Dede Doğu Ömür, Sahin Onur, Özdemir Oğuz Süleyman, Yilmaz Burak, Celik Ersan, Köroğlu AySegül
Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.
Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jan;117(1):138-143. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.05.016. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
Lithium disilicate restorations are commonly used, particularly in the anterior region. The color of the underlying composite resin foundation (CRF) and luting cement may negatively affect the color of lithium disilicate ceramic restorations.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of CRF and resin cement materials on the color of lithium disilicate ceramics in 2 different translucencies.
Twenty disks (11×1.5 mm, shade A2) were fabricated from medium-opacity (mo) (n=10) and high-translucency (ht) (n=10) lithium disilicate (Lds) blocks (IPS e.max Press). Five CRF disks (11×3 mm) were fabricated in 5 different shades (A1, A2, A3, B2, C2) and 30 resin cement disks (11×0.2 mm) in the shades of translucent (Tr), universal (Un=A2), and white-opaque (Wo). Ceramic specimens were placed on each CRF, and the resin cement combination and color was measured with a spectrophotometer. CIELAB color coordinates were recorded, and the color coordinates of both ceramics on the shades of the A2 CRF and resin cement were saved as the control. Color differences (ΔE) between the control and test groups were calculated. Data were analyzed with 3-way analysis ANOVA and compared with the Tukey HSD test (α=.05).
The ΔE values were influenced by the shades of the CRF, resin cement materials, and also their interactions (P<.05). The ΔE values were not affected by the ceramic type. The ΔE values of the Wo cement groups (1.73 to 2.96) were significantly higher than those of the other cement shades (0.88 to 1.29) for each ceramic type and CRF shade (P<.05).
Lithium disilicate ceramics in 2 different translucencies were similarly influenced by the color of the underlying cement and CRF. When translucent and universal cement shades were used, the core shade did not affect the final color of the ceramics. White opaque cement caused clinically unacceptable color changes in both ceramics on all shades of CRFs except the C2 CRF and when high translucency ceramic was used on the A2 CRF. These changes were clinically acceptable, but perceptible.
二硅酸锂修复体被广泛应用,尤其是在前牙区域。其下方的复合树脂基底(CRF)和粘结水门汀的颜色可能会对二硅酸锂陶瓷修复体的颜色产生负面影响。
本体外研究的目的是调查CRF和树脂水门汀材料对两种不同透明度的二硅酸锂陶瓷颜色的影响。
用中等不透明度(mo)(n = 10)和高透明度(ht)(n = 10)的二硅酸锂(Lds)块(IPS e.max Press)制作20个圆盘(11×1.5 mm,A2色)。用5种不同颜色(A1、A2、A3、B2、C2)制作5个CRF圆盘(11×3 mm),用半透明(Tr)、通用(Un = A2)和白色不透明(Wo)三种颜色制作30个树脂水门汀圆盘(11×0.2 mm)。将陶瓷试件放置在每个CRF上,用分光光度计测量树脂水门汀组合和颜色。记录CIELAB颜色坐标,并将A2色CRF和树脂水门汀颜色下两种陶瓷的颜色坐标作为对照保存。计算对照组和试验组之间的颜色差异(ΔE)。数据采用三因素方差分析进行分析,并与Tukey HSD检验进行比较(α = 0.05)。
ΔE值受CRF颜色、树脂水门汀材料及其相互作用的影响(P < 0.05)。ΔE值不受陶瓷类型的影响。对于每种陶瓷类型和CRF颜色,Wo水门汀组的ΔE值(1.73至2.96)显著高于其他水门汀颜色组(0.88至1.29)(P < 0.05)。
两种不同透明度的二硅酸锂陶瓷受底层水门汀和CRF颜色的影响相似。当使用半透明和通用水门汀颜色时,核心颜色不影响陶瓷的最终颜色。白色不透明水门汀在除C2色CRF外的所有CRF颜色上,以及在A2色CRF上使用高透明度陶瓷时,都会使两种陶瓷产生临床上不可接受的颜色变化。这些变化在临床上是可接受的,但可以察觉。