Center for Geriatric Neuroscience, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Memory Clinic, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2022 Dec;28(12):2053-2065. doi: 10.1111/cns.13937. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
The present study aimed to compare temporal variability in the spontaneous fluctuations of activity and connectivity between amnestic MCI (aMCI) and nonamnestic MCI (naMCI), which enhances the understanding of their different pathophysiologies and provides targets for individualized intervention.
Sixty-five naMCI and 48 aMCI subjects and 75 healthy controls were recruited. A sliding window analysis was used to evaluate the dynamic amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (dALFF), dynamic regional homogeneity (dReHo), and dynamic functional connectivity (dFC). The caudal/rostral hippocampus was selected as the seeds for calculating dFC.
Both aMCI and naMCI exhibited abnormal dALFF, dReHo, and hippocampal dFC compared with healthy controls. Compared with individuals with naMCI, those with aMCI exhibited (1) higher dALFF variability in the right putamen, left Rolandic operculum, and right middle cingulum, (2) lower dReHo variability in the right superior parietal lobule, and (3) lower dFC variability between the hippocampus and other regions (left superior occipital gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, inferior cerebellum, precuneus, and right superior frontal gyrus). Additionally, variability in dALFF, dReHo, and hippocampal dFC exhibited different associations with cognitive scores in aMCI and naMCI patients, respectively. Finally, dReHo variability in the right superior parietal lobule and dFC variability between the right caudal hippocampus and left inferior cerebellum exhibited partially mediated effects on the different memory scores between people with aMCI and naMCI.
The aMCI and naMCI patients exhibited shared and specific patterns of dynamic brain activity and connectivity. The dReHo of the superior parietal lobule and dFC of the hippocampus-cerebellum contributed to the memory heterogeneity of MCI subtypes. Analyzing the temporal variability in the spontaneous fluctuations of brain activity and connectivity provided a new perspective for exploring the different pathophysiological mechanisms in MCI subtypes.
本研究旨在比较遗忘型轻度认知障碍(aMCI)和非遗忘型轻度认知障碍(naMCI)患者的自发活动和连接的时间变异性,以增强对其不同病理生理学的理解,并为个体化干预提供靶点。
招募了 65 名 naMCI 患者、48 名 aMCI 患者和 75 名健康对照者。采用滑动窗口分析评估低频振幅(dALFF)、局部一致性(dReHo)和功能连接(dFC)的动态幅度。选择尾状/额状海马体作为计算 dFC 的种子。
与健康对照组相比,aMCI 和 naMCI 患者均表现出异常的 dALFF、dReHo 和海马体 dFC。与 naMCI 患者相比,aMCI 患者表现出(1)右侧壳核、左侧 Rolandic 岛盖和右侧中扣带回的 dALFF 变异性更高,(2)右侧顶叶上回的 dReHo 变异性更低,(3)海马体与其他区域(左侧顶叶上回、中额回、小脑下叶、楔前叶和右侧额上回)之间的 dFC 变异性更低。此外,dALFF、dReHo 和海马体 dFC 的变异性在 aMCI 和 naMCI 患者的认知评分中表现出不同的相关性。最后,右侧顶叶上回的 dReHo 变异性和右侧海马体尾端与左侧小脑下叶之间的 dFC 变异性对 aMCI 和 naMCI 患者之间的不同记忆评分具有部分中介效应。
aMCI 和 naMCI 患者表现出相似和特定的脑活动和连接的动态模式。顶叶上回的 dReHo 和海马体-小脑的 dFC 对 MCI 亚型的记忆异质性有贡献。分析脑活动和连接的自发波动的时间变异性为探索 MCI 亚型不同的病理生理学机制提供了新的视角。