Suppr超能文献

血小板储存池缺陷患者术前止血药物与血小板输注的经验。

Experience With Pre-procedural Hemostatic Medications versus Platelet Transfusion in Patients With Platelet Storage Pool Deficiency.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Pract. 2023 Dec;36(6):1412-1418. doi: 10.1177/08971900221119167. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

Abstract

BackgroundStorage pool deficiency (SPD) is a rare bleeding disorder characterized by reduction in the number of delta granules within platelets, interfering with hemostasis. Current literature lacks well-designed studies from which to draw concrete conclusions regarding pre-procedural management of bleeding complications. The purpose of this study is to describe bleeding and safety outcomes of SPD patients receiving either pre-procedural platelet transfusions or platelet-sparing regimens. An exploratory retrospective cohort study was conducted among SPD patients, comparing major bleeding events between those who received platelet transfusion and those who received desmopressin, tranexamic acid, and/or aminocaproic acid within 24 hours prior to procedure. Rates of major bleeding were not found to be higher among patients who received a platelet-sparing regimen [platelet-sparing: 2/25 (8%); platelet transfusion: 2/29 (6.9%); = .99]. Incidence of non-major bleeding was higher in the platelet transfusion group, but this was not statistically significant [platelet-sparing: 0/25 (0%); platelet transfusion: 3/29 (10.3%); = .24]. Treatment-related adverse effects were observed following 8 of 54 procedures (14.8%). Use of a platelet-sparing regimen was not associated with a significantly higher incidence of major or non-major bleeding events. Future prospective trials are recommended to compare outcomes between therapies.

摘要

背景

储存池缺陷(SPD)是一种罕见的出血性疾病,其特征是血小板内 δ 颗粒数量减少,干扰止血。目前的文献缺乏精心设计的研究,无法得出关于出血并发症术前管理的具体结论。本研究旨在描述接受术前血小板输注或血小板节约方案的 SPD 患者的出血和安全性结果。对 SPD 患者进行了一项探索性回顾性队列研究,比较了在手术前 24 小时内接受血小板输注和接受去氨加压素、氨甲环酸和/或氨基己酸的患者之间主要出血事件的发生率。接受血小板节约方案的患者的主要出血率并未发现高于接受血小板输注的患者[血小板节约组:2/25(8%);血小板输注组:2/29(6.9%);=.99]。血小板输注组的非主要出血发生率较高,但无统计学意义[血小板节约组:0/25(0%);血小板输注组:3/29(10.3%);=.24]。54 例治疗相关不良事件中有 8 例(14.8%)。血小板节约方案的使用与主要或非主要出血事件的发生率增加无关。建议进行未来的前瞻性试验,以比较不同治疗方法之间的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验