Qi Yuexiao, Xia Xiaojun, Shao Lihua, Guo Liyun, Dong Yumei, Tian Jinhui, Xu Lijun, Niu Ruijun, Wei Shihong
Department of Radiation Oncology, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 1;12:616546. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.616546. eCollection 2022.
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are a standard care option in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. TKI-based combination treatment modes show encouraging outcomes. However, it remains unknown which is the optimal treatment as the first-line regimen for these patients on overall survival (OS).
Randomized controlled trials and meeting abstracts that investigated EGFR-TKIs alone or in combination as front-line care for patients with NSCLC were systematically searched in relevant databases and reviewed. Fixed and random effects network meta-analysis models were used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS), OS, overall response rate, and grade three and higher adverse events (AEs). Surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) were used to rank treatment effects.
Eighteen studies covering six treatments and involving a total of 4389 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. On OS, the top three treatment were first-generation EGFR-TKIs (1G EGFR-TKIs) plus chemotherapy (SUCRA, 88.1%), osimertinib (SUCRA, 65.8%) and second-generation EGFR-TKIs (2GEGFR-TKIs) (SUCRA, 63.3%). On PFS, the top three treatments were osimertinib (SUCRA, 96.0%), 1G EGFR-TKIs plus chemotherapy (SUCRA, 67.1%), and 1G EGFR-TKIs plus antiangiogenesis (SUCRA, 48.2%). Two types of TKI-based combination therapy have significantly higher risk of grade three and higher AEs than TKI alone.
1G EGFR-TKIs plus chemotherapy and osimertinib seem to be the two better options as first-line care in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR-mutation. Osimertinib caused the lowest incidence of AEs. However, TKIs-based combination therapy significantly increased AEs.
酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)是表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的标准治疗选择。基于TKI的联合治疗模式显示出令人鼓舞的结果。然而,对于这些患者作为一线治疗方案,哪种是总体生存(OS)的最佳治疗方法仍不清楚。
在相关数据库中系统检索并回顾了调查EGFR-TKIs单独或联合作为NSCLC患者一线治疗的随机对照试验和会议摘要。使用固定效应和随机效应网络荟萃分析模型来估计无进展生存期(PFS)、OS、总体缓解率以及三级及以上不良事件(AE)。累积排名曲线下面积(SUCRAs)用于对治疗效果进行排名。
该网络荟萃分析纳入了18项研究,涵盖6种治疗方法,共涉及4389例患者。在OS方面,排名前三的治疗方法是第一代EGFR-TKIs(1G EGFR-TKIs)联合化疗(SUCRA,88.1%)、奥希替尼(SUCRA,65.8%)和第二代EGFR-TKIs(2G EGFR-TKIs)(SUCRA,63.3%)。在PFS方面,排名前三的治疗方法是奥希替尼(SUCRA,96.0%)、1G EGFR-TKIs联合化疗(SUCRA,67.1%)以及1G EGFR-TKIs联合抗血管生成药物(SUCRA,48.2%)。两种基于TKI的联合治疗方法发生三级及以上AE的风险显著高于单独使用TKI。
1G EGFR-TKIs联合化疗和奥希替尼似乎是EGFR突变的晚期NSCLC患者一线治疗的两个较好选择。奥希替尼导致的AE发生率最低。然而,基于TKI的联合治疗显著增加了AE。