From the Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Psychiatric and Behavioral Solutions, Salt Lake City, UT.
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022;42(5):445-453. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001592. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
This is the first controlled pharmacologic study in either adults or children with uncomplicated, treatment-resistant attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study augmented stimulant therapy with the atypical antipsychotic brexpiprazole. The Food and Drug Administration preapproved primary outcome measure (Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale [CAARS]) showed no drug-placebo differences. Often studies showing no efficacy on the prestudy, defined primary outcome variable go unpublished. While this is decried, publishing studies with equivocal results remains rare. This reanalysis highlights trends in secondary measures having implications for treatment and research regarding treatment resistant ADHD.
Initially, 559 stimulant-naive and 174 prior stimulant nonresponders received methylphenidate osmotic-release oral system, dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride, lisdexamfetamine, or mixed amphetamine salts. After 5 weeks, 168 stimulant-naive patients and 68 prior stimulant nonresponders who failed treatment were randomized to brexpiprazole or placebo in a 2:1 ratio while the remaining were on the stimulant. Outcome was measured with the CAARS, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Clinical Global Impression, and the Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (WRAADDS). The WRAADDS contains 2 factors: attention and emotional dysregulation.
Stimulant-naive patients showed no improvement with adjunctive brexpiprazole. Prior stimulant nonresponders displayed no brexpiprazole effect on the CAARS, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, or Beck Depression Inventory. In contrast, the WRAADDS detected a trend in treatment benefit, primarily through emotional dysregulation symptoms. Adverse effects on brexpiprazole and placebo were equivalent.
Brexpiprazole might be effective in ADHD adults who are nonresponders to 2 or more stimulants. Future trials in treatment-resistant ADHD should use a 1:1 randomization and use a measure of ADHD symptoms that includes emotional dysregulation.
这是第一项在未经治疗的、难治性注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的成人或儿童中进行的对照药理学研究。本研究在兴奋剂治疗的基础上加用了非典型抗精神病药布瑞哌唑。食品和药物管理局预先批准的主要结局测量(Conners 成人 ADHD 评定量表[CAARS])显示药物与安慰剂之间无差异。通常,在预研究中没有显示疗效的研究,即预先定义的主要结局变量,不会被发表。尽管这受到了谴责,但发表结果不确定的研究仍然很少。这项再分析强调了次要测量指标的趋势,这些趋势对治疗难治性 ADHD 的治疗和研究具有重要意义。
最初,559 名兴奋剂初治患者和 174 名先前兴奋剂无反应者接受了哌醋甲酯渗透释放口服系统、右旋苯丙胺氢氯化物、赖氨酸苯丁胺或混合安非他命盐治疗。5 周后,168 名兴奋剂初治患者和 68 名先前兴奋剂无反应者因治疗失败被随机分为布瑞哌唑或安慰剂 2:1 组,而其余患者继续接受兴奋剂治疗。结果采用 CAARS、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表、贝克抑郁量表、临床总体印象和 Wender-Reimherr 成人注意缺陷障碍量表(WRAADDS)进行测量。WRAADDS 包含 2 个因素:注意力和情绪失调。
在接受辅助性布瑞哌唑治疗的初治患者中,没有改善。在先前接受兴奋剂治疗但无反应的患者中,CAARS、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表或贝克抑郁量表均未显示布瑞哌唑的疗效。相比之下,WRAADDS 检测到治疗受益的趋势,主要是通过情绪失调症状。布瑞哌唑和安慰剂的不良反应相当。
布瑞哌唑可能对 2 种或以上兴奋剂治疗无反应的 ADHD 成年患者有效。在治疗抵抗性 ADHD 的未来试验中,应采用 1:1 的随机分组,并使用包括情绪失调在内的 ADHD 症状测量方法。