Yale University, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022 May;80(5 Suppl 1):266-269. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2022-S129.
Glioblastoma, the most common malignant primary brain tumor, remains a lethal disease with few therapeutic options. Immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi), have revolutionized cancer treatment, but their role in glioblastoma is uncertain.
To review the state of immunotherapies in glioblastoma, with an emphasis on recently published ICPi clinical trials.
In this editorial/opinion article, we critically review results of the first generation of trials of ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab in glioblastoma, as well as future directions.
Expression of PD-L1 is frequent in glioblastoma, ranging from 60-70% of patients. Phase 1 studies of nivolumab with and without ipilimumab, as well as pembrolizumab, showed no new safety concerns in brain tumors, and no neurotoxicity. However, randomized phase 3 trials of nivolumab showed no survival improvements over bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma; no role in newly diagnosed disease as a replacement for temozolomide in unmethylated MGMT promoter tumors; and no benefit as an addition to temozolomide in methylated MGMT tumors. However, studies examining post treatment tumor samples have shown signs of increased immunologic response, and occasional long lasting radiographic responses have been seen. A small study of pembrolizumab suggested a potential role as a "neoadjuvant" treatment in resectable recurrent glioblastoma, while other studies are investigating selection of patients with higher mutational burden and novel agents and combinatorial strategies.
Despite initial negative trials, immunotherapy remains of high interest in glioblastoma, and many trials are still ongoing. Improving our mechanistic understanding of the immunosuppression and T cell dysfunction induced by both tumor and the CNS microenvironment remains however crucial for the development of successful immunotherapeutic approaches in this disease.
胶质母细胞瘤是最常见的恶性原发性脑肿瘤,目前治疗选择有限,仍是一种致命疾病。免疫疗法,特别是免疫检查点抑制剂(ICPi),已经彻底改变了癌症治疗,但它们在胶质母细胞瘤中的作用尚不确定。
综述胶质母细胞瘤免疫治疗的现状,重点介绍最近发表的 ICPi 临床试验。
在这篇社论/观点文章中,我们批判性地回顾了第一代 ipilimumab、nivolumab 和 pembrolizumab 在胶质母细胞瘤中的临床试验结果,以及未来的方向。
PD-L1 在胶质母细胞瘤中表达频繁,约占 60-70%的患者。nivolumab 联合或不联合 ipilimumab 以及 pembrolizumab 的 1 期研究在脑肿瘤中未发现新的安全性问题,也无神经毒性。然而,nivolumab 的随机 3 期试验显示,在复发性胶质母细胞瘤中,与 bevacizumab 相比,nivolumab 并未改善生存;在未甲基化 MGMT 启动子肿瘤中,作为替莫唑胺的替代方案,也未发挥作用;在甲基化 MGMT 肿瘤中,联合替莫唑胺也无获益。然而,对治疗后肿瘤样本的研究表明存在免疫反应增强的迹象,偶尔也会出现长期的影像学反应。一项小样本的 pembrolizumab 研究表明其在可切除复发性胶质母细胞瘤中可能具有“新辅助”治疗作用,而其他研究正在探索选择具有更高突变负担和新型药物及联合策略的患者。
尽管最初的临床试验结果为阴性,但免疫疗法在胶质母细胞瘤中仍然受到高度关注,许多试验仍在进行中。然而,为了在这种疾病中开发成功的免疫治疗方法,仍然需要深入了解肿瘤和中枢神经系统微环境引起的免疫抑制和 T 细胞功能障碍的机制。