Suppr超能文献

心肺运动试验中主观用力程度峰值评级的参考标准:来自FRIEND的数据。

Reference Standards for Peak Rating of Perceived Exertion during Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: Data from FRIEND.

作者信息

Peterman James E, Arena Ross, Myers Jonathan, Harber Matthew P, Bonikowske Amanda R, Squires Ray W, Kaminsky Leonard A

机构信息

Fisher Institute of Health and Well-Being, College of Health, Ball State University, Muncie, IN.

Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023 Jan 1;55(1):74-79. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003023. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Peak rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is measured during clinical cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) and is commonly used as a subjective indicator of maximal effort. However, no study to date has reported reference standards or the distribution of peak RPE across a large cohort of apparently healthy individuals.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine reference standards for peak RPE when using the 6-20 Borg scale for both treadmill and cycle tests.

METHODS

The analysis included 9551 tests (8821 treadmill, 730 cycle ergometer) from 13 laboratories within the Fitness Registry and Importance of Exercise National Database (FRIEND). Using data from tests conducted January 1, 1980, to January 1, 2021, percentiles of peak RPE for men and women were determined for each decade from 20 to 89 yr of age for treadmill and cycle exercise modes. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare differences in peak RPE values between sexes and across age groups.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in RPE between age groups whether the test was performed on a treadmill or cycle ergometer ( P < 0.05). However, the mean and median RPE for each sex, age group, and test mode were between 18 and 19. In addition, 83% of participants met the traditional RPE criteria of ≥18 for indicating sufficient maximal effort.

CONCLUSIONS

This report provides the first normative reference standards for peak RPE in both male and female individuals performing CPX on a treadmill or cycle ergometer. Furthermore, these reference standards highlight the general consistency of peak RPE responses during CPX.

摘要

引言

在临床心肺运动试验(CPX)期间测量主观用力程度峰值(RPE),其通常用作最大努力的主观指标。然而,迄今为止尚无研究报告在一大群明显健康个体中主观用力程度峰值的参考标准或分布情况。

目的

本研究旨在确定在跑步机和自行车测试中使用6 - 20 Borg量表时主观用力程度峰值的参考标准。

方法

分析包括来自健身注册与运动国家数据库重要性(FRIEND)中13个实验室的9551次测试(8821次跑步机测试,730次自行车测力计测试)。利用1980年1月1日至2021年1月1日期间进行的测试数据,确定了20至89岁各年龄段男性和女性在跑步机和自行车运动模式下主观用力程度峰值的百分位数。采用双向方差分析比较性别和年龄组之间主观用力程度峰值的差异。

结果

无论测试是在跑步机还是自行车测力计上进行,年龄组之间的主观用力程度均存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.05)。然而,各性别、年龄组和测试模式的主观用力程度均值和中位数均在18至19之间。此外,83%的参与者达到了表示有足够最大努力的传统主观用力程度标准≥18。

结论

本报告提供了在跑步机或自行车测力计上进行心肺运动试验的男性和女性主观用力程度峰值的首个规范性参考标准。此外,这些参考标准突出了心肺运动试验期间主观用力程度峰值反应的总体一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验