Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2023 Feb;33(2):1174-1184. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09053-2. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) quantifies the objective response at the first assessment during systemic treatment. In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), ETS gains relevance as an early available surrogate for patient survival. The aim of this study was to increase the predictive accuracy of ETS by using semi-automated volumetry instead of standard diametric measurements.
Diametric and volumetric ETS were retrospectively calculated in 253 mCRC patients who received 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) combined with either cetuximab or bevacizumab. The association of diametric and volumetric ETS with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was compared.
Continuous diametric and volumetric ETS predicted survival similarly regarding concordance indices (p > .05). In receiver operating characteristics, a volumetric threshold of 45% optimally identified short-term survivors. For patients with volumetric ETS ≥ 45% (vs < 45%), median OS was longer (32.5 vs 19.0 months, p < .001) and the risk of death reduced for the first and second year (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.25, p < .001, and HR = 0.39, p < .001). Patients with ETS ≥ 45% had a reduced risk of progressive disease only for the first 6 months (HR = 0.26, p < .001). These survival times and risks were comparable to those of diametric ETS ≥ 20% (vs < 20%).
The accuracy of ETS in predicting survival was not increased by volumetric instead of diametric measurements. Continuous diametric and volumetric ETS similarly predicted survival, regardless of whether patients received cetuximab or bevacizumab. A volumetric ETS threshold of 45% and a diametric ETS threshold of 20% equally identified short-term survivors.
• ETS based on volumetric measurements did not predict survival more accurately than ETS based on standard diametric measurements. • Continuous diametric and volumetric ETS predicted survival similarly in patients receiving FOLFIRI with cetuximab or bevacizumab. • A volumetric ETS threshold of 45% and a diametric ETS threshold of 20% equally identified short-term survivors.
早期肿瘤退缩(ETS)量化了系统治疗首次评估时的客观反应。在转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)中,ETS 作为患者生存的早期可用替代指标变得越来越重要。本研究的目的是通过使用半自动体积测量来增加 ETS 的预测准确性,而不是使用标准的直径测量。
回顾性计算了 253 名接受氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和伊立替康(FOLFIRI)联合西妥昔单抗或贝伐单抗治疗的 mCRC 患者的直径和体积 ETS。比较了直径和体积 ETS 与总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的相关性。
连续的直径和体积 ETS 在一致性指数方面对生存的预测相似(p>0.05)。在接收者操作特征中,体积 ETS 的 45%为最佳短期生存阈值。对于体积 ETS≥45%(vs <45%)的患者,中位 OS 更长(32.5 与 19.0 个月,p<0.001),且前两年死亡风险降低(风险比[HR]=0.25,p<0.001,和 HR=0.39,p<0.001)。只有在最初的 6 个月内,ETS≥45%的患者疾病进展的风险降低(HR=0.26,p<0.001)。这些生存时间和风险与直径 ETS≥20%(vs <20%)的患者相当。
用体积测量代替直径测量并不能提高 ETS 预测生存的准确性。连续的直径和体积 ETS 同样可以预测生存,无论患者是否接受西妥昔单抗或贝伐单抗治疗。体积 ETS 阈值为 45%和直径 ETS 阈值为 20%同样可以识别短期生存者。
基于体积测量的 ETS 并不比基于标准直径测量的 ETS 更能准确预测生存。
在接受 FOLFIRI 联合西妥昔单抗或贝伐单抗治疗的患者中,连续的直径和体积 ETS 对生存的预测相似。
体积 ETS 阈值为 45%和直径 ETS 阈值为 20%同样可以识别短期生存者。