• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤突变负荷作为一线免疫检查点抑制剂与卡铂在顺铂不适用于尿路上皮癌患者中的获益预测因子。

Tumor Mutational Burden as a Predictor of First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Versus Carboplatin Benefit in Cisplatin-Unfit Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma.

机构信息

Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA.

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 Aug;6:e2200121. doi: 10.1200/PO.22.00121.

DOI:10.1200/PO.22.00121
PMID:35977348
Abstract

PURPOSE

In real-world settings, patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) are often more frail than clinical trials, underscoring an unmet need to identify patients who might be spared first-line chemotherapy. We sought to determine whether tumor mutational burden (TMB) identifies patients with comparable or superior clinical benefit of first-line single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) in real-world patients deemed cisplatin-unfit.

METHODS

Patients with mUC treated in first-line advanced setting (N = 401) received ICPI (n = 245) or carboplatin regiment without ICPI (n = 156) at physician's discretion in standard-of-care settings across approximately 280 US academic or community-based cancer clinics between March 2014 and July 2021. Deidentified data were captured into a real-world clinicogenomic database. All patients underwent testing using Foundation Medicine assays. Progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) comparing ICPI versus chemotherapy were adjusted for known treatment assignment imbalances using propensity scores.

RESULTS

TMB ≥ 10 was detected in 122 of 401 (30.4%) patients. Among patients receiving ICPI, those with TMB ≥ 10 had more favorable PFS (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.85), TTNT (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.83), and OS (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.68). Comparing ICPI versus carboplatin, adjusting for imbalances, patients with TMB ≥ 10 had more favorable PFS (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.82), TTNT (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.91), and OS (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.08) on ICPI versus chemotherapy, but not TMB < 10. Comparisons unadjusted for imbalances had similar associations.

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world settings, mUC patients with TMB ≥ 10 have more favorable outcomes on first-line single-agent ICPI than carboplatin, adding clinical validity to TMB assessed by an existing US Food and Drug Administration-approved platform.

摘要

目的

在真实世界环境中,转移性尿路上皮癌(mUC)患者通常比临床试验中的患者更为虚弱,这突显了一种未满足的需求,即需要确定哪些患者可能无需接受一线化疗。我们旨在确定肿瘤突变负担(TMB)是否能识别出在真实世界中被认为不适合顺铂治疗的患者中,一线单药免疫检查点抑制剂(ICPI)具有相当或更好的临床获益的患者。

方法

在 2014 年 3 月至 2021 年 7 月期间,大约 280 家美国学术或社区癌症诊所的标准护理环境中,根据医生的判断,401 例 mUC 患者(n = 401)在一线晚期环境中接受了 ICPI(n = 245)或卡铂联合非 ICPI(n = 156)治疗。在大约 280 家美国学术或社区癌症诊所的标准护理环境中,根据医生的判断,401 例 mUC 患者(n = 401)接受了一线晚期环境中的 ICPI(n = 245)或卡铂联合非 ICPI(n = 156)治疗。在大约 280 家美国学术或社区癌症诊所的标准护理环境中,根据医生的判断,401 例 mUC 患者(n = 401)接受了一线晚期环境中的 ICPI(n = 245)或卡铂联合非 ICPI(n = 156)治疗。从大约 280 家美国学术或社区癌症诊所的标准护理环境中,根据医生的判断,401 例 mUC 患者(n = 401)接受了一线晚期环境中的 ICPI(n = 245)或卡铂联合非 ICPI(n = 156)治疗。无标识符数据被捕获到一个真实世界的临床基因组数据库中。所有患者均接受 Foundation Medicine 检测。使用倾向评分调整已知治疗分配不平衡,比较 ICPI 与化疗的无进展生存期(PFS)、下一次治疗时间(TTNT)和总生存期(OS)。

结果

在 401 例患者中,有 122 例(30.4%)检测到 TMB≥10。在接受 ICPI 治疗的患者中,TMB≥10 的患者具有更有利的 PFS(HR,0.59;95%CI,0.41 至 0.85)、TTNT(HR,0.59;95%CI,0.43 至 0.83)和 OS(HR,0.47;95%CI,0.32 至 0.68)。与卡铂相比,在调整了不平衡因素后,TMB≥10 的患者在接受 ICPI 治疗时具有更有利的 PFS(HR,0.51;95%CI,0.32 至 0.82)、TTNT(HR,0.56;95%CI,0.35 至 0.91)和 OS(HR,0.56;95%CI,0.29 至 1.08),而 TMB<10 的患者则没有。未调整不平衡因素的比较也具有相似的相关性。

结论

在真实世界环境中,与卡铂相比,TMB≥10 的 mUC 患者在一线单药 ICPI 治疗中具有更有利的结局,这为现有美国食品和药物管理局批准的平台评估的 TMB 提供了临床有效性。

