Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
J Dent. 2022 Oct;125:104254. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104254. Epub 2022 Aug 14.
Dental pain is a commonly managed presentation in medicine and dentistry, where oxycodone is often prescribed. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine and quantify the effectiveness of oxycodone for acute dental pain.
Randomised controlled trials, controlled trials and comparative studies were included involving patients >12 years, where oxycodone was trialled for dental pain.
Three databases were searched: Medline Ovid, Embase Ovid and Web of Science. Two authors independently screened title and abstracts for relevance, extracted data and performed bias assessments.
Of 148 potentially relevant studies, 13 articles met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and of the 13, nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. All studies were single-dose analgesia for surgical third molar extractions.
Oxycodone produced more effective analgesia in combination with paracetamol. In the meta-analysis, monotherapy etoricoxib and rofecoxib showed significant pain relief compared to combination oxycodone/paracetamol (SPID6 mean difference=-2.13, CI=-3.29, -0.98; TOTPAR6 mean difference=-2.98, CI=-4.90, -1.06). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were more effective than oxycodone/paracetamol combinations, however, the evidence would become weak in a future study with a similar patient setting due to substantial statistical heterogeneity (SPID6 and TOTPAR6 prediction interval -4.471, 0.207 and -7.28, 1.32 respectively).
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were superior than oxycodone/paracetamol combinations, although some patient populations may experience similar effects to the combined oxycodone/paracetamol combination.
牙科疼痛是医学和牙科中常见的治疗方法,通常会开羟考酮。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是确定和量化羟考酮治疗急性牙痛的有效性。
纳入了涉及年龄> 12 岁的患者的随机对照试验、对照试验和比较研究,其中对羟考酮治疗牙痛进行了试验。
共检索了 3 个数据库:Medline Ovid、Embase Ovid 和 Web of Science。两名作者独立筛选标题和摘要的相关性,提取数据并进行偏倚评估。
在 148 项潜在相关研究中,有 13 项研究符合系统评价的纳入标准,其中 13 项研究纳入荟萃分析。所有研究均为单次剂量镇痛,用于第三磨牙手术拔除。
羟考酮与扑热息痛联合使用时,镇痛效果更有效。在荟萃分析中,与联合使用羟考酮/扑热息痛相比,单药治疗依托考昔和罗非昔布在疼痛缓解方面显示出显著差异(SPID6 平均差异=-2.13,CI=-3.29,-0.98;TOTPAR6 平均差异=-2.98,CI=-4.90,-1.06)。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)比羟考酮/扑热息痛联合治疗更有效,但由于存在显著的统计学异质性(SPID6 和 TOTPAR6 预测区间分别为-4.471、0.207 和-7.28、1.32),在未来具有相似患者设定的研究中,证据可能会变弱。
非甾体抗炎药优于羟考酮/扑热息痛联合治疗,尽管某些患者群体可能会与羟考酮/扑热息痛联合治疗产生相似的效果。