Levin, Papantonio, Rafferty, Proctor, Buchanan, O'Brien, Barr & Mougey, P.A., Pensacola, Florida, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2022 Oct;42(10):758-767. doi: 10.1002/phar.2725. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
Although rarely observed in clinical trials, alopecia has been reported in migraine patients treated with calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors during the postmarketing period. This study sought to assess whether CGRP inhibitors are associated with disproportionate alopecia reporting relative to other drugs including those indicated for migraine treatment or prophylaxis in a real-world setting.
Retrospective disproportionality analysis.
Spontaneous adverse events reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) through the fourth quarter of 2021.
Thirteen Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms were used to define alopecia cases in FAERS. Disproportionality was measured by calculating proportional reporting ratios (PRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A PRR >2.0 with a lower 95% CI >1.0 and ≥3 cases was considered a positive signal. During the study period, CGRP inhibitors were reported as suspect products in 55,994 adverse events including 1827 (3.26%) alopecia cases. Compared with all other drugs across FAERS, alopecia signals were detected for the collective CGRP inhibitor class (PRR 4.06; 95% CI 3.88-4.25) and fremanezumab (PRR 5.42; 95% CI 4.66-6.29), erenumab (PRR 4.29; 95% CI 4.05-4.54), galcanezumab (PRR 4.11; 95% CI 3.78-4.48), and eptinezumab (PRR 2.06; 95% CI 1.25-3.40) individually. CGRP inhibitors were consistently associated with alopecia signals relative to triptans (PRR 12.46; 95% CI 10.22-15.18) and celecoxib (PRR 3.50; 95% CI 3.19-3.83), but not in comparison with anticonvulsants, onabotulinumtoxinA, or beta-blockers across analyses. Within the CGRP inhibitor class, an alopecia signal was observed for biologics relative to drugs (PRR 6.11; 95% CI 3.79-9.87).
Significant alopecia signals were identified for CGRP inhibitors relative to all other drugs and certain comparator migraine therapies based on adverse events reported to FAERS, with CGRP-targeting biologics primarily driving disproportionate reporting. Future observational data will be necessary to better characterize the potential association between real-world use of CGRP inhibitors and incident alopecia in patients with migraine.
尽管在临床试验中很少观察到,但在上市后期间,使用降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)抑制剂治疗的偏头痛患者报告了脱发。本研究旨在评估 CGRP 抑制剂是否与不成比例的脱发报告相关,相对于其他药物,包括在真实世界环境中用于偏头痛治疗或预防的药物。
回顾性不成比例分析。
通过美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)在 2021 年第四季度报告的自发不良事件。
使用 13 个监管活动医学词典(MedDRA)首选术语来定义 FAERS 中的脱发病例。通过计算比例报告比值(PRR)和 95%置信区间(CI)来衡量不成比例性。PRR>2.0,下限 95%CI>1.0且≥3 例被认为是阳性信号。在研究期间,CGRP 抑制剂在包括 1827 例(3.26%)脱发病例的 55944 例不良事件中被报告为可疑产品。与 FAERS 中的所有其他药物相比,CGRP 抑制剂类别的脱发信号被检测到(PRR 4.06;95%CI 3.88-4.25)和 fremanezumab(PRR 5.42;95%CI 4.66-6.29)、erenumab(PRR 4.29;95%CI 4.05-4.54)、galcanezumab(PRR 4.11;95%CI 3.78-4.48)和 eptinezumab(PRR 2.06;95%CI 1.25-3.40)。CGRP 抑制剂与曲普坦(PRR 12.46;95%CI 10.22-15.18)和塞来昔布(PRR 3.50;95%CI 3.19-3.83)相比,与偏头痛治疗的其他药物相比,与 triptans(PRR 12.46;95%CI 10.22-15.18)和 celecoxib(PRR 3.50;95%CI 3.19-3.83)相比,始终与脱发信号相关,但与抗惊厥药、onabotulinumtoxinA 或β-受体阻滞剂相比则不然。在 CGRP 抑制剂类别中,与药物相比,生物制剂的脱发信号显著(PRR 6.11;95%CI 3.79-9.87)。
根据 FAERS 报告的不良事件,与所有其他药物和某些比较偏头痛治疗药物相比,CGRP 抑制剂的脱发信号显著,CGRP 靶向生物制剂主要导致不成比例的报告。未来的观察性数据将有助于更好地描述 CGRP 抑制剂在偏头痛患者中的实际使用与脱发事件之间的潜在关联。