Suppr超能文献

帕博利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗对比帕博利珠单抗单药治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤的随机 II 期及生物标志物研究。

Randomized Phase II and Biomarker Study of Pembrolizumab plus Bevacizumab versus Pembrolizumab Alone for Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma.

机构信息

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Feb 15;27(4):1048-1057. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2500. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

VEGF is upregulated in glioblastoma and may contribute to immunosuppression. We performed a phase II study of pembrolizumab alone or with bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty bevacizumab-naïve patients with recurrent glioblastoma were randomized to pembrolizumab with bevacizumab (cohort A, = 50) or pembrolizumab monotherapy (cohort B, = 30). The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6). Assessed biomarkers included evaluation of tumor programmed death-ligand 1 expression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density, immune activation gene expression signature, and plasma cytokines. The neurologic assessment in neuro-oncology (NANO) scale was used to prospectively assess neurologic function.

RESULTS

Pembrolizumab alone or with bevacizumab was well tolerated but of limited benefit. For cohort A, PFS-6 was 26.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.3-41.5], median overall survival (OS) was 8.8 months (95% CI, 7.7-14.2), objective response rate (ORR) was 20%, and median duration of response was 48 weeks. For cohort B, PFS-6 was 6.7% (95% CI, 1.7-25.4), median OS was 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.5-12.5), and ORR was 0%. Tumor immune markers were not associated with OS, but worsened OS correlated with baseline dexamethasone use and increased posttherapy plasma VEGF (cohort A) and mutant , unmethylated , and increased baseline PlGF and sVEGFR1 levels (cohort B). The NANO scale contributed to overall outcome assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Pembrolizumab was ineffective as monotherapy and with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma. The infrequent radiographic responses to combinatorial therapy were durable. Tumor immune biomarkers did not predict outcome. Baseline dexamethasone use and tumor MGMT warrant further study as potential biomarkers in glioblastoma immunotherapy trials.

摘要

目的

血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)在胶质母细胞瘤中上调,可能导致免疫抑制。我们进行了一项单独使用派姆单抗或联合贝伐珠单抗治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤的 II 期研究。

患者和方法

80 名贝伐珠单抗初治的复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者被随机分为派姆单抗联合贝伐珠单抗组(A 队列,n=50)或派姆单抗单药组(B 队列,n=30)。主要终点为 6 个月无进展生存期(PFS-6)。评估的生物标志物包括肿瘤程序性死亡配体 1 表达、肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞密度、免疫激活基因表达谱和血浆细胞因子的评估。神经肿瘤学中的神经功能评估(NANO)量表用于前瞻性评估神经功能。

结果

派姆单抗单药或联合贝伐珠单抗治疗耐受性良好,但获益有限。对于 A 队列,PFS-6 为 26.0%(95%置信区间,16.3-41.5),中位总生存期(OS)为 8.8 个月(95%置信区间,7.7-14.2),客观缓解率(ORR)为 20%,中位缓解持续时间为 48 周。对于 B 队列,PFS-6 为 6.7%(95%置信区间,1.7-25.4),中位 OS 为 10.3 个月(95%置信区间,8.5-12.5),ORR 为 0%。肿瘤免疫标志物与 OS 无关,但基线使用地塞米松和治疗后血浆 VEGF 增加(A 队列)以及突变型、未甲基化和基线 PlGF 和 sVEGFR1 水平增加(B 队列)与 OS 恶化相关。NANO 量表有助于总体结果评估。

结论

派姆单抗单药或联合贝伐珠单抗治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤均无效。联合治疗的罕见影像学反应是持久的。肿瘤免疫标志物不能预测预后。基线地塞米松的使用和肿瘤 MGMT 值得进一步研究,作为胶质母细胞瘤免疫治疗试验的潜在生物标志物。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma: An Overview of Current Status.胶质母细胞瘤的免疫治疗:现状概述
Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 24;17:185-209. doi: 10.2147/CPAA.S497903. eCollection 2025.
7
Immunotherapy for High-Grade Gliomas.高级别胶质瘤的免疫治疗
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 31;17(11):1849. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111849.
10
An update on the clinical trial research of immunotherapy for glioblastoma.胶质母细胞瘤免疫治疗的临床试验研究进展
Front Immunol. 2025 May 2;16:1582296. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1582296. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

3
Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of hypermutation in gliomas.胶质母细胞瘤中突变的机制及治疗意义。
Nature. 2020 Apr;580(7804):517-523. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2209-9. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验