Mallio Carlo A, Spagnolo Giuseppe, Piervincenzi Claudia, Petsas Nikolaos, Boccetti Danilo, Spani Federica, Gallo Ida Francesca, Sisto Antonella, Quintiliani Livia, Di Gennaro Gianfranco, Bruni Vincenzo, Quattrocchi Carlo C
Unit of Diagnostic Imaging, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Unit of Bariatric Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Neuroradiology. 2023 Jan;65(1):131-143. doi: 10.1007/s00234-022-03043-3. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
To compare resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) of obese patients responders or non-responders to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with a group of obese patients with no past medical history of metabolic or bariatric surgery.
MR images were acquired at 1.5 Tesla. Resting-state fMRI data were analyzed with statistical significance threshold set at p < 0.05, family-wise error (FWE) corrected.
Sixty-two subjects were enrolled: 20 controls (age range 25-64; 14 females), 24 responders (excess weight loss > 50%; age range 23-68; 17 females), and 18 non-responders to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (excess weight loss < 50%; age range 23-67; 13 females). About within-network RSFC, responders showed significantly lower RSFC with respect to both controls and non-responders in the default mode and frontoparietal networks, positively correlating with psychological scores. Non-responders showed significantly higher (p < 0.05, family-wise error (few) corrected) RSFC in regions of the lateral visual network as compared to controls. Regarding between-network RSFC, responders showed significantly higher anti-correlation between executive control and salience networks (p < 0.05, FWE corrected) with respect to both controls and non-responders. Significant positive correlation (Spearman rho = 0.48, p = 0.0012) was found between % of excess weight loss and executive control-salience network RSFC.
There are differences in brain functional connectivity in either responders or non-responders patients to SG. The present results offer new insights into the neural correlates of outcome in patients who undergo SG and expand knowledge about neural mechanisms which may be related to surgical response.
比较接受袖状胃切除术(SG)的肥胖患者中反应者与无反应者的静息态功能连接(RSFC),并与一组无代谢或减重手术病史的肥胖患者进行对比。
在1.5特斯拉磁场下采集磁共振图像。采用统计显著性阈值设定为p < 0.05并经家族性错误率(FWE)校正的方法分析静息态功能磁共振成像数据。
共纳入62名受试者:20名对照组(年龄范围25 - 64岁;14名女性),24名反应者(超重减轻> 50%;年龄范围23 - 68岁;17名女性),以及18名袖状胃切除术(SG)无反应者(超重减轻< 50%;年龄范围23 - 67岁;13名女性)。关于网络内RSFC,反应者在默认模式和额顶叶网络中相对于对照组和无反应者均显示出显著更低的RSFC,且与心理评分呈正相关。与对照组相比,无反应者在外侧视觉网络区域显示出显著更高(p < 0.05,经家族性错误率(FWE)校正)的RSFC。关于网络间RSFC,反应者相对于对照组和无反应者在执行控制网络与突显网络之间显示出显著更高的反相关性(p < 0.05,经FWE校正)。超重减轻百分比与执行控制 - 突显网络RSFC之间存在显著正相关(斯皮尔曼相关系数rho = 0.48,p = 0.0012)。
接受SG的反应者或无反应者患者的脑功能连接存在差异。本研究结果为接受SG患者的手术结果神经关联提供了新见解,并扩展了对可能与手术反应相关的神经机制的认识。