Ugur S, Gunal B
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University, Nicosia, Mersin-10, Turkey.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2022 Aug;25(8):1324-1331. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_172_22.
Evaluation of the optical properties of restorative materials is an important parameter for identifying clinical success. The aim of this study was to compare the translucency of contemporary resin-matrix ceramics (RMCs) and to evaluate the effect of cement shade on the final color of RMCs indicated for laminate veneers and full crowns.
A hundred A2 shade RMC specimens were fabricated by using Mazic Duro (MD), CAMouflage NOW (CN), KZR-CAD HR2 (KZR), Grandio Block (GB), and Brilliant Crios (BC) at 0.7-mm and 1.5-mm thicknesses (n = 10). A2 shade composite resin was used for the foundation structure. Twenty resin-cement specimens were prepared from A2 and translucent shades at 0.1-mm thickness. Interchangeably, the foundation-cement-resin matrix ceramic assemblies were created with optical gel. The color coordinates were recorded using a spectrophotometer. After calculating translucency parameter (TP) and color difference (ΔE) values, data were analyzed statistically (P = 0.05).
TP values were influenced by RMC type and thickness. TP values of RMCs can be listed in descending order as MD>GB = CN>BC=KZR. ΔE values were significantly influenced by all parameters and their interactions. MD exhibited higher ΔE values among tested RMCs. The effect of A2 cement was not perceived visually while TR cement demonstrated visually perceptible but clinically acceptable values for both laminate veneers and full crowns. As the material thickness decreased, the TP and ΔE values increased in all RMCs.
Clinicians should carefully prefer cement shade and RMC material by contemplating their impact on the optical properties particularly when the restoration is thin.
评估修复材料的光学性能是确定临床成功与否的重要参数。本研究的目的是比较当代树脂基陶瓷(RMC)的半透明度,并评估粘结剂色度对用于贴面和全冠修复的RMC最终颜色的影响。
使用Mazic Duro(MD)、CAMouflage NOW(CN)、KZR-CAD HR2(KZR)、Grandio Block(GB)和Brilliant Crios(BC)制作100个A2色度的RMC样本,厚度分别为0.7毫米和1.5毫米(n = 10)。使用A2色度复合树脂制作基础结构。用A2和半透明色度制作20个厚度为0.1毫米的树脂粘结剂样本。交替使用光学凝胶制作基础-粘结剂-树脂基陶瓷组件。使用分光光度计记录颜色坐标。计算半透明度参数(TP)和色差(ΔE)值后,对数据进行统计学分析(P = 0.05)。
TP值受RMC类型和厚度影响。RMC的TP值从高到低依次为MD>GB = CN>BC=KZR。ΔE值受所有参数及其相互作用的显著影响。在测试的RMC中,MD的ΔE值较高。对于贴面和全冠修复,A2粘结剂的效果肉眼不可见,而TR粘结剂的效果肉眼可见但临床可接受。随着材料厚度减小,所有RMC的TP和ΔE值均增加。
临床医生在选择粘结剂色度和RMC材料时应仔细考虑它们对光学性能的影响,尤其是在修复体较薄时。