(BINDAS)进行心理测量学测试。

设计

这是一项量表开发研究。

方法

本研究于 2019 年 11 月至 2021 年 11 月分四个阶段进行。在第 1 阶段生成项目并构建初始量表。在第 2 阶段通过专家评审和试点研究对项目进行初步评估。在第 3 阶段,使用 420 名个体对量表进行了包括项目质量、信度和效度在内的验证。在第 4 阶段,对量表进行了从中文到英文的翻译。

结果

内容效度令人满意。项目分析后保留了 13 项,通过探索性和验证性因子分析提取了占总项目方差 73%的三个因素。通过与 24 小时内护理患者时间的预测效度也进行了估计,r=0.66(p<0.01)。还进行了受试者工作特征分析,量表的曲线下面积为 0.94。与巴氏量表的同时效度进行了评估,r=0.71(p<0.01)。量表的克朗巴赫α系数为 0.93,总分评分者之间的相关性为 0.95。

结论

烧伤住院患者护理依赖评估量表是一种具有心理测量学效度和信度的客观他评量表,有 12 项评分(0、1、2 或 3)的 4 点量表和 1 项评分(0 或 2)的 2 点量表。本研究开发了 BINDAS,共 13 项。护士可为每位患者打出 0-38 的总分。得分越高表示护理依赖性越高。13 项量表由基本护理需求、生理指标、心理和适应三个因素组成。

影响

该量表具有良好的心理计量学特性,可用于评估烧伤病房患者对护士的依赖程度,并优化患者的护理计划,实现高效的人员配置。

相似文献

1
Development and psychometric testing of burn inpatient nursing dependency assessment scale.烧伤患者护理依赖评估量表的编制及心理测量学特性检验。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3483-3494. doi: 10.1111/jan.15418. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
2
[Development of a risk assessment scale and test of its validity and reliability for venous thromboembolism in adult burn patients].[成人烧伤患者静脉血栓栓塞症风险评估量表的研制及其效度和信度检验]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2022 Aug 20;38(8):778-787. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210322-00098.
3
Development and psychometric testing of a Chinese version of the postnatal care experience scale for postpartum women.发展和心理测量学检验中文版产后妇女产后护理体验量表。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Dec 16;23(1):868. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06187-z.
4
Developing and psychometric testing of the anaesthesia nursing competence scale.麻醉护理能力量表的编制与心理测量学测试
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;26(3):866-878. doi: 10.1111/jep.13215. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
5
[Reliability and Validity Testing of the Taiwanese Inpatient Nursing Care Satisfaction Scale: A Pilot-Study].[台湾住院护理满意度量表的信效度测试:一项预试验研究]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2016 Jun;63(3):42-51. doi: 10.6224/JN.63.3.42.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the Irish Assertiveness Scale among Saudi undergraduate nursing students and interns.沙特阿拉伯本科护理学生和实习护士的爱尔兰自信量表阿拉伯语版本的心理计量学评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 12;16(8):e0255159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255159. eCollection 2021.
7
Development and validation of the family management scale for children with asthma (FMSCA).儿童哮喘家庭管理量表(FMSCA)的编制与验证
J Asthma. 2020 Apr;57(4):441-451. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1571085. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
8
Core Competence in Fundamental Nursing Practicum Scale: A validity and reliability analysis.基础护理实践核心能力量表:效度和信度分析。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Jul;62:103352. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103352. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
9
The Inpatient Experience with Nursing Care Scale (IPENCS): Development, validation and psychometric properties.住院患者护理体验量表(IPENCS):编制、验证及心理测量学特性。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Mar;30(2):570-581. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13509. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
10
Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床督导自我评估工具中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104734. Epub 2020 Dec 28.