Hou Guanhua, Anicetus Umenwaniri, He Jingwei
Pan Tianshou College of Architecture, Art and Design, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
School of art and design, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 1;13:931646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.931646. eCollection 2022.
With the global society aging, it is necessary to investigate suitable font size based on reading time/speed, readability and legibility for older adults. This study used a systematic review of previous and existing relevant research on font size for older adults and research on the psychophysics of reading and analyzed the outcomes based on reading time/speed, readability, legibility and the usability evaluation methods employed. Studies were selected from databases GOOGLE SCHOLAR, WEB OF SCIENCE, PUBMED, and SCIENCE DIRECT. An inclusion criterion was used to remove duplicates and avoid inconsistencies. Results suggest that older adults preferred larger font sizes. However, there exists a critical size at which readability declines. Inconsistencies in evaluation methods and experimental procedures were observed in the selected articles. This study suggested a reusable catalog of usability evaluation methods, eye tracking for user testing and a questionnaire for inquiry as suitable usability evaluation methods, a uniform metrics to measure font size (visual angle of font) in arcminutes and parameters to consider when investigating font size for older adults to ensure consistency in future studies.
随着全球社会老龄化,有必要基于老年人的阅读时间/速度、可读性和易读性来研究合适的字体大小。本研究对先前和现有的关于老年人字体大小的相关研究以及阅读心理物理学研究进行了系统综述,并根据阅读时间/速度、可读性、易读性以及所采用的可用性评估方法对结果进行了分析。研究从谷歌学术、科学网、PubMed和科学Direct数据库中选取。采用纳入标准来去除重复项并避免不一致性。结果表明,老年人更喜欢较大的字体大小。然而,存在一个临界大小,超过这个大小可读性就会下降。在所选取的文章中观察到评估方法和实验程序存在不一致性。本研究提出了一个可重复使用的可用性评估方法目录,用于用户测试的眼动追踪和用于询问的问卷作为合适的可用性评估方法,以角分来测量字体大小的统一度量标准(字体视角)以及在为老年人研究字体大小时要考虑的参数,以确保未来研究的一致性。