相似文献

1
Tumor Mutational Burden as a Predictor of First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Versus Carboplatin Benefit in Cisplatin-Unfit Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma.肿瘤突变负荷作为一线免疫检查点抑制剂与卡铂在顺铂不适用于尿路上皮癌患者中的获益预测因子。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 Aug;6:e2200121. doi: 10.1200/PO.22.00121.
2
Real-world Validation of TMB and Microsatellite Instability as Predictive Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Effectiveness in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer.真实世界中 TMB 和微卫星不稳定性作为免疫检查点抑制剂在晚期胃食管癌症有效性的预测生物标志物的验证。
Cancer Res Commun. 2022 Sep 21;2(9):1037-1048. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-22-0161. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Effectiveness of First-line Immune Checkpoint Blockade Versus Carboplatin-based Chemotherapy for Metastatic Urothelial Cancer.一线免疫检查点抑制剂与含卡铂化疗方案治疗转移性尿路上皮癌的疗效比较。
Eur Urol. 2019 Oct;76(4):524-532. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.032. Epub 2019 Jul 28.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors vs Chemotherapy by Tumor Mutational Burden in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.免疫检查点抑制剂与化疗治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的比较:基于肿瘤突变负担的分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e225394. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5394.
5
Durable responders in advanced NSCLC with elevated TMB and treated with 1L immune checkpoint inhibitor: a real-world outcomes analysis.在接受 1L 免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的 TMB 升高的晚期 NSCLC 中具有持久应答者:真实世界的结果分析。
J Immunother Cancer. 2023 Jan;11(1). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005801.
6
Influence of first-line chemotherapy regimen on survival outcomes of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors.一线化疗方案对接受二线免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的晚期尿路上皮癌患者生存结局的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Oct;40(10):454.e9-454.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.05.028. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
7
Nationwide Study of Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Hungary.匈牙利转移性尿路上皮癌患者真实世界治疗模式和临床结局的全国性研究。
Adv Ther. 2023 Dec;40(12):5475-5488. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02694-9. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
8
Sequencing of PD-1/L1 Inhibitors and Carboplatin Based Chemotherapy for Cisplatin Ineligible Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.PD-1/L1 抑制剂联合卡铂为基础的化疗方案用于顺铂不适用的转移性尿路上皮癌。
J Urol. 2021 Feb;205(2):414-419. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001371. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
9
First-line immune-checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy for chemotherapy-eligible patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.一线免疫检查点抑制剂联合治疗化疗适用的转移性尿路上皮癌患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jul;151:35-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.049. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
Treatment Patterns and Attrition With Lines of Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma in the US.美国晚期尿路上皮癌治疗模式及治疗线的脱落。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e249417. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9417.

引用本文的文献

1
Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 Alteration Status and Outcomes on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.转移性尿路上皮癌患者中,成纤维细胞生长因子受体3改变状态与免疫检查点抑制剂治疗结果
JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Sep;9:e2500257. doi: 10.1200/PO-25-00257. Epub 2025 Sep 16.
2
Role of tumor mutational burden in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肿瘤突变负荷在接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的尿路上皮癌患者中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2025 May 26;16:1592761. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1592761. eCollection 2025.
3
Tumor mutational burden and survival on immune checkpoint inhibition in >8000 patients across 24 cancer types.
8000多名24种癌症类型患者的肿瘤突变负荷与免疫检查点抑制治疗的生存率
J Immunother Cancer. 2025 Feb 6;13(2):e010311. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010311.
4
Tumor mutational burden: why is it still a controversial agnostic immunotherapy biomarker?肿瘤突变负荷:为何它仍是一个存在争议的非特异性免疫治疗生物标志物?
Future Oncol. 2025 Feb;21(4):493-499. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2444862. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
5
Association of Tumor Mutational Burden and PD-L1 with the Efficacy of Pembrolizumab with or without Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.肿瘤突变负荷和程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)与帕博利珠单抗联合或不联合化疗对比单纯化疗治疗晚期尿路上皮癌疗效的相关性
Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Dec 2;30(23):5353-5364. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-3518.
6
How Immunotherapy Has Redefined the Treatment Paradigm of Metastatic or Locally Advanced Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma.免疫疗法如何重新定义转移性或局部晚期肌肉浸润性尿路上皮膀胱癌的治疗范式。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 5;16(9):1780. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091780.
7
RAS/RAF Comutation and ERBB2 Copy Number Modulates HER2 Heterogeneity and Responsiveness to HER2-directed Therapy in Colorectal Cancer.RAS/RAF 突变与 ERBB2 拷贝数调节结直肠癌中 HER2 的异质性及对 HER2 靶向治疗的反应性
Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Apr 15;30(8):1669-1684. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-2581.
8
Current and Emerging Strategies to Treat Urothelial Carcinoma.治疗尿路上皮癌的当前及新出现的策略
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 8;15(19):4886. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194886.
9
Tumor Mutational Burden in Real-World Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: Genomic Alterations and Predictive Value for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Effectiveness.真实世界胰腺癌患者的肿瘤突变负荷:基因组改变与免疫检查点抑制剂疗效的预测价值。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2023 Jul;7:e2300092. doi: 10.1200/PO.23.00092.
10
Immunotherapy for Urothelial Carcinoma: Focus on Clinical Utility of Nivolumab.尿路上皮癌的免疫疗法:聚焦纳武单抗的临床应用
Onco Targets Ther. 2022 Oct 20;15:1259-1269. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S369043. eCollection 2022.